Expresión clínica del Síndrome de Sjögren primario en pacientes adultos diagnosticados a edad menor o igual a 35 años versus mayores de 35 años

Objetivo: describir y comparar las manifestaciones clínicas en pacientes adultos diagnosticados con Síndrome de Sjögren primario (SSp) a edad menor o igual a 35 años versus mayores a 35 años. Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron pacientes mayores de 18 años de edad, con diagnóstico de SSp de acuerdo a los criterios de clasificación ACR - EULAR 2002 / 2016, registrados en la base de datos GESSAR (Grupo de Estudio Síndrome de Sjögren Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología). Resultados: se incluyeron 665 pacientes. Cien (15,04%) con edad al diagnóstico ≤ 35 años, 92% mujeres. El promedio de edad del grupo > 35 años, fue de 54 + 11 años, 96% mujeres. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre 35 años, en xeroftalmia (90,72% vs 95,64%, p: 0,04) y xerodermia (42,35% vs 57,36%, p: 0,03) y en los siguientes dominios del ESSDAI (EULAR Activity Index for primary Sjögren’s syndrome) sistema nervioso periférico (4,05 vs 11,32, p: 0,03), respiratorio (6% vs 15,40%, p: 0,01) y renal (6% vs 1,59%, p: 0,02). Conclusión: Nuestro estudio sugiere un menor compromiso glandular en pacientes con SSp diagnosticados a menor edad, sin un patrón diferencial característico en cuanto al compromiso sistémico

Características clínicas y evolución de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico en Argentina: datos del registro nacional SAR-COVID

Introducción: el lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) es una enfermedad sistémica que se ha asociado a mayor severidad con la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Particularmente la alta actividad de la enfermedad y algunos inmunosupresores se han vinculado a peores desenlaces. Objetivos: describir las características por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con LES en Argentina del registro SAR-COVID y establecer los factores asociados a peor desenlace de la misma. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes con diagnóstico de LES con infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR y/o serología positiva) del registro SAR-COVID. Los datos se recolectaron desde agosto de 2020 hasta marzo de 2022. El desenlace de la infección se midió mediante la escala ordinal de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (EO-OMS). Se definió COVID-19 severo con un valor EO-OMS ≥5. Análisis descriptivo, test T de Student, U de Mann Whitney U, ANOVA, chi2 y Fisher. Regresión logística múltiple. Resultados: se incluyeron 399 pacientes, el 93% de sexo femenino, con una edad media de 40,9 años (DE 12,2). El 39,6% tenía al menos una comorbilidad. Al momento de la infección, el 54,9% recibía glucocorticoides, el 30,8% inmunosupresores y el 3,3% agentes biológicos. La infección por SARS-CoV-2 fue leve en la mayoría de los casos, mientras que un 4,6% tuvo curso severo y/o falleció. Estos últimos presentaban comorbilidades, usaban glucocorticoides y tenían síndrome antifosfolípido (SAF) con mayor frecuencia y mayor actividad de la enfermedad al momento de la infección. En el análisis multivariado, la hipertensión arterial, el diagnóstico de SAF y el uso de glucocorticoides se asociaron a hospitalización severa y/o muerte por COVID-19 (EO-OMS ≥5). Conclusiones: en esta cohorte de pacientes con LES con infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada, la mayoría cursó de manera sintomática, un 22,1% fue hospitalizado y un 5% requirió ventilación mecánica. La mortalidad fue cercana al 3%. El diagnóstico de SAF, tener hipertensión arterial y el uso de glucocorticoides se asociaron significativamente con COVID-19 severo

Latitude gradient influences the age of onset of rheumatoid arthritis : a worldwide survey

The age of onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an important outcome predictor. Northern countries report an age of RA onset of around 50 years, but apparently, variability exists across different geographical regions. The objective of the present study is to assess whether the age of onset of RA varies across latitudes worldwide. In a proof-of-concept cross-sectional worldwide survey, rheumatologists from preselected cities interviewed 20 consecutive RA patients regarding the date of RA onset (RAO, when the patient first noted a swollen joint). Other studied variables included location of each city, rheumatologist settings, latitudes (10A degrees increments, south to north), longitudes (three regions), intracountry consistency, and countries' Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI). Data from 2481 patients (82% females) were obtained from 126 rheumatologists in 77 cities of 41 countries. Worldwide mean age of RAO was 44 +/- 14 years (95% CI 44-45). In 28% of patients, RA began before age 36 years and before age 46 years in 50% of patients. RAO was 8 years earlier around the Tropic of Cancer when compared with northern latitudes (p <0.001, 95% CI 3.5-13). Multivariate analysis showed that females, western cities, and latitudes around the Tropic of Cancer are associated with younger age of RAO (R (2) 0.045, p <0.001). A positive correlation was found between the age of RAO and IHDI (r = 0.7, p <0.01, R (2) 0.5). RA often begins at an early age and onset varies across latitudes worldwide. We postulate that countries' developmental status and their geographical and geomagnetic location influence the age of RAO.Peer reviewe

