Large genomic rearrangements in the CFTR gene contribute to CBAVD

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>By performing extensive scanning of whole coding and flanking sequences of the <it>CFTR (Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator</it>) gene, we had previously identified point mutations in 167 out of 182 (91.7%) males with isolated congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). Conventional PCR-based methods of mutation analysis do not detect gross DNA lesions. In this study, we looked for large rearrangements within the whole <it>CFTR </it>locus in the 32 CBAVD patients with only one or no mutation.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We developed a semi-quantitative fluorescent PCR assay (SQF-PCR), which relies on the comparison of the fluorescent profiles of multiplex PCR fragments obtained from different DNA samples. We confirmed the gross alterations by junction fragment amplification and identified their breakpoints by direct sequencing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We detected two large genomic heterozygous deletions, one encompassing exon 2 (c.54-5811_c.164+2186del8108ins182) [or <it>CFTRdele2</it>], the other removing exons 22 to 24 (c.3964-3890_c.4443+3143del9454ins5) [or <it>CFTRdele 22_24</it>], in two males carrying a typical CBAVD mutation on the other parental <it>CFTR </it>allele. We present the first bioinformatic tool for exon phasing of the <it>CFTR </it>gene, which can help to rename the exons and the nomenclature of small mutations according to international recommendations and to predict the consequence of large rearrangements on the open reading frame.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Identification of large rearrangements further expands the <it>CFTR </it>mutational spectrum in CBAVD and should now be systematically investigated. We have designed a simple test to specifically detect the presence or absence of the two rearrangements identified in this study.</p

Mosaicism for combined tetrasomy of chromosomes 8 and 18 in a dysmorphic child: A result of failed tetraploidy correction?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mosaic whole-chromosome tetrasomy has not previously been described as a cause of fetal malformations.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>In a markedly dysmorphic child with heart malformations and developmental delay, CGH analysis of newborn blood DNA suggested a 50% dose increase of chromosomes 8 and 18, despite a normal standard karyotype investigation. Subsequent FISH analysis revealed leukocytes with four chromosomes 8 and four chromosomes 18. The child's phenotype had resemblance to both mosaic trisomy 8 and mosaic trisomy 18. The double tetrasomy was caused by mitotic malsegregation of all four chromatids of both chromosome pairs. A possible origin of such an error is incomplete correction of a tetraploid state resulting from failed cytokinesis or mitotic slippage during early embryonic development.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This unique case suggests that embryonic cells may have a mechanism for tetraploidy correction that involves mitotic pairing of homologous chromosomes.</p

Are p.I148T, p.R74W and p.D1270N cystic fibrosis causing mutations ?

BACKGROUND: To contribute further to the classification of three CFTR amino acid changes (p.I148T, p.R74W and p.D1270N) either as CF or CBAVD-causing mutations or as neutral variations. METHODS: The CFTR genes from individuals who carried at least one of these changes were extensively scanned by a well established DGGE assay followed by direct sequencing and familial segregation analysis of mutations and polymorphisms. RESULTS: Four CF patients (out of 1238) originally identified as carrying the p.I148T mutation in trans with a CF mutation had a second mutation (c.3199del6 or a novel mutation c.3395insA) on the p.I148T allele. We demonstrate here that the deletion c.3199del6 can also be associated with CF without p.I148T. Three CBAVD patients originally identified with the complex allele p.R74W-p.D1270N were also carrying p.V201M on this allele, by contrast with non CF or asymptomatic individuals including the mother of a CF child, who were carrying p.R74W-p.D1270N alone. CONCLUSION: These findings question p.I148T or p.R74W-p.D1270N as causing by themselves CF or CBAVD and emphazises the necessity to perform a complete scanning of CFTR genes and to assign the parental alleles when novel missense mutations are identified