Association of Healthy Lifestyle Factors and Obesity-Related Diseases in Adults in the UK

Importance: A healthy lifestyle is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease in adults with obesity. Little is known about the associations between a healthy lifestyle and the risk of other obesity-attributable diseases in this population. Objective: To examine the association between healthy lifestyle factors and the incidence of major obesity-related diseases in adults with obesity compared with those with normal weight. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated UK Biobank participants aged 40 to 73 years and free of major obesity-attributable disease at baseline. Participants were enrolled from 2006 to 2010 and prospectively followed up for disease diagnosis. Exposures: A healthy lifestyle score was constructed using information on not smoking, exercising regularly, no or moderate alcohol consumption, and eating a healthy diet. For each lifestyle factor, participants scored 1 if they met the criterion for a healthy lifestyle and 0 otherwise. Main Outcomes and Measures: The risk of outcomes according to the healthy lifestyle score in adults with obesity compared with those with normal weight were examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. The data analysis was performed between December 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. Results: A total of 438 583 adult participants in the UK Biobank were evaluated (female, 55.1%; male, 44.9%; mean [SD] age, 56.5 [8.1] years), of whom 107 041 (24.4%) had obesity. During a mean (SD) follow-up of 12.8 (1.7) years, 150 454 participants (34.3%) developed at least 1 of the studied diseases. Compared with adults with obesity and 0 healthy lifestyle factors, individuals with obesity who met all 4 healthy lifestyle factors were at lower risk of hypertension (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90), ischemic heart disease (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80), arrhythmias (HR, 0.71; 95% 0.61-0.81), heart failure (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80), arteriosclerosis (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.56), kidney failure (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.63-0.85), gout (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.69), sleep disorders (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83), and mood disorders (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78). The lifestyle profiles associated with the lowest risks included a healthy diet and at least 1 of the 2 healthy behaviors of physical activity and never smoking. Compared with adults with normal weight, those with obesity were at higher risk of several outcomes, irrespective of the lifestyle score (adjusted HRs ranged from 1.41 [95% CI, 1.27-1.56] for arrhythmias to 7.16 [95% CI, 6.36-8.05] for diabetes for adults with obesity and 4 healthy lifestyle factors). Conclusion and Relevance: In this large cohort study, adherence to a healthy lifestyle was associated with reduced risk of a wide range of obesity-related diseases, but this association was modest in adults with obesity. The findings suggest that although a healthy lifestyle seems to be beneficial, it does not entirely offset the health risks associated with obesity

Anorexie mentale et médecine générale (réflexions concernant la place du médecin généraliste dans le parcours de soins des patientes atteintes d anorexie mentale)

PARIS7-Xavier Bichat (751182101) / SudocSudocFranceF

Is Maternal Metabolic Bariatric Surgery the Best Solution to Tackle the Childhood Obesity Pandemic?—Reply

International audienc

Response to the Comment on “Impact of Oral Immunonutrition on Postoperative Morbidity in Digestive Oncologic Surgery: A Nation-wide Cohort Study”

International audienc

Time of Bariatric Surgery and Hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2: a Nationwide Study

International audienc

Health care use by adults with obesity: A French cohort study

International audienceObjective: Studies on obesity costs have focused on global costs of people with obesity but scarcely investigated their precise use of health care. The aim of this study is to document real-life health care use across obesity classes.Methods: Data of participants with obesity and enrolled in the CONSTANCES cohort were analyzed. Health care use was defined as ≥1 visit to general practitioners, specialists, emergency departments, and inpatient hospital admissions versus none over a 3-year period prior to enrollment and was obtained from the Universal Health Insurance database. Multivariate regression models were conducted and adjusted for comorbidities and social deprivation markers with medical visits as the outcome variables and compared people with class II and III obesity versus class I obesity.Results: Out of the 10,774 participants with obesity, 613 (5.7%) had class III obesity, and 2,076 (19.3%) had class II obesity. Compared with participants with class I obesity, class III obesity participants had higher odds of visiting emergency departments (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07-1.61) and various specialist physicians (pneumologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists) but lower odds of visiting gynecologists (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.55-0.87). Participants with class II obesity had lower odds of visiting general practitioners, dentists, and psychiatrists. There was no difference with regard to hospital admissions.Conclusion: Health care use by people with obesity differs across classes

Spin occurs in bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials with a statistically nonsignificant primary outcome: A systematic review

