362 research outputs found

    Phase II trial of biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Southwest Oncology Group study S0329

    Full text link
    Background A phase I study and an institutional pilot study in patients with metastatic/recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) utilizing biweekly gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GEMTAX), showed an overall response rate of 53%. 1 This phase II trial was conducted to determine the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of this combination. Methods Patients with metastatic/recurrent SCCHN were treated with gemcitabine (3000 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 of every 28‐day cycle. Results In 57 patients with measurable disease, median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 4 months and median overall survival (OS) was 8 months. Overall response rate of 28% and disease stabilization in 19% were seen. There were no treatment‐related deaths with grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity seen in 20% of the patients. Conclusion Biweekly GEMTAX is feasible, well tolerated, and demonstrated reasonable efficacy. This may be an alternative for patients who are not candidates for platinum‐based chemotherapy. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 1712–1717, 2014Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109649/1/hed23522.pd

    A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

    Get PDF
    This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m−2 by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1–9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m−2. Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1–50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4–52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h−1 m−2 and an area under the curve of 6.00 μg ml−1 h−1 was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

    Nucleocytoplasmic transport: a thermodynamic mechanism

    Full text link
    The nuclear pore supports molecular communication between cytoplasm and nucleus in eukaryotic cells. Selective transport of proteins is mediated by soluble receptors, whose regulation by the small GTPase Ran leads to cargo accumulation in, or depletion from the nucleus, i.e., nuclear import or nuclear export. We consider the operation of this transport system by a combined analytical and experimental approach. Provocative predictions of a simple model were tested using cell-free nuclei reconstituted in Xenopus egg extract, a system well suited to quantitative studies. We found that accumulation capacity is limited, so that introduction of one import cargo leads to egress of another. Clearly, the pore per se does not determine transport directionality. Moreover, different cargo reach a similar ratio of nuclear to cytoplasmic concentration in steady-state. The model shows that this ratio should in fact be independent of the receptor-cargo affinity, though kinetics may be strongly influenced. Numerical conservation of the system components highlights a conflict between the observations and the popular concept of transport cycles. We suggest that chemical partitioning provides a framework to understand the capacity to generate concentration gradients by equilibration of the receptor-cargo intermediary.Comment: in press at HFSP Journal, vol 3 16 text pages, 1 table, 4 figures, plus Supplementary Material include
    corecore