Cell Cycle-dependent Metabolism of Pyrimidine Deoxynucleoside Triphosphates in CEM Cells

We incorporated 3H-labeled thymidine, deoxycytidine, or cytidine into dNTPs and DNA of exponentially growing CEM cells. G1 and S phase cells were separated by centrifugal elutriation, and the size and specific activity of dNTP pools were determined to study the cell cycle-dependent regulation of specific dNTP synthesizing enzymes in their metabolic context. With [3H]thymidine, we confirm the earlier demonstrated S phase specificity of thymidine kinase. Incorporation of radioactivity from [5-3H]deoxycytidine into dCTP occurred almost exclusively in G1 cells. During S phase, de novo synthesis by ribonucleotide reductase was switched on, resulting in a 70-fold dilution of [3H]dCTP, confirming that ribonucleotide reductase is an S phase-specific enzyme, whereas deoxycytidine kinase is not. [5-3H]Cytidine appeared in dCTP almost to the same extent in G1 as in S phase, despite the S phase specificity of ribonucleotide reductase. During S phase, DNA replication greatly increased the turnover of dCTP, requiring a corresponding increase in ribonucleotide reductase activity. During G1, the enzyme maintained activity to provide dNTPs for DNA repair and mitochondrial DNA synthesis. The poor incorporation of isotope from deoxycytidine into DNA earlier led to the suggestion that the nucleoside is used only for DNA repair (Xu, Y-Z., Peng, H., and Plunkett, W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 631-637). The poor phosphorylation of deoxycytidine in S phase provides a better explanation

Mechanism of action of the monosialoganglioside GM1 as a modulator of CD4 expression. Evidence that GM1-CD4 interaction triggers dissociation of p56lck from CD4, and CD4 internalization and degradation.

Analyzing the mechanisms underlying the capability of the monosialoganglioside GM1 to induce CD4 modulation we observed that GM1 has a dual effect on the CD4 molecule. GM1 treatment of the lymphoma cell line MOLT-3 and CD4-transfected HeLa cells for times shorter than 30 min prevented binding of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) recognizing epitopes located within the first NH2-terminal domains of CD4, but not of the OKT4 mAb, which binds to the region of CD4 proximal to the transmembrane domain. However, no binding of the OKT4 mAb was observed after a few hours of treatment with GM1 in both MOLT-3 cells and HeLa cells transfected with an intact CD4 molecule, but not in HeLa cells transfected with a CD4 molecule lacking the bulk of the cytoplasmic domain, suggesting that modulation of CD4 by GM1 depends on the integrity of the cytoplasmic domain. GM1 treatment blocked binding of several mAbs which recognize epitopes located within the first two NH2-terminal domains of CD4 and did not induce CD4 down-modulation if MOLT-3 cells were preincubated with the OKT4A or the OKT4 mAbs. Immunoprecipitation studies with [35S]methionine-labeled MOLT-3 cells showed that GM1-induced CD4 down-modulation was accompanied by CD4 degradation, and this was preceded by dissociation of p56lck from CD4. GM1-induced CD4 down-modulation, dissociation of p56lck from CD4, and CD4 degradation were unaffected by staurosporine, which, on the contrary, blocked these events in response to phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. These observations demonstrate that the first action of GM1 is to mask epitopes located within the first two NH2-terminal domains; then, GM1 triggers protein kinase C-independent signals which cause p56lck dissociation from CD4 and the delivery of the molecule to an intracellular compartment where it is eventually degraded

HHV-8 transmission via saliva to soothe blood-sucking arthropod bites

The British Journal of Cance

Drop-out rate among patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma: Literature review and real-life experience

BACKGROUND: In patients with asthma, particularly severe asthma, poor adherence to inhaled drugs negatively affects the achievement of disease control. A better adherence rate is expected in the case of injected drugs, such as omalizumab, as they are administered only in a hospital setting. However, adherence to omalizumab has never been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to review the omalizumab drop-out rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies. A comparative analysis was performed between published data and the Italian North East Omalizumab Network (NEONet) database. RESULTS: In RCTs the drop-out rate ranged from 7.1 to 19.4 %. Although the reasons for withdrawal were only occasionally reported, patient decision and adverse events were the most frequently reported causes. In real-life studies the drop-out rate ranged from 0 to 45.5 %. In most cases lack of efficacy was responsible for treatment discontinuation. According to NEONet data, 32 % of treated patients dropped out, with an increasing number of drop outs observed over time. Patient decision and lack of efficacy accounted for most treatment withdrawals. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment adherence is particularly crucial in patients with severe asthma considering the clinical impact of the disease and the cost of non-adherence. The risk of treatment discontinuation has to be carefully considered both in the experimental and real-life settings. Increased knowledge regarding the main reasons for patient withdrawal is important to improve adherence in clinical practice