Objectives: To systematically identify the strategy and frequency of spin in reports of bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with statistically nonsignificant primary endpoint. Study design and Setting: The use of specific reporting strategies to highlight the beneficial effect of an experimental treatment can affect the reader interpretation of trial results, particularly when the primary endpoint is not statistically significant. A literature search was performed to identify RCTs publications assessing the impact of bariatric surgery on obesity-related comorbidities published over the past 10 years (from January 2020 till December 2020) in MEDLINE and EMBASE. RCTs publications with statistically non-significant primary outcomes were included. Results: Of 46 576 reports screened for title and abstract inclusion, 29 RCT reports met the inclusion criteria for spin analysis. In total, 16 abstracts (55%) and 18 main texts (62%) were classified as having a spin. In abstract results and conclusion sections, the spin was identified in 69% of reports. In main text results, discussion, and conclusion sections, the spin was recognized in 37%, 72%, and 76% of reports respectively. The spin consisted mainly of focusing on within-group improvements and the interpretation of statistically nonsignificant results as showing treatment equivalence. Conclusion: Spin occurred in a high proportion of bariatric surgery RCTs with a statistically nonsignificant primary endpoint

Obesity and emergency care in the French CONSTANCES cohort

International audienceCONTEXT - Obese patients are raising specific questions in emergency care such as equipment issues or urgent procedures. Even though obesity prevalence and subsequent health expenditure are increasing worldwide, there is scarce literature about their specific resource utilization of Emergency Departments (ED). These few studies do not take into account both socio-economic situation and comorbidities which are well-known factors influencing healthcare use. Our objective was to assess the emergency care resource utilization of obese individuals (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30kg.m-2) compared to normal-weight individuals taking into account comorbidities and social-economic situations. METHODS - The French CONSTANCES epidemiologic cohort is a randomly selected sample of French adults. Participants data are linked to the National Health Insurance Database collecting all medical acts. The rate of ED visits of obese (and each obesity class) and normal-weight participants were compared considering confounding factors (comorbidities, various socio-economic data). The primary endpoint was to have visited the ED between 2010 and 2013. Sex-separated analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were performed and adjusted odds-ratios [OR] (95% Confidence Intervals [CI]) were calculated. RESULTS - We included 21,035 normal-weight and 5,003 obese participants. Obese participants visited the ED more often than normal-weight participants (men: 30.5% vs. 26.7%; women: 30.3% vs. 24.4%, P<0.001). Obese participants presented more comorbidities and a lower socio-economic situation than normal-weight participants. After adjustment, obese participants had a higher risk of visiting ED (men: OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04–1.33; and women: OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.22–1.52), with a higher risk for class III participants (BMI ≥ 40 kg.m-2) (men: OR = 2.18; CI 95%: 1.32–3.63; and women: OR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.38–2.49). CONCLUSION - Obese individuals have a higher level of emergency care resource utilization than normal-weight individuals and it increases with severe obesity. Further studies are needed to better understand their healthcare pathways leading to EDs

Bariatric Surgery Should Be Proposed in Certain Septuagenarian Patients with Obesity

International audienceBariatric surgery (BS) is rarely performed on patients aged 70 and over, due to the fear of adverse effects, particularly related to sarcopenia. We examined the outcome of obese patients who underwent BS after the age of 69 in the French population. Operated subjects were matched with non-operated obese patients (n = 1307 in each group after matching). We showed that BS was associated with a reduction in mortality and no increase in the risks of rehospitalization or fracture events

Forgoing health care under universal health insurance: the case of France

International audienceOBJECTIVES - We investigate the reliability of a survey question on forgone healthcare services for financial reasons, based on analysis of actual healthcare use over the 3-year period preceding response to the question. We compare the actual use of different health services by patients who report having forgone health care to those who do not. METHODS - Based on a prospective cohort study (CONSTANCES), we link survey data from enrolled participants to the Universal Health Insurance (UHI) claims database and compare use of health services of those who report having forgone health care to controls. We present multivariable logistic regression models and assess the odds of using different health services. RESULTS - Compared to controls, forgoing care participants had lower odds of consulting GPs (OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.73, 0.93), especially specialists outside hospitals (gynecologists: 0.74 (0.69, 0.78); dermatologists: 0.81 (0.78–0.85); pneumologists 0.82 (0.71–0.94); dentists 0.71 (0.68, 0.75)); higher odds of ED visits (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.19, 1.31); and no difference in hospital admissions (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.97, 1.09). Participants with lower occupational status and income had higher odds of forgoing health care. CONCLUSIONS - The perception of those who report having forgone health care for financial reasons is consistent with their lower actual use of community-based ambulatory care (CBAC). While UHI may be necessary to improve healthcare access, it does not address the social factors associated with the population forgoing health care for financial reasons