4 research outputs found

    Dise帽o de una estructura organizacional para la administraci贸n tributaria ecuatoriana

    Get PDF
    Desde los a帽os setenta, los gobiernos centrales de Am茅rica Latina, en su proceso de hacer frente a las crisis fiscales, implementaron las m谩s grandes reformas tributarias, enfocadas principalmente, en reformas legales. Con sistemas tributarios m谩s s贸lidos, desde los a帽os noventa la preocupaci贸n se enmarc贸 en las estructuras organizacionales que estas administraciones deber铆an tener. En el caso ecuatoriano, a finales de los a帽os noventa se implant贸 una importante reforma del sistema tributario, tanto en el 谩mbito normativo, como en la administraci贸n de los tributos internos; pues a partir del a帽o 1999 se crea, por Ley, una administraci贸n tributaria aut贸noma, en reemplazo de la Direcci贸n General de Rentas (unidad org谩nica del Ministerio de Finanzas), iniciando as铆 un proceso total de cambio en la pol铆tica tributaria. En la actualidad, la estructura organizacional de la administraci贸n ecuatoriana es r铆gida y no ajusta a las tendencias de las administraciones m谩s desarrolladas, sobre todo en lo referente a los procesos primarios de una administraci贸n, los procesos del control tributario. En este sentido, este trabajo recoge en primer lugar el marco te贸rico existente sobre las consideraciones que los responsables de una administraci贸n tributaria deber铆an tener en cuenta al momento de definir su estructura, posteriormente analiza las tendencias de las administraciones m谩s desarrolladas respecto a las definiciones de sus unidades de control y por 煤ltimo plantea una estructura adecuada, ajustada a las mejores pr谩cticas internacionales y a las circunstancias especiales del Ecuador, para una redefinici贸n de las unidades de control, tanto de la administraci贸n central como de las administraciones regionales. En la propuesta elaborada, se considera una Direcci贸n Nacional que, mediante dos unidades principales, administre los procesos relacionados con los servicios y el control tributario, y que a diferencia de la situaci贸n actual, su estructura sea matricial en lugar de funcional

    Tratado de fiscalidad internacional para el Ecuador

    Get PDF
    Aborda cuestiones de orden general sobre la problem谩tica tributaria internacional. Se enfoca en diversas estrategias que a nivel comparado se han dise帽ado y se est谩n aplicando para luchar contra el fraude y la evasi贸n fiscal internacionales. Contiene escritos que explican algunas cuestiones propias de la tributaci贸n de sectores econ贸micos espec铆ficos. Este tratado est谩 enfocado al estudio de la Fiscalidad Internacional desde la perspectiva ecuatoriana

    Global economic burden of unmet surgical need for appendicitis

    No full text
    Background There is a substantial gap in provision of adequate surgical care in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the economic burden of unmet surgical need for the common condition of appendicitis. Methods Data on the incidence of appendicitis from 170 countries and two different approaches were used to estimate numbers of patients who do not receive surgery: as a fixed proportion of the total unmet surgical need per country (approach 1); and based on country income status (approach 2). Indirect costs with current levels of access and local quality, and those if quality were at the standards of high-income countries, were estimated. A human capital approach was applied, focusing on the economic burden resulting from premature death and absenteeism. Results Excess mortality was 4185 per 100 000 cases of appendicitis using approach 1 and 3448 per 100 000 using approach 2. The economic burden of continuing current levels of access and local quality was US 92492millionusingapproach1and92 492 million using approach 1 and 73 141 million using approach 2. The economic burden of not providing surgical care to the standards of high-income countries was 95004millionusingapproach1and95 004 million using approach 1 and 75 666 million using approach 2. The largest share of these costs resulted from premature death (97.7 per cent) and lack of access (97.0 per cent) in contrast to lack of quality. Conclusion For a comparatively non-complex emergency condition such as appendicitis, increasing access to care should be prioritized. Although improving quality of care should not be neglected, increasing provision of care at current standards could reduce societal costs substantially

    Global economic burden of unmet surgical need for appendicitis

    No full text
    Background There is a substantial gap in provision of adequate surgical care in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify the economic burden of unmet surgical need for the common condition of appendicitis. Methods Data on the incidence of appendicitis from 170 countries and two different approaches were used to estimate numbers of patients who do not receive surgery: as a fixed proportion of the total unmet surgical need per country (approach 1); and based on country income status (approach 2). Indirect costs with current levels of access and local quality, and those if quality were at the standards of high-income countries, were estimated. A human capital approach was applied, focusing on the economic burden resulting from premature death and absenteeism. Results Excess mortality was 4185 per 100 000 cases of appendicitis using approach 1 and 3448 per 100 000 using approach 2. The economic burden of continuing current levels of access and local quality was US 92492millionusingapproach1and92 492 million using approach 1 and 73 141 million using approach 2. The economic burden of not providing surgical care to the standards of high-income countries was 95004millionusingapproach1and95 004 million using approach 1 and 75 666 million using approach 2. The largest share of these costs resulted from premature death (97.7 per cent) and lack of access (97.0 per cent) in contrast to lack of quality. Conclusion For a comparatively non-complex emergency condition such as appendicitis, increasing access to care should be prioritized. Although improving quality of care should not be neglected, increasing provision of care at current standards could reduce societal costs substantially
    corecore