Functional and molecular identification of a transporter of psychotropic and drugs of abuse

Le système nerveux central est un organe privilégié et protégé, notamment grâce à l’existence des barrières histologiques entre le sang et les tissus nerveux. La barrière-hémato encéphalique (BHE) et la barrière hémato-rétinienne (BHR) séparent respectivement le parenchyme cérébral et la rétine des composés contenus dans l’espace vasculaire, grâce à l’expression de jonctions serrées et de transporteurs membranaires permettant une régulation spécifique des échanges entre le sang et le parenchyme nerveux. Ce travail a porté sur l’étude d’un nouveau transporteur de cations organiques mis en évidence fonctionnellement à la BHE de la souris. Ce transporteur appartenant très probablement à la superfamille des solute carrier (SLC), fonctionne comme un antiport proton. Actuellement, sa présence ne peut être démontrée que de façon fonctionnelle car son identité moléculaire est encore inconnue. Cet antiport proton constitue un nouvel acteur de la perméabilité cérébrale et ouvre une nouvelle voie d’accès au cerveau. Nous nous sommes tout d’abord attachés à approfondir les connaissances fonctionnelles de ce transporteur en étudiant de nouveaux substrats et tissus d’expression. Le transport cérébral de psychotropes a été étudié in vivo par la technique de perfusion carotidienne in situ chez la souris et in vitro grâce à une lignée de cellules endothéliales cérébrales humaines immortalisées (hCMEC/D3). Nous avons démontré que la haute perméabilité cérébrale de la cocaïne fait intervenir à la fois une diffusion passive et surtout une diffusion médiée par un antiport proton. La vitesse d’entrée des substances d’abus dans le cerveau est associée à un plus fort risque d’addiction et fait de ce transporteur un nouvel acteur critique de la régulation du passage cérébral. En effet, d’autres substances comme la nicotine et certaines amphétamines comme le MDPV et l'ecstasy sont également des substrats de cet antiport. Ce transporteur apparaît comme une cible pharmacologique potentielle dans la prise en charge de toxicomanies. Malgré la diversité chimique et pharmacologique d’interactions des composés avec cet antiport, les concentrations nécessaires pour l’inhiber dépassent celles retrouvées dans le sang. Pour aider l’identification d’inhibiteurs sélectifs et efficaces nous avons développé un modèle pharmacophorique d’inhibiteurs du transporteur à partir de données générées in vitro et de l’approche FLAPpharm. Ce modèle semble prédictif de nouveaux composés pouvant constituer de meilleurs inhibiteurs de ce transporteur. L’étude des échanges in vivo au niveau du tissu nerveux nous a menés à étudier l’impact de transporteurs ABC et de l’antiport-proton au niveau cérébral et rétinien à l’aide de substances spécifiques ou de substrats mixtes comme le vérapamil. L’antiport proton est fonctionnel au niveau de la BHR et transporte notamment la clonidine, le DPH et le vérapamil. Cependant, dans le cas d’un substrat mixte P-gp et SLC (ex : vérapamil), ce transport d’influx n’est visible à la BHE que lorsque la P-gp est neutralisée. Au contraire, à la BHR l’influx lié à cet SLC est visible naturellement. L’impact de la P-gp à la BHR étant 6.3-fois plus faible ce processus est probablement moins masqué. Cette étude illustre la difficulté actuelle de prédire l’impact fonctionnel d’un transporteur pour des substrats multi-spécifiques et l’existence d’une priorisation du transport. Enfin, nous avons essayé d’identifier l’antiport proton au niveau moléculaire par une méthode de photo-activation à l’aide d’un composé adapté. Cette méthode s’est avérée efficace pour fixer une molécule sur le transporteur, permettant par la suite de l’isoler plus facilement. En conclusion, ce travail a permis de mettre en évidence l’importance de l’antiport proton dans la distribution cérébrale de psychotropes et d’ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives dans l’addiction et la compréhension du transport de substrats multi-spécifiques.The central nervous system is a privilege organ protected by histological barriers between the blood and the nervous tissue. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) separate cerebral parenchyma and retina from the circulating blood and both express tight junctions and membrane transporters, allowing a precise regulation of the exchanges between the blood and nervous tissues. We studied a new cationic transporter functionally evidenced at the mouse BBB. This molecularly unknown transporter belong to the solute carrier super family (SLC) and is a proton antiporter. It could constitute a new actor in the cerebral permeability and may be a new brain access pathway. First, we worked on the functional identification studying new substrates and new localization. Psychotropic brain transport was studied in vivo by brain in situ perfusion on mouse and in vitro with human immortalized endothelial cells (hCMEC/D3). We showed that cocaine brain entry depends on passive diffusion but also mainly on a proton antiporter. Brain entry rate of drugs of abuse is associated with modulation of addiction liability, making this transporter a new component of brain entry of cocaine, and also nicotine and some amphetamines such as ecstasy and MDPV. This proton antiporter appears to be a new potential target in addiction. Various chemical entities interact with this transporter; however concentrations used to inhibit the transporter are much higher than the one possibly found in the blood. In order to help find or design new selective and potent inhibitors, we developed a pharmacophore model of the proton antiporter inhibitors using in vitro data and the FLAPpharm approach. The model predicts well new possible inhibitors of this transporter. We also studied the impact of the ABC transporters and the proton antiporter at the BBB and the BRB using specific or multi-specific substrates such as verapamil. The proton antiporter is functionally expressed at the BRB and transports clonidine, DPH and verapamil. However, for the multi-specific (P-gp and SLC) compound verapamil, influx transport by the proton antiporter is visible at the BBB only when P-gp efflux is neutralized. On the contrary, at the BRB, the proton antiporter influx is always visible. This is certainly due to the lower impact (by 6.3 fold) of P-gp at the BRB compared to the BBB. These results show the difficulty to predict the functional impact of a transporter for multi-specific compounds and a probable transport prioritization. Finally we worked on the molecular identification of the proton antiporter using a photolabeling method. This work evidenced the importance of the proton antiporter in the brain distribution of psychotropic and drugs of abuse and opened toward new perspectives in addiction and transport comprehension

