Is there an optimal chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer that will provide a platform for the introduction of new biological agents

Abstract Globally, gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death. The majority of gastric cancer patients will have at presentation or will ultimately develop overt metastatic disease. Meta-analysis has demonstrated not only that systemic chemotherapy can improve survival in patients with advanced disease but also that the best survival results in earlier randomized studies have been achieved with three-drug regimens containing a fluoropyrimidine, an anthracycline, and cisplatin. Although there has been little progress historically in improving median overall survival times beyond the 9-month plateau achievable with the standard epirubicin–cisplatin–infusional 5-fluoropyrimidine (ECF) combination, the availability of newer cytotoxic anticancer agents has provided some measure of optimism that current outcomes can be improved. A number of new triplet and doublet combinations incorporating docetaxel, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, capecitabine, and S-1 have been explored in randomized trials. Although some combinations, such as epirubicin–oxaliplatin–capecitabine, have been shown to be as effective as (or perhaps more effective than) ECF, and although promising early data have been derived for S-1 in combination with cisplatin, a lack of studies in which direct comparisons have been made currently hinders the identification of the optimal regimen in this setting. One factor that might contribute to the lack of clear progress is the absence of consensus on the utility of second-line cytotoxic treatments. It can therefore be concluded that, although there is no first-line regimen that is clearly the most appropriate platform for the investigation of biological agents, there are a number of combinations that have been shown to be effective and therefore good candidates

Clinical, Pathological and Prognostic Features of Rare BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis (REBUS Study)

Simple SummarySomatic BRAF mutations occur in approximately 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) and, according to the involved codon, are classified as V600E and in non-V600, accounting for 80% and 20%, respectively. Being the most frequent mutation, the BRAF V600E mutation has been extensively investigated and up to now its clinical, pathological and molecular phenotype and its prognostic impact have been clearly described. On the contrary, evidence concerning BRAF non-V600 is weaker. We retrospectively evaluated 537 mCRC patients treated at two Italian Institutions. This study corroborates and strengthens available evidence concerning phenotype and prognostic performance of BRAF non-V600 compared to BRAF V600E and BRAF wild-type mCRCs. This deeper insight on rare BRAF non-V600 mutated mCRC is a primary issue in the precision oncology era, since the wider application of NGS is expected to increase the identification of those aberrations.Recently, retrospective analysis began to shed light on metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) harboring rare BRAF non-V600 mutations, documenting a distinct phenotype and a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to confirm features and prognosis of rare BRAF non-V600 mCRCs compared to BRAF V600E and BRAF wild-type mCRCs treated at two Italian Institutions. Overall, 537 cases were retrospectively evaluated: 221 RAS/BRAF wild-type, 261 RAS mutated, 46 BRAF V600E and 9 BRAF non-V600. Compared to BRAF V600E mCRC, BRAF non-V600 mCRC were more frequently left-sided, had a lower tumor burden and displayed a lower grade and an MMR proficient/MSS status. In addition, non-V600 mCRC patients underwent more frequently to resection of metastases with radical intent. Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly longer in the non-V600 compared to the V600E group. At multivariate analysis, only age < 65 years and ECOG PS 0 were identified as independent predictors of better OS. BRAF V600E mCRCs showed a statistically significant worse mOS when compared to BRAF wild-type mCRCs, whereas no significant difference was observed between BRAF non-V600 and BRAF wild-type mCRCs. Our study corroborates available evidence concerning incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of BRAF-mutated mCRCs

Quality of life of palliative chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction treated with irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid: results of a randomised phase III trial

41st Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology -- MAY 13-17, 2005 -- Orlando, FLWOS: 000268881000007PubMed ID: 19568958The quality of life (QL) of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving irinotecan, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (IF arm) or cisplatin with 5-FU (CF arm) is presented. Patients with measurable or evaluable advanced gastric cancer received IF weekly for 6/7 weeks or CF q4 weeks. QL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, subsequently every 8 weeks until progression and thereafter every 3 months until death. The QL data were analysed using several statistical methods including summary measures and pattern-mixture modelling. A total of 333 patients were randomised and treated (IF 170, CF 163). The time-to-progression for IF and CF was 5.0 and 4.2 months (P = 0.088), respectively. The overall compliance rates for QL questionnaire completion were 60 and 56% in the IF and CF arms, respectively. Significant treatment differences were observed for the physical functioning scale (P = 0.024), nausea\vomiting (P = 0.001) and EQ-5D thermometer (P = 0.020) in favour of the IF treatment arm. There was a trend in favour of IF over CF in time-to-progression. The IF group also demonstrated a better safety profile than CF and a better QL on a number of multi-item scales, suggesting that IF offers an alternative first-line platinum-free treatment option for advanced gastric cancer.Amer Soc Clin Onco

Upfront Modified Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab Versus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin Plus Panitumumab for Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Phase III TRIPLETE Study by GONO

