7 research outputs found

    First Case of Q Fever Endocarditis Involving the Melody(A (R)) Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve in an Afebrile Child

    No full text
    International audienceIn this article we report the first case of Q fever endocarditis in a 13 years old child with a percutaneous pulmonary Melody(A (R)) valve. The patient had a new onset of Melody valve dysfunction associated with the combination of hepatosplenomegaly and pancytopenia but was afebrile. Although blood cultures were negative, we have further investigated in the direction of infective endocarditis by performing PCR detection and the serology of C. burnetii which were positive. A combination antibiotic therapy with doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine was started with good clinical evolution. Our case emphasizes the fact that any Melody valvular dysfuntion should be considered as a potential infective endocarditis despite the absence of typical bacterial features

    Validation of an echocardiographic multiparametric strategy to increase responders patients after cardiac resynchronization: a multicentre study.

    No full text
    International audienceAIMS: We sought to develop and validate a multiparametric algorithm by applying previously validated criteria to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response in a multicentre study. Thirty per cent of patients treated by CRT fail to respond to the treatment. Although dyssynchrony by echocardiography has been used to improve the selection of patients, the complexity of myocardial contraction has generated a moderate improvement using any of several individual parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred end-stage heart failure patients [NYHA 3-4 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)120 ms were included. Echocardiography analysis focused on the following parameters: atrioventricular dyssynchrony, interventricular dyssynchrony, and intraventricular dyssynchrony that integrated radial (PSAX M-mode) and longitudinal [tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)] evaluations for spatial (wall to wall) and temporal (wall end-systole to mitral valve opening) dyssynchrony diagnosis. Following CRT implantation, patients were monitored for 6 months with functional and echo evaluations defining responders by a 15% reduction in end-systolic volume. Mean QRS duration and LVEF were 152 +/- 17 ms and 25 +/- 8%. There was a CRT response in 57% of patients, independent of QRS width. Mean prevalence of positive criteria was 34 +/- 8%. Feasibility and variability averages were 81 +/- 20% and 9 +/- 4%. In a single parametric approach, ranges of sensitivities and specificities were 18-65% and 45-84% with a mean of 41% and 66%. A multiparametric approach by focusing on criteria combination decreased the mean rate of false-positive results to 14 +/- 12%, 5 +/- 4%, 2 +/- 2%, and 1 +/- 2% from one to four parameters, respectively. More than three parameters were associated with a specificity above 90% and a positive predictive value above 65%. Reproducibility of this global strategy was 91%. CONCLUSION: A multiparametric echocardiographic strategy based on the association of conventional criteria is a better indicator of CRT response than the existing single parametric approaches

    Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    No full text
    International audienceAims - To evaluate the benefit of adding Losartan to baseline therapy in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods and results - A double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, add on trial comparing Losartan (50 mg when 10 years old, and receiving standard therapy. 303 patients, mean age 29.9 years old, were randomized. The two groups were similar at baseline, 86% receiving β-blocker therapy. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. The evolution of aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva was not modified by the adjunction of Losartan, with a mean increase in aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva of 0.44 mm/year (s.e. = 0.07) (-0.043 z/year, s.e. = 0.04) in patients receiving Losartan and 0.51 mm/year (s.e. = 0.06) (-0.01 z/year, s.e. = 0.03) in those receiving placebo (P = 0.36 for the comparison on slopes in millimeter per year and P = 0.69 for the comparison on slopes on z-scores). Patients receiving Losartan had a slight but significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study (5 mmHg). During the study period, aortic surgery was performed in 28 patients (15 Losartan, 13 placebo), death occurred in 3 patients [0 Losartan, 3 placebo, sudden death (1) suicide (1) oesophagus cancer (1)]. Conclusion - Losartan was able to decrease blood pressure in patients with MFS but not to limit aortic dilatation during a 3-year period in patients >10 years old. β-Blocker therapy alone should therefore remain the standard first line therapy in these patients
    corecore