A dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of nisoldipine in effort angina: Duration and extent of antianginal effects

Maximal treadmill exercise testing at 1, 3 and 8 hours was used to assess the onset, duration and antianginal efficacy of the d1hydropyridine slow channel calciumblocking agent, nisoldipine, in an oral dose range of 5, 10 and 20 mg. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design was used involving 12 patients with stable effort angina. Exercise tolerance was significantly increased 3 hours after each dose, when the maximal beneficial effect occurred. The improvement was observed as early as 1 hour after the 10 and 20 mg dose, and persisted for 8 hours after the 20 mg dose. At 3 hours, the onset of an exercise-induced ST segment depression of 0.1 mV or greater was increased by 62 (p < 0.05), 75 (p < 0.01) and 117 seconds (p < 0.01) with the 5,10 and 20 mg dose of nisoldipine, respectively, compared with placebo. Similarly, time to onset of angina was significantly increased. The sum of exerciseinduced ST segment depression at peak exercise was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) from 8.7 ± 2.3 to 6.7 ± 1.8 and 6.4 ± 2.0 mm, respectively, after the 10 and 20 mg dose of nisoldipine. The rate-pressure product was significantly greater with nisoldipine than with placebo at the onset of ischemia and at peak exercise (22.8 ± 1.1 versus 20 ± 1.4 × 103 U for the 20 mg dose; p ± 0.01).Thus, nisoldipine is an effective antianginal agent with a rapid onset of action that improves exercise tolerance, increases angina threshold and persists for at least 8 hours after oral dosing

Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS): Comparability of 10 year survival in randomized and randomizable patients

AbstractThe Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) includes 780 patients with mild or moderate stable angina pectoris or asymptomatic survivors of a myocardial infarction who were randomized to either medical or surgical therapy and 1,319 patients who were eligible for randomization but were not randomized (randomizable patients). There were no substantial aggregate differences observed in any of the survival comparisons after 10 years of follow-up study between the randomized and randomizable patients assigned to the medical (79% versus 80%) or surgical (82% versus 81%) groups or in patient subgroups stratified according to coronary artery disease extent and left ventricular ejection fraction.Cox regression analyses were done with independent variables known to be predictors of survival, including surgical versus medical therapy and randomized versus randomizable group, to test the null hypothesis of a mortality difference between medical versus surgical assignment according to group assignment (randomized versus randomizable). In no case did the initial group category enter as a significant predictor of survival. The results in the randomizable group reinforce those in the randomized group with respect to the medical versus surgical comparison.Two subgroups are identified with a significant surgical advantage: 1) patients with proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis ≥70% and an ejection fraction < 0.50, and 2) patients with three vessel coronary artery disease and an ejection fraction < 0.50. In both groups, coronary bypass surgery had a statistically significant beneficial effect on survival (p < 0.05).After a decade of follow-up, the CASS randomizable patients confirm conclusions reached on the basis of the CASS randomized trial

Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome

In observational analyses, higher levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have been associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease events. However, whether raising HDL cholesterol levels therapeutically reduces cardiovascular risk remains uncertain. Inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) raises HDL cholesterol levels and might therefore improve cardiovascular outcomes

The Anti-Ischemic Mechanism of Action of Ranolazine in Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this explanatory analysis was to investigate the relationship between ST-segment depression and the rate-pressure product (RPP) during exercise to determine whether ranolazine's mechanism of action was related to a reduction in myocardial oxygen demand or preservation of myocardial oxygen supply. BACKGROUND: In patients with stable ischemic heart disease, ranolazine increases exercise duration and reduces maximal ST-segment depression while exerting minimal effects on heart rate and blood pressure, although its mechanism of action during exercise has not been investigated. METHODS: Patients with stable ischemic heart disease (n = 191) were randomly allocated to a 4-period, double-blind, balanced Latin square crossover study to receive placebo, and ranolazine 500, 1,000, and 1,500 mg twice daily (bid) for 1 week each. Exercise treadmill tests were performed at baseline and at the end of each treatment period. The RPP and ST-segment depression were assessed before starting exercise, at each stage of exercise, and at maximal exercise. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, ranolazine produced a dose-dependent reduction in ST-segment depression that became more marked as exercise-induced ischemia became more pronounced, associated with clinically minor decreases in heart rate and blood pressure. At 12-min exercise, the amount of ST-segment depression compared with placebo and controlled for RPP was reduced by 22.3% on ranolazine 500 mg bid (p = 0.137), by 35.4% on 1,000 mg bid (p = 0.005), and by 45.8% on 1,500 mg bid (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The progressive magnitude of ischemia reduction on ranolazine was proportionally more substantial than the minor reductions in heart rate or RPP, suggesting that ranolazine's beneficial mechanism of action is most likely primarily due to an improvement in regional coronary blood flow in areas of myocardial ischemia

Fecal Microbial and Metabolic Profiles in Dogs With Acute Diarrhea Receiving Either Fecal Microbiota Transplantation or Oral Metronidazole

The aim was to characterize differences in fecal consistency, and fecal microbiota and metabolome profiles in dogs with acute diarrhea (AD) treated with either fecal microbiota transplantation as enema (FMT;n = 11) or oral metronidazole (MET;n = 7) for 7 days. On days 0, 7, and 28 fecal samples were obtained. Fecal samples from healthy dogs (HC;n = 14) were used for comparison. Samples were analyzed by the previously validated qPCR based canine Dysbiosis Index (DI;increased values indicate microbiota dysbiosis) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The fecal metabolome was analyzed using a previously validated targeted canine assay for fecal unconjugated bile acids, and untargeted metabolomics. Fecal consistency improved significantly in dogs treated with FMT and MET by day 7 and day 28 (p < 0.01) compared to day 0. However, on day 28 fecal consistency was significantly better in FMT compared to MET (p = 0.040). At day 0, dogs with AD had an altered microbiota indicated by significantly increased DI, decreased alpha-diversity, and altered beta-diversity. In the FMT group, the DI decreased over time, while MET led to a significant increase in the dysbiosis index at day 7 and 28 compared to FMT. Sequencing data revealed that in FMT microbial diversity and beta-diversity was similar to HC at day 28, while in MET these parameters were still significantly different from HC. In dogs treated with FMT, a decrease in cholic acid and the percentage of primary bile acids was observed, whereas treatment with metronidazole led to an increase in cholic acid at day 7 and an increase in percentage of primary bile acids over time. Based on untargeted metabolomics, dogs with AD had an altered fecal metabolome compared to HC. Dogs treated with FMT clustered closer to HC at day 28, while dogs treated with MET did not. In this pilot study, dogs with AD had significant differences in fecal microbiota and metabolome profiles. Dogs treated with MET still had altered microbial and metabolic profiles at day 28 compared to dogs treated with FMT or healthy dogs

Commentary on key aspects of fecal microbiota transplantation in small animal practice

The gastrointestinal tract of dogs, cats, and other mammals including humans harbors millions of beneficial microorganisms that regulate and maintain health. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a procedure involving the administration of a fecal infusion from a healthy individual (donor) to a patient with disease to help improve health. Despite the effectiveness of FMT to treat intestinal disorders in humans, in particular recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, there is a paucity of scientific data regarding the application of FMT in veterinary patients. Here, we outline key aspects of FMT in small animal practice