PURPOSE To verify whether the intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone with a modified schedule of modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFOXIRI) increases the activity of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin when both regimens are combined with panitumumab as initial treatment for RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).METHODS TRIPLETE was a prospective, open-label, phase III trial in which previously untreated patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to modified FOLFOX/panitumumab (control group) or mFOLFOXIRI/panitumumab (experimental group) up to 12 cycles, followed by fluorouracil/-leucovorin/panitumumab until disease progression. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1. Hypothesizing an ORR of 60% in the control group, 432 cases provided 90% power to a two-sided chi-square test for heterogeneity with a two-sided alpha error of .05 to detect >= 15% differences between arms (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03231722).RESULTS From September 2017 to September 2021, 435 patients were enrolled (control group/experimental group: 217/218) in 57 Italian sites. One hundred sixty (73%) patients treated with mFOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab and 165 (76%) patients treated with modified FOLFOX plus panitumumab achieved RECIST response (odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.34, P= .526). No differences in early tumor shrinkage rate (57%/58%, P = .878) and deepness of response (median: 48%/47%, P = .845) were reported, nor in RO resection rate (25%/29%, P = .317). No significant difference between arms was reported in terms of progression-free survival (median progression-free survival: 12.7 in the experimental group v 12.3 months in the control group, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.11, P = .277).CONCLUSION The intensification of the upfront chemotherapy backbone in combination with panitumumab does not provide additional benefit in terms of treatment activity at the price of increased gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with RAS and BRAF wt mCRC. (C) 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncolog

Translational regulation of a novel testis-specific RNF4 transcript.

The RING-finger protein SNURF/RNF4, a modulator of both steroid receptor dependent and basal transcription, is expressed at very high levels in testis and at much lower levels in several other tissues. In somatic tissues, the RNF4 gene is expressed as a 3-kb transcript while an additional shorter sized transcript (1.6 kb) was found in mouse testis. In murine germ cells, RNF4 protein expression is strongly modulated during progression of spermatogonia to spermatids, with a peak in spermatocytes. The expression of 3-kb transcript correlated with protein levels in the different germ cell populations. Conversely, the 1.6-kb transcript was abundantly and specifically expressed in spermatids, in which RNF4 protein was detected at very low levels. We have then examined possible mechanisms underlying this discrepancy. Primer extension and RNase protection analyses demonstrated that the 1.6- and 3.0-kb transcripts originate from the same promoter, encode for the same protein and differ in the 3' UTR. In vitro assays showed that protein degradation is not involved in the regulation of RNF4 protein level. Finally, polysome analysis revealed that only a slight fraction of the testis-specific transcript is engaged in translation, thus providing a feasible mechanism for the quantitative differences of RNF4 mRNA and protein levels. Present results demonstrate that RNF4 short transcript is poorly translated suggesting that this mechanism could be essential for normal spermatogenesis. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Gynecological Malignancies in Albania: The Challenges of Cancer Care in a Low Resource Country

Objective: This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current state of gynecological cancers in Albania, including their epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. It also aims to highlight the challenges that Albanian patients face in accessing appropriate treatment and to discuss the importance of data collection. This is the first comprehensive review of gynecological cancers in Albania. Mechanism: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various databases to identify relevant studies and government reports. Government reports were used to supplement the data obtained from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and provide additional insights into the challenges and limitations of cancer data collection in Albania. Findings in Brief: Albania has a population of 1.18 million women aged 15 years and older who are at risk of developing gynecological cancers. The most prevalent gynecological cancers among Albanian women are endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. Cervical cancer accounts for 30% of all gynecological cancers and is the main cause of cancer-related mortality in this group. Albanian women are at a lower risk of developing gynecological cancers than women in neighboring countries. The main risk factors for gynecological cancers in Albanian women include increasing age, obesity, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. However, no data are available on germline mutations associated with a hereditary risk of developing gynecological cancers. Recently, Albania has introduced a cervical cancer screening program along with HPV vaccination. Nonetheless, owing to lack of awareness and education about the disease and limited access to early screening programs, gynecological cancers are often detected at later stages. Treatment options for gynecological cancers in Albania remain largely unchanged and have not adapted to new molecular classification methods that could affect treatment decisions. Furthermore, new therapeutic options, such as immunotherapy and targeted agents, are not commonly used for gynecological cancers in Albania. Conclusions: Gynecological cancers remain a significant public health issue in Albania. Urgent action is needed to address the increasing burden of gynecological cancers, including investment in cancer control strategies, primary prevention, early detection, treatment, healthcare infrastructure, capacity building, and research to address specific national needs and implement evidence-based policies

Gastric Cancer, Immunotherapy, and Nutrition: The Role of Microbiota

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of gastric cancer (GC), which still represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. However, ICI treatment outcomes vary between individuals and need to be optimized. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota could represent a key influencer of immunotherapy responses. At the same time, the nutritional status and diet of GC patients are also predictive of immunotherapy treatment response and survival outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to gather recent findings about the complex relationships between the oral, gastric, and gut bacterial communities, dietary factors/nutritional parameters, and immunotherapy responses. Perigastric/gut microbiota compositions/functions and their metabolites could be predictive of response to immunotherapy in GC patients and even overall survival. At the same time, the strong influence of diet on the composition of the microbiota could have consequences on immunotherapy responses through the impact of muscle mass in GC patients during immunotherapy. Future studies are needed to define more precisely the dietary factors, such as adequate daily intake of prebiotics, that could counteract the dysbiosis of the GC microbiota and the impaired nutritional status, improving the clinical outcomes of GC patients during immunotherapy