7 research outputs found

    Defining the limitations of measurements from Doppler spectral recordings

    Get PDF
    AbstractPurpose:The purpose of this study was to determine whether Doppler measurements of peak velocity and four other quantitative measures of spectral shape are affected significantly by the site of the Doppler recording in relation to the location of the maximum stenosis.Method: Continuous-wave and pulsed Doppler recordings were made distal to a 70% (area reduction or 45% diameter reduction) asymmetric stenosis in an in vitro flow model under steady and pulsatile flow conditions. Recordings were taken at six different locations proximal and distal to the stenosis. A photochromic dye technique was used to visualize the actual flow field in the model.Results: Distal to the stenosis, the flow visualization results demonstrated a strong radial and axial variation of the velocity field and thus explained why the Doppler measurements of peak frequency and spectral broadening were strongly dependent on the recording site. The peak frequency was maximum within the throat of the stenosis and returned to the prestenotic value five tube diameters distal to the stenosis. Other measurements of spectral broadening and spectral shape varied greatly depending on the location of the recording site in the poststenotic region. Higher order spectral moments such as the coefficient of kurtosis were found to exhibit large temporal variability, which makes them inappropriate as diagnostic indicators.Conclusions: Because of the complex nature of the poststenotic flow field, these results clearly demonstrate that no single Doppler measurement can accurately quantify the severity of a stenosis. Of the Doppler measurements only peak velocity is related to the severity of stenosis. Reproducible peak velocity measurements are obtained only if the Doppler sample volume is positioned at or very near the throat of the stenosis and at an appropriate radial site that may not necessarily be at the center of the vessel. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:34-45.
    corecore