The evolution of the ventilatory ratio is a prognostic factor in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients

Background: Mortality due to COVID-19 is high, especially in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The purpose of the study is to investigate associations between mortality and variables measured during the first three days of mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 intubated at ICU admission. Methods: Multicenter, observational, cohort study includes consecutive patients with COVID-19 admitted to 44 Spanish ICUs between February 25 and July 31, 2020, who required intubation at ICU admission and mechanical ventilation for more than three days. We collected demographic and clinical data prior to admission; information about clinical evolution at days 1 and 3 of mechanical ventilation; and outcomes. Results: Of the 2,095 patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, 1,118 (53.3%) were intubated at day 1 and remained under mechanical ventilation at day three. From days 1 to 3, PaO2/FiO2 increased from 115.6 [80.0-171.2] to 180.0 [135.4-227.9] mmHg and the ventilatory ratio from 1.73 [1.33-2.25] to 1.96 [1.61-2.40]. In-hospital mortality was 38.7%. A higher increase between ICU admission and day 3 in the ventilatory ratio (OR 1.04 [CI 1.01-1.07], p = 0.030) and creatinine levels (OR 1.05 [CI 1.01-1.09], p = 0.005) and a lower increase in platelet counts (OR 0.96 [CI 0.93-1.00], p = 0.037) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. No association between mortality and the PaO2/FiO2 variation was observed (OR 0.99 [CI 0.95 to 1.02], p = 0.47). Conclusions: Higher ventilatory ratio and its increase at day 3 is associated with mortality in patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation at ICU admission. No association was found in the PaO2/FiO2 variation

Belatacept in kidney transplant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objectives: Lupus nephritis (LN) requires renal replacement therapy in 10%-30% of patients. About 30% of these patients receive a kidney transplant. Belatacept is a second-generation, selective, T-cell co-stimulator blocker (inhibits cytotoxic, T-lymphocyte antigen 4, CTLA-4) used as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for maintenance regimens after kidney transplantation. The pathogenic relevance of CTLA-4 inhibition and the favourable cardiovascular profile of belatacept make it an attractive therapeutic option in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Intravenous administration of belatacept ensures therapeutic adherence. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study evaluates the outcomes of LN kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept for reasons not related to SLE at the Columbia University Lupus and Renal Transplant Cohort. Results: Belatacept was started in six patients on CNI regimens at 15.5±17.1 months following transplantation for LN. In five patients, creatinine levels stabilised 6 months after belatacept, one returned to haemodialysis due to CNI toxicity and pyelonephritis and one relisted for a kidney transplant following acute cellular rejection and cortical necrosis. Five patients are followed for extrarenal lupus; no extrarenal manifestations were documented in the other two patients. Data on SLE disease activity pre-belatacept and post-belatacept were available and scored in three patients using the SLE Disease Activity Index Glucocorticosteroid Index (SLEDAI-2KG), which accounts for clinical and laboratory manifestations, as well as steroid dose. Mean SLEDAI-2KG decreased from 13 to 7.6. Conclusion: Belatacept in LN kidney transplant recipients may decrease extrarenal manifestations, attenuate CNI toxicity and stabilise allograft function, providing a better alternative to CNI regimens. Furthermore, these data suggest that belatacept, although initiated for reasons not related to SLE, might have a beneficial effect in SLE

Successful treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus pleuropericarditis with belimumab

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a wide variety of manifestations and a difficult disease control in some patients. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman who presented with a flare of SLE including arthritis and pleuropericarditis that responded to neither leflunomide, methotrexate, nor high doses of prednisone. After initiating treatment with belimumab, the patient experienced a quick and notorious improvement. She remains stable to this day while continuing belimumab therapy

Serum Advanced Glycation End Products and Their Soluble Receptor as New Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

It has been postulated that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and their soluble receptor (sRAGE) may play a relevant role as inducers in the chronic inflammatory pathway in various conditions, among them, in immune-mediated diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, previous studies show conflicting results about their association with SLE characteristics and their usefulness as disease biomarkers. We aimed to study the association of specific serum AGEs (pentosidine, Nξ-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), Nξ-(carboxyethyl)lysine (CEL)), sRAGE levels and AGEs (specific serum AGEs and skin AGEs) to sRAGE ratios with various disease parameters, in order to clarify their potential as new biomarkers in SLE and to study their relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD). To this aim, serum pentosidine, CML, CEL and sRAGE were measured via ELISA, and skin AGEs levels were measured by skin autofluorescence. Correlations of pentosidine levels with demographic and clinical data, indexes of activity, accrual damage and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed through multiple linear regression models, while correlations of the rest of the AGEs, sRAGE and AGE to sRAGE ratios (non-normal) were analyzed using both an OLS regression model and a GML. All of the analyses were adjusted for confounders. A total of 119 SLE patients were recruited. Serum AGEs and sRAGEs were significantly associated with SLE activity indexes and/or demographic or disease characteristics: pentosidine with pulmonary manifestations; CML with anti-dsDNA antibodies, IL-6, disease duration and non-Caucasian ethnicities; CEL with anti-dsDNA antibodies, IL-6 and accumulated number of manifestations; and sRAGE with male gender, photosensitivity and being on specific immunosuppressants. These results suggest that the AGE-sRAGE axis may serve as a novel biomarker for managing and prognosticating this disease. Its correlation with certain antibodies, demographics and disease presentations may indicate a distinct clinical phenotype associated with varying levels of AGEs and/or sRAGE. The significance of specific AGE/sRAGE ratios, introduced in this study for the first time, warrants additional investigation in forthcoming research. Our study did not confirm the link between serum AGEs and CVD, which merits further exploration through studies designed for this specific purpose

