13 research outputs found

    Surfing the spectrum - what is on the horizon?

    Get PDF
    Diagnostic imaging techniques have evolved with technological advancements - but how far? The objective of this article was to explore the electromagnetic spectrum to find imaging techniques which may deliver diagnostic information of equal, or improved, standing to conventional radiographs and to explore any developments within radiography which may yield improved diagnostic data. A comprehensive literature search was performed using Medline, Web of Knowledge, Science Direct and PubMed Databases. Boolean Operators were used and key-terms included (not exclusively): terahertz, X-ray, ultraviolet, visible, infra-red, magnetic resonance, dental, diagnostic, caries and periodontal. Radiographic techniques are primarily used for diagnostic imaging in dentistry, and continued developments in X-ray imaging include: phase contrast, darkfield and spectral imaging. Other modalities have potential application, for example, terahertz, laser doppler and optical techniques, but require further development. In particular, infra-red imaging has regenerated interest with caries detection in vitro, due to improved quality and accessibility of cameras. Non-ionising imaging techniques, for example, infra-red, are becoming more commensurate with traditional radiographic techniques for caries detection. Nevertheless, X-rays continue to be the leading diagnostic image for dentists, with improved diagnostic potential for lower radiation dose becoming a reality

    Polymers for binding of the gram-positive oral pathogen <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> - Fig 3

    No full text
    <p>Binding of coumarin 343-tagged a) cationic <b>(3)<sub>25-100%</sub></b> and b) sulfobetaine <b>(4)<sub>25-100%</sub></b> polymers at different degrees of functionalization, to <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i> and <i>S</i>. <i>mutans</i> in bacterial suspensions of OD<sub>600</sub> 0.1, and 1.0 mg mL<sup>-1</sup> polymer solutions. Area of fluorescence (%) was quantified using ImageJ. Error bars represent standard deviations on independent experiments (N = 3). Fluorescence micrographs are shown for fully functionalised (c, d) cationic and (e, f) sulfobetaine polymers, <b>(3)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub> and <b>(4)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub>, respectively using the 488 nm (green) channel.</p

    インド デ ヌノ オ サワル

    Get PDF
    <p>(A) Binding of coumarin 343-tagged sulfobetaine polymer <b>(4)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub> to <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i>, <i>S</i>. <i>mutans</i>, <i>V</i>. <i>Harveyi</i> and <i>S</i>. <i>Aureus</i> in bacterial suspensions of OD<sub>600</sub> 0.1, and 1.0 mg mL<sup>-1</sup> polymer solutions (scale bars = 5 μm). Representative fluorescence micrographs are shown using the green channel (488 nm excitation). Area of fluorescence (%) was quantified using ImageJ. Error bars represent standard deviations of three equivalent areas on three different micrographs. (B) Bacterial aggregation mediated by sulfobetaine polymer <b>(4)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub>, as quantified <i>via</i> master sizer (Coulter counter) analysis of polymer—bacteria clusters.</p

    Polymers for binding of the gram-positive oral pathogen <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> - Fig 4

    No full text
    <p>(A) Binding of coumarin 343-tagged sulfobetaine polymer <b>(4)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub> to <i>E</i>. <i>coli</i>, <i>S</i>. <i>mutans</i>, <i>V</i>. <i>Harveyi</i> and <i>S</i>. <i>Aureus</i> in bacterial suspensions of OD<sub>600</sub> 0.1, and 1.0 mg mL<sup>-1</sup> polymer solutions (scale bars = 5 μm). Representative fluorescence micrographs are shown using the green channel (488 nm excitation). Area of fluorescence (%) was quantified using ImageJ. Error bars represent standard deviations of three equivalent areas on three different micrographs. (B) Bacterial aggregation mediated by sulfobetaine polymer <b>(4)</b><sub><b>100%</b></sub>, as quantified <i>via</i> master sizer (Coulter counter) analysis of polymer—bacteria clusters.</p

    Selective polymer binding in mixed bacterial cultures: schematic representation of bacteria cross-over experiment.

    No full text
    <p>a) Bacteria with an OD<sub>600</sub> = 0.1 were mixed with 1.0 mg mL<sup>-1</sup> of polymer in deionized water and incubated for 30 minutes before washing with PBS three times, re-suspending in PBS and mounting 10 μL for microscopic imaging. b) and c) Overlapped fluorescence microscopy images of mixed culture experiment. Images recorded sequentially, then overlapped. Experiments were performed in duplicate (b) and c)).</p
    corecore