Evaluation de l'activité et de l'expression des transporteurs hépatiques OATP1B1 et OATP1B3 (application de facteurs d'extrapolation aux simulations PBPK)

PARIS-BIUP (751062107) / SudocSudocFranceF

PBPK modeling of irbesartan: incorporation of hepatic uptake

International audienc

Pharmacophore-Based Discovery of Substrates of a Novel Drug/Proton-Antiporter in the Human Brain Endothelial hCMEC/D3 Cell Line

A drug/proton-antiporter, whose the molecular structure is still unknown, was previously evidenced at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) by functional experiments. The computational method could help in the identification of substrates of this solute carrier (SLC) transporter. Two pharmacophore models for substrates of this transporter using the FLAPpharm approach were developed. The trans-stimulation potency of 40 selected compounds for already known specific substrates ([3H]-clonidine) were determined and compared in the human brain endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3. Results. The two pharmacophore models obtained were used as templates to screen xenobiotic and endogenous compounds from four databases (e.g., Specs), and 45 hypothetical new candidates were tested to determine their substrate capacity. Psychoactive drugs such as antidepressants (e.g., imipramine, desipramine), antipsychotics/neuroleptics such as phenothiazine derivatives (chlorpromazine), sedatives anti-histamine-H1 drugs (promazine, promethazine, triprolidine, pheniramine), opiates/opioids (e.g., hydrocodone), trihexyphenidyl and sibutramine were correctly predicted as proton-antiporter substrates. The best performing pharmacophore model for the proton-antiporter substrates appeared as a good predictor of known substrates and allowed the identification of new substrate compounds. This model marks a new step in the characterization of this drug/proton-antiporter and will be of great use in uncovering its substrates and designing chemical entities with an improved influx capability to cross the BBB

Validation of a simple HPLC-UV method for rifampicin determination in plasma: Application to the study of rifampicin arteriovenous concentration gradient

International audienceIn clinical practice, rifampicin exposure is estimated from its concentration in venous blood samples. In this study, we hypothesized that differences in rifampicin concentration may exist between arterial and venous plasma. An HPLC-UV method for determining rifampicin concentration in plasma using rifapentine as an internal standard was validated. The method, which requires a simple protein precipitation procedure as sample preparation, was performed to compare venous and arterial plasma kinetics after a single therapeutic dose of rifampicin (8.6 mg/kg i.v, infused over 30 min) in baboons (n = 3). The method was linear from 0.1 to 40 ␮g mL −1 and all validation parameters fulfilled the international requirements. In baboons, rifampicin concentration in arterial plasma was higher than in venous plasma. Arterial C max was 2.1 ± 0.2 fold higher than venous C max. The area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 120 min was ∼80% higher in arterial plasma, indicating a significant arteriovenous concentration gradient in early rifampicin pharmacokinetics. Arterial and venous plasma concentrations obtained 6 h after rifampicin injection were not different. An important arteriovenous equilibration delay for rifampicin pharmacokinetics is reported. Determination in venous plasma concentrations may considerably underestimate rifampicin exposure to organs during the distribution phase