Myo-Spain: Spanish Registry of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Methodology

Objetivos Describir la metodología del Registro de pacientes con miopatía inflamatoria idiopática (MII) de España (Myo-Spain), así como sus fortalezas y limitaciones. El objetivo principal del proyecto es analizar la evolución y el manejo clínico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII. Material y método Estudio observacional, longitudinal, ambispectivo y multicéntrico de una cohorte de pacientes con MII atendidos en servicios de reumatología de España. Se incluirán todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de MII en seguimiento habitual por los centros participantes, sin tener en cuenta la edad de inicio del proceso. Los casos incidentes serán todos los pacientes que al inicio del estudio en cada centro estén diagnosticados desde hace menos de 12 meses y casos prevalentes desde hace más de 12 meses. Se construirá un registro en el que se incluirán los datos de la visita basal, del año y dos años. Se recogerán variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, analíticas, complicaciones, comorbilidad, asociación con otras enfermedades reumáticas, ingresos hospitalarios, mortalidad y tratamientos. Además, se determinarán índices, escalas y cuestionarios de actividad, afectación muscular, daño, discapacidad y calidad de vida. El periodo de reclutamiento será de 23 meses. El propósito es conseguir una cohorte de 400 pacientes con MII. Conclusiones El estudio Myo-Spain constituye la oportunidad para desarrollar una cohorte de pacientes incidentes y prevalentes con MII en España. Myo-Spain permitirá evaluar en detalle, las características clínicas de la enfermedad en diferentes momentos. Se espera que la información exhaustiva recogida en las visitas suponga una amplia fuente de datos para futuros análisis.Objectives: To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM. Methods: Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM. Conclusions: Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis.Sin financiaciónNo data JCR 20210.311 SJR (2021) Q3, 44/61 RheumatologyNo data IDR 2020UE

POS0907 Association between disease activity and damage in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Differences between incident and prevalent cases

Background There are different measures and tools validated to evaluate disease activity and damage in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Disease activity and damage in patients with early diagnosis is not still well defined. Objectives To analyze disease activity outcomes and their association with damage in IIM differentiating between incident and prevalent cases. Methods Multicenter cross-sectional study of a cohort of patients included in the Spanish Registry of patients with IIM (Myo-Spain)(1). Patients were classified as incident cohort (time between diagnosis and study initiation ≤ 12 months) or prevalent cohort (> 12 months). Activity and damage data were collected at the initial visit. Differences between both groups were tested by Chi-square, Student’s t and Mann-Whitney tests. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (Rho) were used to analyze correlations between disease activity and damage measures (weak ≥ 0.2 - <0.3; moderate ≥ 0.3 <0.7; strong ≥ 0.7). Results We included 139 (67.63% women) and 417 patients (74.34% women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 54 and 48 years in the incident and prevalent cohort, respectively. Patients in the incident cohort had significantly higher disease activity measures: myositis disease activity assessment visual analogue scale (MYOACT) total, extramuscular activity of MYOACT, physician global activity (PhGA), patient global activity (PGA), manual muscle testing (MMT)8, CK, and HAQ (p 0.2). Correlations between disease activity and damage measures are showed in the Table 1. The main differences found between both cohorts were the correlations of PhGA, CK, PGD and MDI with other measures of disease activity.Sin financiación27.973 JCR (2021) Q1, 3/34 Rheumatology5.366 SJR (2021) Q1, 7/274 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)No data IDR 2020UE

Does expert opinion match the definition of lupus low disease activity state? Prospective analysis of 500 patients from a Spanish multicentre cohort.

