Data from: There is no such thing as a free cigarette: lining nests with discarded butts brings short-term benefits, but causes toxic damage

Adaptation to human-modified environments such as cities is poised to be a major component of natural history in the foreseeable future. Birds have been shown to adapt their vocalizations, use of nesting places and activity rhythms to the urban environments, and we have previously reported that some species, including the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), use cellulose from smoked cigarette butts as lining material and thus reduce the number of ectoparasites in their nests, probably because the nicotine repels arthropods. Nicotine is only one of hundreds of potentially harmful substances found in cigarette butts. Here, we investigated whether the presence of such chemicals is harmful for house finches adding cigarette butts to their nests. We found that hatching and fledging success and chick immune response were all positively correlated to the proportion of the nest that was made up of butts. However, the signs of genotoxicity in the blood cells also increased with the proportion of butt cellulose in the nests. Although we have not measured the effect of genotoxicity on post-fledging survival and breeding success, it seems that bringing cigarette butts to the nest has negative consequences that may counterbalance the benefits of using them as ectoparasites repellents

Data from: An experimental demonstration that house finches add cigarette butts in response to ectoparasites

Urban species encounter resources that are uncommon in nature, such as materials found in city waste. Many studies have shown that these can be harmful to wildlife. In Mexico City, house finches bring cigarette butts to their nests, which reduces the amount of ectoparasites, but also induces genotoxic damage in chicks and parents. Yet, the reason for this behaviour is unknown. One possibility is that birds extract the cellulose fibres from discarded butts simply because they resemble feathers. Alternatively, disassembled cigarette butts may be brought to the nests because they repel ectoparasites. Here we tested the latter hypothesis by assessing whether house finches Carpodacus mexicanus increase the amount of cigarette butts in their nests in response to a raise in ectoparasite load. When present, fibres from butts are concentrated in the nest lining. By taking it away, we simultaneously removed most of the butt material and collected the bulk of the tick population infesting each nest, as these parasites cluster in the lining. We removed the bedding of nests when chicks had recently hatched, and randomly assigned each nests to one of the following treatments: 1) addition of live ticks, 2) addition of dead ticks and 3) simulation of tick addition. Females in the live ticks’ treatment added more butt fibres to their nests than parents in control treatments. Additionally, the amount of butt fibres in the original lining also predicted the amount of fibres added after the manipulation. It seems that the tendency to bring to the nest cigarette butts is at least partially a response to current, and perhaps also past, parasite load

Pre- and post-experimental manipulation assessments confirm the increase in number of birds due to the addition of nest boxes

Secondary cavity nesting (SCN) birds breed in holes that they do not excavate themselves. This is possible where there are large trees whose size and age permit the digging of holes by primary excavators and only rarely happens in forest plantations, where we expected a deficit of both breeding holes and SCN species. We assessed whether the availability of tree cavities influenced the number of SCNs in two temperate forest types, and evaluated the change in number of SCNs after adding nest boxes. First, we counted all cavities within each of our 25-m radius sampling points in mature and young forest plots during 2009. We then added nest boxes at standardised locations during 2010 and 2011 and conducted fortnightly bird counts (January–October 2009–2011). In 2011 we added two extra plots of each forest type, where we also conducted bird counts. Prior to adding nest boxes, counts revealed more SCNs in mature than in young forest. Following the addition of nest boxes, the number of SCNs increased significantly in the points with nest boxes in both types of forest. Counts in 2011 confirmed the increase in number of birds due to the addition of nest boxes. Given the likely benefits associated with a richer bird community we propose that, as is routinely done in some countries, forest management programs preserve old tree stumps and add nest boxes to forest plantations in order to increase bird numbers and bird community diversity

Data from: Do male fish prefer them big and colourful? Non-random male courtship effort in a viviparous fish with negligible paternal investment

