Improved stability of lipiodol-drug emulsion for transarterial chemoembolisation of hepatocellular carcinoma results in improved pharmacokinetic profile: Proof of concept using idarubicin

To investigate the relationship between the improved stability of an anticancer drug-lipiodol emulsion and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile for transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The stability of four doxorubicin- or idarubicin-lipiodol emulsions was evaluated over 7 days. PK and clinical data were recorded after TACE with the most stable emulsion in eight unresectable HCC patients, after institutional review board approval. The most stable emulsion was the one that combined idarubicin and lipiodol (1:2 v:v). At 7 days, the percentages of aqueous, persisting emulsion and oily phases were 50-0-50, 33-0-67, 31-39-30, and 10-90-0 for the doxorubicin-lipiodol (1:1 v:v), doxorubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v), idarubicin-lipiodol (1:1 v:v), and the idarubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v) emulsion, respectively. After TACE, mean idarubicin C-max and AUC(0-24h) were 12.5 +/- 9.4 ng/mL and 52 +/- 16 ng/mL*h. Within 24 h after injection, 40 % of the idarubicin was in the liver, either in vessels, tumours, or hepatocytes. During the 2 months after TACE, no clinical grade > 3 adverse events occurred. One complete response, five partial responses, one stabilisation, and one progression were observed at 2 months. This study showed a promising and favourable PK and safety profile for the idarubicin-lipiodol (1:2 v:v) emulsion for TACE. aEuro cent Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) regimens that improve survival in hepatocellular carcinoma are needed. aEuro cent Improved emulsion stability for TACE resulted in a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. aEuro cent Preliminary safety and efficacy data for the idarubicin-lipiodol emulsion for TACE were encouraging

Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years.

BACKGROUND: The erosion of the early mortality advantage of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm remains without a satisfactory explanation. METHODS: An individual-patient data meta-analysis of four multicentre randomized trials of EVAR versus open repair was conducted to a prespecified analysis plan, reporting on mortality, aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 2783 patients, with 14 245 person-years of follow-up (median 5·5 years). Early (0-6 months after randomization) mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (46 of 1393 versus 73 of 1390 deaths; pooled hazard ratio 0·61, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·89; P = 0·010), primarily because 30-day operative mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (16 deaths versus 40 for open repair; pooled odds ratio 0·40, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·74). Later (within 3 years) the survival curves converged, remaining converged to 8 years. Beyond 3 years, aneurysm-related mortality was significantly higher in the EVAR groups (19 deaths versus 3 for open repair; pooled hazard ratio 5·16, 1·49 to 17·89; P = 0·010). Patients with moderate renal dysfunction or previous coronary artery disease had no early survival advantage under EVAR. Those with peripheral artery disease had lower mortality under open repair (39 deaths versus 62 for EVAR; P = 0·022) in the period from 6 months to 4 years after randomization. CONCLUSION: The early survival advantage in the EVAR group, and its subsequent erosion, were confirmed. Over 5 years, patients of marginal fitness had no early survival advantage from EVAR compared with open repair. Aneurysm-related mortality and patients with low ankle : brachial pressure index contributed to the erosion of the early survival advantage for the EVAR group. Trial registration numbers: EVAR-1, ISRCTN55703451; DREAM (Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management), NCT00421330; ACE (Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale, Chirurgie versus Endoprothèse), NCT00224718; OVER (Open Versus Endovascular Repair Trial for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms), NCT00094575