Drop-out rate among patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma: Literature review and real-life experience

In patients with asthma, particularly severe asthma, poor adherence to inhaled drugs negatively affects the achievement of disease control. A better adherence rate is expected in the case of injected drugs, such as omalizumab, as they are administered only in a hospital setting. However, adherence to omalizumab has never been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to review the omalizumab drop-out rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies. A comparative analysis was performed between published data and the Italian North East Omalizumab Network (NEONet) database

In Vitro and In Vivo Human Herpesvirus 8 Infection of Placenta

Herpesvirus infection of placenta may be harmful in pregnancy leading to disorders in fetal growth, premature delivery, miscarriage, or major congenital abnormalities. Although a correlation between human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection and abortion or low birth weight in children has been suggested, and rare cases of in utero or perinatal HHV-8 transmission have been documented, no direct evidence of HHV-8 infection of placenta has yet been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo susceptibility of placental cells to HHV-8 infection. Short-term infection assays were performed on placental chorionic villi isolated from term placentae. Qualitative and quantitative HHV-8 detection were performed by PCR and real-time PCR, and HHV-8 proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Term placenta samples from HHV-8-seropositive women were analyzed for the presence of HHV-8 DNA and antigens. In vitro infected histocultures showed increasing amounts of HHV-8 DNA in tissues and supernatants; cyto- and syncitiotrophoblasts, as well as endothelial cells, expressed latent and lytic viral antigens. Increased apoptotic phenomena were visualized by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine nick end-labeling method in infected histocultures. Ex vivo, HHV-8 DNA and a latent viral antigen were detected in placenta samples from HHV-8-seropositive women. These findings demonstrate that HHV-8, like other human herpesviruses, may infect placental cells in vitro and in vivo, thus providing evidence that this phenomenon might influence vertical transmission and pregnancy outcome in HHV-8-infected women

Adherence issues related to sublingual immunotherapy as perceived by allergists

Objectives: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy to treat allergic rhinitis and asthma, and is widely used in clinical practice in many European countries. The clinical efficacy of SLIT has been established in a number of clinical trials and meta-analyses. However, because SLIT is self-administered by patients without medical supervision, the degree of patient adherence with treatment is still a concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the perception by allergists of issues related to SLIT adherence. Methods: We performed a questionnaire-based survey of 296 Italian allergists, based on the adherence issues known from previous studies. The perception of importance of each item was assessed by a VAS scale ranging from 0 to 10. Results: Patient perception of clinical efficacy was considered the most important factor (ranked 1 by 54% of allergists), followed by the possibility of reimbursement (ranked 1 by 34%), and by the absence of side effects (ranked 1 by 21%). Patient education, regular follow-up, and ease of use of SLIT were ranked first by less than 20% of allergists. Conclusion: These findings indicate that clinical efficacy, cost, and side effects are perceived as the major issues influencing patient adherence to SLIT, and that further improvement of adherence is likely to be achieved by improving the patient information provided by prescribers. © 2010 Scurati et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd

A survey of clinical features of allergic rhinitis in adults

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) has high prevalence and substantial socio-economic burden. Material/Methods: The study included 35 Italian Centers recruiting an overall number of 3383 adult patients with rhinitis (48% males, 52% females, mean age 29.1, range 18\u201345 years). For each patient, the attending physician had to fill in a standardized questionnaire, covering, in particular, some issues such as the ARIA classification of allergic rhinitis (AR), the results of skin prick test (SPT), the kind of treatment, the response to treatment, and the satisfaction with treatment. Results: Out of the 3383 patients with rhinitis, 2788 (82.4%) had AR: 311 (11.5%) had a mild intermittent, 229 (8.8%) a mild persistent, 636 (23.5%) a moderate-severe intermittent, and 1518 (56.1%) a moderate-severe persistent form. The most frequently used drugs were oral antihistamines (77.1%) and topical corticosteroids (60.8%). The response to treatment was judged as excellent in 12.2%, good in 41.3%, fair in 31.2%, poor in 14.5%, and very bad in 0.8% of subjects. The rate of treatment dissatisfaction was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe AR than in patients with mild AR (p<0.0001). Indication to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was significantly more frequent (p<0.01) in patients with severe AR than with mild AR. . Conclusions: These fndings confirm the appropriateness of ARIA guidelines in classifying the AR patients and the association of severe symptoms with unsuccessful drug treatment. The optimal targeting of patients to be treated with AIT needs to be reassessed