Diphenhydramine as a selective probe to study H + -antiporter function at the blood–brain barrier: Application to [ 11 C]diphenhydramine positron emission tomography imaging

International audienceDiphenhydramine, a sedative histamine H 1 -receptor (H 1 R) antagonist, was evaluated as a probe to measure drug/H + -antiporter function at the blood–brain barrier. In situ brain perfusion experiments in mice and rats showed that diphenhydramine transport at the blood–brain barrier was saturable, following Michaelis–Menten kinetics with a K m = 2.99 mM and V max = 179.5 nmol s −1 g −1 . In the pharmacological plasma concentration range the carrier-mediated component accounted for 77% of diphenhydramine influx while passive diffusion accounted for only 23%. [ 14 C]Diphenhydramine blood–brain barrier transport was proton and clonidine sensitive but was influenced by neither tetraethylammonium, a MATE1 (SLC47A1), and OCT/OCTN (SLC22A1-5) modulator, nor P-gp/Bcrp (ABCB 1a/1b /ABCG2) deficiency. Brain and plasma kinetics of [ 11 C]diphenhydramine were measured by positron emission tomography imaging in rats. [ 11 C]Diphenhydramine kinetics in different brain regions were not influenced by displacement with 1 mg kg −1 unlabeled diphenhydramine, indicating the specificity of the brain positron emission tomography signal for blood–brain barrier transport activity over binding to any central nervous system target in vivo. [ 11 C]Diphenhydramine radiometabolites were not detected in the brain 15 min after injection, allowing for the reliable calculation of [ 11 C]diphenhydramine brain uptake clearance (Cl up = 0.99 ± 0.18 mL min −1 cm −3 ). Diphenhydramine is a selective and specific H + -antiporter substrate. [ 11 C]Diphenhydramine positron emission tomography imaging offers a reliable and noninvasive method to evaluate H + -antiporter function at the blood–brain barrier

Carrier-Mediated Cocaine Transport at the Blood-Brain Barrier as a Putative Mechanism in Addiction Liability

International audienceBackground: The rate of entry of cocaine into the brain is a critical factor that influences neuronal plasticity and the development of cocaine addiction. Until now, passive diffusion has been considered the unique mechanism known by which cocaine crosses the blood-brain barrier. Methods: We reassessed mechanisms of transport of cocaine at the blood-brain barrier using a human cerebral capillary endothelial cell line (hCMEC/D3) and in situ mouse carotid perfusion. Results: Both in vivo and in vitro cocaine transport studies demonstrated the coexistence of a carrier-mediated process with passive diffusion. At pharmacological exposure level, passive diffusion of cocaine accounted for only 22.5% of the total cocaine influx in mice and 5.9% in hCMEC/D3 cells, whereas the carrier-mediated influx rate was 3.4 times greater than its passive diffusion rate in vivo. The functional identification of this carrier-mediated transport demonstrated the involvement of a proton antiporter that shared the properties of the previously characterized clonidine and nicotine transporter. The functionnal characterization suggests that the solute carrier (SLC) transporters Oct (Slc22a1-3), Mate (Slc47a1) and Octn (Slc22a4-5) are not involved in the cocaine transport in vivo and in vitro. Diphenhydramine, heroin, tramadol, cocaethylene, and norcocaine all strongly inhibited cocaine transport, unlike benzoylecgonine. Trans-stimulation studies indicated that diphenhydramine, nicotine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (ecstasy) and the cathinone compound 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) were also substrates of the cocaine transporter. Conclusions: Cocaine transport at the BBB involves a proton-antiporter flux that is quantitatively much more important than its passive diffusion. The molecular identification and characterization of this transporter will provide new tools to understand its role in addictive mechanisms

Impact of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier on the uptake of heroin and its main metabolites: behavioral effects and consequences on the transcriptional responses and reinforcing properties

International audienceTransport across the BBB is a determinant of the rate and extent of drug distribution in the brain. Heroin exerts its effects through its principal metabolites 6-monoacetyl-morphine (6-MAM) and morphine. Morphine is a known substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) at the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) however, little is known about the interaction of heroin and 6-MAM with P-gp