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from the KEEPsAKE 2 study

Objective: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease in which the skin and joints are affected. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or two biologic therapies (Bio-IR) or one or more conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. Methods: In the ongoing, phase 3, KEEPsAKE 2 trial, patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 (period 1). At week 24 (period 2), patients who received placebo were switched to risankizumab, and all patients received risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks from weeks 28-208. Results: At week 24, 51.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (N = 224) achieved ?20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) vs 26.5% of placebo-treated patients (N = 220; P < 0.001). At week 52, 58.5% of patients randomized to receive continuous risankizumab achieved ACR20, and 55.7% of patients who switched from placebo to risankizumab at week 24 achieved ACR20. Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Rates of serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation remained stable through week 52, and no deaths were reported. Conclusion: Risankizumab was well tolerated and improved symptoms of PsA in Bio-IR/csDMARD-IR patients, with a consistent long-term safety profile from weeks 24-52.Funding: This work was supported by AbbVie, Inc. (North Chicago, IL, USA) Acknowledgements: AbbVie Inc. participated in the study design; study research; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; and writing, reviewing and approving this manuscript. All authors had access to the data and participated in the development, review, approval and decision to submit this manuscript for publication. AbbVie and the authors thank all study investigators for their contributions and the patients who participated in this study. Medical writing support, funded by AbbVie, was provided by Spencer Hughes, PhD, Jay Parekh, PharmD, and Melissa Julyanti, PharmD, of JB Ashtin, who developed the manuscript based on an author-approved outline and assisted in implementing author revisions throughout the editorial process. JB Ashtin adheres to Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations. Disclosure statement: A.Ö. has received speaker or consulting fees and/or research grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. F.V.dB. has received speaker and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. K.P. has received honoraria or fees for serving on advisory boards, as a speaker, and as a consultant, as well as grants as principal investigator from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bausch Health (Valeant), Baxalta, Baxter, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Coherus, Dermira, EMD Serono, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin, Lilly, LEO Pharma, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Stiefel, Sun Pharma, Takeda and UCB. C.A. has received honoraria or fees for serving on advisory boards or as a speaker, as well as research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche and R-Pharm. R.B. has received grants or research support from AbbVie, Merck and Roche. He has received consultation fees or honoraria for serving as a speaker for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer and Roche. J.A. has received grants or research support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos/Gilead, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Mallinckrodt, Nektar Therapeutics, Nichi-Iko, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Selecta Biosciences and UCB. W.L., A.E., and B.P. are fulltime employees of AbbVie, and may hold AbbVie stock or stock options. A.M.S. is a full-time employee of AbbVie, may hold AbbVie stock or stock options and is a co-inventor on AbbVie patents. Z.W. is a former employee of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock. A.K. is a shareholder of or has received honoraria or fees as a consultant, speaker, or expert witness for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Flexion, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma and UCB

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis : 24-week results from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial

Objectives Risankizumab is an interleukin-23 inhibitor under study for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The phase 3 KEEPsAKE 2 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of risankizumab versus placebo in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response or intolerance to = 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). Results through week 24 are reported here. Methods Adults with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR were randomised to receive subcutaneously administered risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 during a 24-week, double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved >= 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology score (ACR20) at week 24. Secondary endpoints assessed key domains of PsA and patient-reported outcomes. Results A total of 444 patients (median age 53 years, range 23-84 years) were randomised to risankizumab (n=224) or placebo (n=220); 206 patients (46.5%) were Bio-IR. At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving risankizumab achieved the primary endpoint of ACR20 (51.3% vs 26.5%, p<0.001) and all secondary endpoints (p<0.05) compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were reported for 4.0% and 5.5% of risankizumab-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively; serious infections were reported for 0.9% and 2.3%, respectively. Conclusion Treatment with risankizumab resulted in significant improvements versus placebo in key disease outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with PsA who were Bio-IR and/or csDMARD-IR.arthritis; arthritis; psoriatic; biological therap