Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive update of the outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). DATA SOURCES: An extensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library was conducted. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All studies published after 2000 reporting on complications or functional outcome after a primary open IPAA procedure for UC or FAP were selected. Study characteristics, functional outcome, and complications were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: A review with similar methodology conducted 10 years earlier was used to evaluate developments in outcome over time. Pooled estimates were compared using a random-effects logistic meta-analyzing technique. Analyses focusing on the effect of time of study conductance, centralization, and variation in surgical techniques were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies including 14,966 patients were included. Pooled rates of pouch failure and pelvic sepsis were 4.3% (95% CI, 3.5-6.3) and 7.5% (95% CI 6.1-9.1), respectively. Compared to studies published before 2000, a reduction of 2.5% was observed in the pouch failure rate (p = 0.0038). Analysis on the effect of the time of study conductance confirmed a decline in pouch failure. Functional outcome remained stable over time, with a 24-h defecation frequency of 5.9 (95% CI, 5.0-6.9). Technical surgery aspects did not have an important effect on outcome. CONCLUSION: This review provides up to date outcome estimates of the IPAA procedure that can be useful as reference values for practice and research. It is also shows a reduction in pouch failure over time.1 juli 201

Effect of Digital Care Platforms on Quality of Care for Oncological Patients and Barriers and Facilitators for Their Implementation: Systematic Review

BackgroundOncological health care services are challenged by the increasing number of cancer survivors, long-term follow-up care, and fragmentation of care. Digital care platforms are potential tools to deliver affordable, patient-centered oncological care. Previous reviews evaluated only one feature of a digital care platform or did not evaluate the effect on enhancement of information, self-efficacy, continuity of care, or patient- and health care provider–reported experiences. Additionally, they have not focused on the barriers and facilitators for implementation of a digital care platform in oncological care. ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to collect the best available evidence of the effect of a digital care platform on quality of care parameters such as enhancement of available information, self-efficacy, continuity of care, and patient- and health care provider–reported experiences. Additionally, barriers and facilitators for implementation of digital care platforms were analyzed. MethodsThe PubMed (Medline), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for the period from January 2000 to May 2020 for studies assessing the effect of a digital care platform on the predefined outcome parameters in oncological patients and studies describing barriers and facilitators for implementation. Synthesis of the results was performed qualitatively. Barriers and facilitators were categorized according to the framework of Grol and Wensing. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for critical appraisal of the studies. ResultsSeventeen studies were included for final analysis, comprising 8 clinical studies on the effectiveness of the digital care platform and 13 studies describing barriers and facilitators. Usage of a digital care platform appeared to enhance the availability of information and self-efficacy. There were no data available on the effect of a digital care platform on the continuity of care. However, based on focus group interviews, digital care platforms could potentially improve continuity of care by optimizing the exchange of patient information across institutes. Patient-reported experiences such as satisfaction with the platform were considerably positive. Most barriers for implementation were identified at the professional level, such as the concern for increased workload and unattended release of medical information to patients. Most facilitators were found at the patient and innovation levels, such as improved patient-doctor communication and patient empowerment. There were few barriers and facilitators mentioned at the economic and political levels. ConclusionsThe use of digital care platforms is associated with better quality of care through enhancement of availability of information and increased self-efficacy for oncological patients. The numerous facilitators identified at the patient level illustrate that patients are positive toward a digital care platform. However, despite these favorable results, robust evidence concerning the effectiveness of digital care platforms, especially from high-quality studies, is still lacking. Future studies should therefore aim to further investigate the effectiveness of digital care platforms, and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation at the economic and political levels

Paracetamol does not compromise early wound repair in the intestine or abdominal wall in the rat

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Paracetamol is a cornerstone for perioperative pain relief. Its mechanism of action may include a local anti-inflammatory effect with inhibition of cyclooxygenase isoenzymes. The scarce literature available on its effects on wound healing consists of preclinical studies into the effect of paracetamol on healing of the musculoskeletal system. Although the drug is used abundantly for pain relief after surgery of the gastrointestinal tract, there are no published data on the influence of paracetamol on anastomotic and abdominal healing. This also holds for the crucial, early inflammatory phase of repair. The recovery of wound strength could therefore conceivably be affected by paracetamol. METHODS: In 78 male Wistar rats, we constructed an anastomosis in colon and ileum. The rats received either low- or high-dose (50 or 200 mg/kg/d, divided over 2 doses) paracetamol or vehicle (controls) until they were killed on day 3 or 7 after surgery (n = 13 each). In anastomoses, the main outcome variables were 2 independent measures for wound strength, bursting pressure, and breaking strength, the latter being the primary outcome variable. In addition, collagen levels were measured and histology was performed. In fascia, breaking strength was analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between control and paracetamol-treated groups at any time point for any of the variables. Wound strength increased significantly from day 3 to day 7 in all groups. In the colon anastomosis, the breaking strength increased from 130 +/- 9 g (mean +/- SEM) at day 3 to 232 +/- 17 g at day 7 in the control group, from 144 +/- 10 to 224 +/- 9 g in the low-dose group, and from 130 +/- 12 to 263 +/- 28 g in the high-dose group. The lower limit for the 95% confidence interval was -11 for the difference between control and low-dose groups at day 3 and -25 for the difference between control and high-dose groups. No differences in collagen levels were found between the high-dose and control groups. Histology did not indicate the presence of gross differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative use of paracetamol in a rat model of intestinal surgery does not significantly impede wound repair in the early postoperative period