In the majority of sexual species, there are asymmetries in reproductive effort, with males typically investing more in securing matings and females investing more in producing offspring. This causes males to mate less discriminately than females. Yet males may also become choosy if the following conditions are met: (a) that females vary in their reproductive value, (b) that males can perceive this variation, and (c) that mating with one female reduces the possibility of mating with another. These conditions may be met in the livebearing Goodeidae, a clade of Mexican fish whose females are often brightly coloured and whose males display costly ornaments and courtship as the only means to obtain matings. Males of the black-finned goodeid (Girardinichthys viviparus) have relatively simple, yet costly courtship behaviour, with mating probability depending on the duration of one-to-one courtship episodes, thus by courting one female they must ignore others. We evaluated whether the decision to court a female depends on her phenotype. Three variables of female phenotype were positively linked to the duration of male visits and to the frequency of displays performed by males: belly area, hue (“orangeness”) and size. Since fecundity and offspring survival were also a positive function of female size, we conclude that male G. viviparus evaluate the potential female reproductive value and allocate their courtship effort accordingly. Since male courtship effort is also influenced by female colouration, we suggest that our findings may help explaining the recurrent evolution of sexually dimorphic female colouration in this clade

Mendez Janovitz and Macias Garcia data

This is an Excel file containing data in three spreadsheet (Male choice trial, Brood size, Offspring survival). The top row from all the spreadsheets contains the label of each column with the variable name and the units. The first spreadsheet named “Male choice trial” contains the phenotypic data from 40 females (standard body length, belly area, dorsal fin area, hue, saturation and brightness) and the response of 10 males (Visit duration and Display frequency). The second spreadsheet named “Brood size” have the phenotypic data from 27 females (standard body length, belly area, dorsal fin area, hue, saturation and brightness) and the number of offspring they gave birth. The third spreadsheet named “Offspring survival” contains the phenotypic data from 11 females (standard body length, belly area, dorsal fin area, hue, saturation and brightness) as well as the number of offspring born, the number of offspring alive at sex weeks of age and the survival measured as the proportion of offspring with six weeks of age from those who were born

Conflict and the evolution of viviparity in vertebrates

Funding: CONACyT provided a PhD scholarship (No. 46568) for YS-L.Viviparity has evolved from oviparity approximately 142 times among vertebrates. Different theories have been proposed to explain the evolution of each of its traits in the different taxa. None, however, is applicable to all the viviparous vertebrates, since the derived ecological advantages such as controlling incubating temperature or protecting eggs against predation differ amongst clades. Most theories have been developed under a co-adaptive perspective, whereas less attention has been paid to conflict. We developed a broad panorama of the gradual evolution, from oviparity to advanced forms of viviparity, that includes the different environmental and co-adaptive selective pressures that have been suggested to be at the root of the different instances of viviparity and of the diverse maternal–foetal adaptations for nutrient transfer seen amongst vertebrates. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of conflict as a crucial driver of the evolution of many of those traits, including the evolution of epigenetic control of maternal resources. We suggest that the different types of matrotrophic viviparity, and probably also some reversals to oviparity, have been the result of an antagonistic coevolution between mothers, fathers and offspring, and their genomes. We additionally suggest that the appearance of a trait that allowed or favoured the evolution of internal development and matrotrophy generates a new selective environment that promotes further adaptations or counteradaptations, leading to the observed diversity of forms of embryonic development, nourishment, and transfer of maternal nutrients, and ultimately to the diversity of extant viviparous taxa.PostprintPeer reviewe

Exposure to pesticides impairs the expression of fish ornaments reducing the availability of attractive males

Ornament magnitude often reflects a local balance between sexual selection and other sources of natural selection opposing their elaboration. Human activity may disrupt this balance if it modifies the costs of producing, maintaining or displaying the ornaments. When costs are increased, a shortage of acceptable partners may ensue, with consequences commensurate with how stringent (and effective) the process of mate choice is. Here, we show that the expression of ornaments in the viviparous amarillo fish (Girardinichthys multiradiatus) is influenced by embryonic exposure to low concentrations of an organophosphorus insecticide. Male ornamental fin size, dimorphic yellow coloration and display rates were all compromised in exposed fish, but unaffected in their paternal half-sibling controls and in their sisters (morphology and colour). Exposure resulted in smaller fish of both sexes, thus the differential effect by sex was restricted to attributes such as fin size only above the naturally selected magnitude shown by females. Father phenotype predicted offspring morphology of controls, but not of exposed males, which were discriminated against by both control and exposed females. Since stringent female mate choice can result in females refusing to mate with suboptimal mates, this sub-lethal developmental effect can reduce the effective population size of amarillo fish populations