To apply the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) definition within a large cohort of patients and to assess the agreement between the LLDAS and the physician's subjective evaluation of lupus activity. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicentre study of SLE patients. We applied the LLDAS and assessed whether there was agreement with the clinical status according to the physician's opinion. A total of 508 patients [92% women; mean age 50.4 years (s.d. 3.7)] were recruited and 304 (62.7%) patients were in the LLDAS. According to physician assessment, 430 (86.1%) patients were classified as remission or low activity. Overall agreement between both evaluations was 71.4% (95% CI: 70.1, 70.5) with a Cohen's κ of 0.3 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.22-0.37]. Most cases (96.1%) in the LLDAS were classified as remission or low activity by the expert. Of the patients who did not fulfil the LLDAS, 126 (70.4%) were classified as having remission/low disease activity. The main reasons for these discrepancies were the presence of new manifestations compared with the previous visit and a SLEDAI 2K score >4, mainly based on serological activity. Almost two-thirds of SLE patients were in the LLDAS. There was a fair correlation between the LLDAS and the physician's evaluation. This agreement improves for patients fulfilling the LLDAS criteria. The discordance between both at defining lupus low activity, the demonstrated association of the LLDAS with better outcomes and the fact that the LLDAS is more stringent than the physician's opinion imply that we should use the LLDAS as a treat-to-target goal

Does expert opinion match the definition of Lupus Low Disease Activity State? prospective analysis of 500 patients from a Spanish multicentre cohort

Data de publicació electrònica: 12-08-2022Objectives: To apply Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) definition within a large cohort of patients and to assess the agreement between the LLDAS and the physician's subjective evaluation of lupus activity. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of a prospective multicentre study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients. We applied the LLDAS and assessed whether there was agreement with the clinical status according to the physiciańs opinion. Results: 508 patients (92% women; mean age (±SD): 50.4 years (± 13.7)). A total of 304 (62.7%) patients were in LLDAS. According to physician assessment, 430 patients (86,1%) were classified as remission or low activity. Overall agreement between both evaluations was 71.4% (95% CI: 70.1-70.5%) with a Coheńs kappa of 0.3 (0.22-0.37). Most cases (96.1%) in LLDAS were classified as remission or low activity by the expert. Of the patients that did not fulfill LLDAS, 126 (70.4%) were classified as having remission/low disease activity. The main reasons for these discrepancies were the presence of new manifestations compared with the previous visit and a SLEDAI 2-K > 4, mainly based on serological activity. Conclusions: Almost two thirds of SLE patients were in LLDAS. There was a fair correlation between LLDAS and the physician's evaluation. This agreement improves for patients fulfilling the LLDAS criteria. The discordance between both at defining lupus low activity, the demonstrated association of LLDAS with better outcomes and the fact that LLDAS is more stringent than physician's opinion imply that we should use the LLDAS as a treat to target goal

Role of Advanced Glycation End Products as New Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) may play a relevant role as inducers in the chronic inflammatory pathway present in immune-mediated diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). AGEs concentrations have been associated, with discrepant results to date, with some parameters such as disease activity or accrual damage, suggesting their potential usefulness as biomarkers of the disease. Our objectives are to confirm differences in AGEs levels measured by cutaneous autofluorescence between SLE patients and healthy controls (HC) and to study their correlation with various disease parameters. Cross-sectional study, where AGEs levels were measured by skin autofluorescence, and SLE patients’ data were compared with those of sex- and age-matched HC in a 1:3 proportion through a multiple linear regression model. Associations of AGEs levels with demographic and clinical data were analyzed through ANOVA tests. Both analyses were adjusted for confounders. AGEs levels in SLE patients were significantly higher than in HC (p < 0.001). We found statistically significant positive associations with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and damage index (SDI), physician and patient global assessment, C-reactive protein, leukocyturia, complement C4, IL-6 and oral ulcers. We also found a negative statistically significant association with current positivity of anti-nuclear and anti-Ro60 antibodies. AGEs seem to have a contribution in LES pathophysiology, being associated with activity and damage and having a role as a new management and prognosis biomarker in this disease. The association with specific antibodies and disease manifestations may indicate a specific clinical phenotype related to higher or lower AGEs levels

Does remission in systemic lupus erythematosus according to the 2021 DORIS definition match the treating rheumatologist's judgement?

Objectives: To assess agreement between the 2021 Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) and physician-judged lupus activity. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of data from a Spanish prospective multicentre study of SLE patients. We applied the 2021 DORIS criteria and assessed whether remission status based on this definition agreed with remission as per physician clinical judgement and reasons for disagreement between them. Results: Out of 508 patients [92% women; mean age (s.d.): 50.4 years (13.7)] studied, 267 (54.4%) met the criteria for 2021 DORIS remission. Based on physicians' judgement, 277 (55.9%) patients were classified as in remission or serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ). The overall rate of agreement between these assessments was 81.2% (95% CI: 79.9, 82.9%) with a Cohen's kappa of 0.62 (0.55-0.69). Overall, 46 (9.1%) patients were classified as in remission/SACQ by rheumatologists but did not meet the 2021 DORIS criteria for remission. The main reasons for discrepancies were a clinical SLE Disease Activity Index (cSLEDAI) score >0 in 39 patients, a Physician Global Assessment score >0.5 in five patients, and prednisone >5 mg/day in another five patients. Conclusions: The 2021 DORIS remission is an achievable target in clinical practice. There is substantial agreement between the DORIS definition and physician-judged remission. The discordance was mainly due to physicians classifying some patients with ongoing mild disease activity as in remission. Thus, the standardized DORIS definition should be used to define the target in a treat-to-target strategy for the management of SLE