Two unusual cases of Gitelman's syndrome with a complex inheritance: how the phenotype can help interpret the genotype: lesson for the clinical nephrologist

Bartter\u2019s syndrome (BS) and Gitelman\u2019s syndrome (GS) are autosomal recessive disorders with overlapping features, caused by biallelic variants in six genes encoding proteins involved in renal electrolyte homeostasis in different districts of the nephron. Here we describe two patients with a clinical diagnosis of GS with a complex inheritance whose clinical interpretation and treatment proved challenging. In one patient, compound heterozygosity for two known pathogenic variant in the SLC12A3 gene was associated with an uncommon variant in the KCNJ1 gene (one of the known BS genes). The unusual severity of GS phenotype encountered in this patient led us to hypothesize that the missense variant can act as a genetic modifier by exacerbating the severity of the disease and by inducing BS-like clinical manifestations. In the other patient, two novel likely pathogenic variants in the SLC12A3 gene were coupled with a hitherto unreported rare variant in the SLC4A1 gene; the latter\u2019s disease-causing variants have been associated with both dominant and recessive forms of distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA). Patient\u2019s medical history (he was clinically diagnosed with incomplete hypokalemic dRTA at 10 years old) supports the hypothesis of a dual molecular diagnosis and hence of a blended phenotype

[Appropriateness criteria for the management of anticoagulant therapy in complex patients with atrial fibrillation. The opinion of a group of expert Italian cardiologists]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia often associated with high thromboembolic risk. The purpose of this position paper is to provide clinicians with recommendations useful in managing some important issues regarding the use of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF in particularly complex clinical situations.The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, validated to combine the best available scientific evidence with the collective judgment of experts, was used to assess the judgment of an expert panel of cardiologists. To this purpose, the benefit-to-harm ratio of 37 clinical scenarios was rated. Each indication was classified as "appropriate", "uncertain", or "inappropriate" in accordance with the panelists' median score.The present document reports the results of this consensus process, which led to the development of recommendations for clinical practice on how to use anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF in complex clinical settings, including the presence of comorbidities, cardioversion, or ablation. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are a valid alternative to vitamin K antagonists in preventing embolic events in patients with non-valvular AF, particularly in case of clinical complexity

Predictors of Left Ventricular Scar Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Athletes With Apparently Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias

Background In athletes with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and otherwise unremarkable clinical findings, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may reveal concealed pathological substrates. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate which VA characteristics predicted CMR abnormalities. Methods and Results We enrolled 251 consecutive competitive athletes (74% males, median age 25 [17-39] years) who underwent CMR for evaluation of VA. We included athletes with >100 premature ventricular beats/24 h or 651 repetitive VA (couplets, triplets, or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) on 12-lead 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and negative family history, ECG, and echocardiogram. Features of VA that were evaluated included number, morphology, repetitivity, and response to exercise testing. Left-ventricular late gadolinium-enhancement was documented by CMR in 28 (11%) athletes, mostly (n=25) with a subepicardial/midmyocardial stria pattern. On 24-hour ECG monitoring, premature ventricular beats with multiple morphologies or with right-bundle-branch-block and intermediate/superior axis configuration were documented in 25 (89%) athletes with versus 58 (26%) without late gadolinium-enhancement (P<0.001). More than 3300 premature ventricular beats were recorded in 4 (14%) athletes with versus 117 (53%) without positive CMR (P<0.001). At exercise testing, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurred at peak of exercise in 8 (29%) athletes with late gadolinium-enhancement (polymorphic in 6/8, 75%) versus 17 athletes (8%) without late gadolinium-enhancement (P=0.002), (P<0.0001). At multivariable analysis, all 3 parameters independently correlated with CMR abnormalities. Conclusions In athletes with apparently idiopathic VA, simple characteristics such as number and morphology of premature ventricular beats on 12-lead 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and response to exercise testing predicted the presence of concealed myocardial abnormalities on CMR. These findings may help cost-effective CMR prescription

[Appropriateness criteria for the treatment of atrial fibrillation with dronedarone: practical issues. An Italian cardiologists' expert opinion]

Antiarrhythmic agents are among the therapeutic options available for the treatment of atrial fibrillation when a rhythm control strategy is required. Although their efficacy seems to be generally comparable to that of nonpharmacological interventions, the use of these agents remains controversial. In particular, among this class of drugs, the use of dronedarone in clinical practice is a matter of debate. In this paper, the authors aimed to address these issues, involving a team of expert cardiologists who discussed about the potential use of dronedarone in different clinical scenarios. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to develop appropriateness measures for the optimal management of patients treated with dronedarone, by combining the best available scientific evidence with the collective judgment of experts. To this purpose, a group of experts was identified and asked to rate the benefit-to-harm ratio of 52 clinical scenarios. Each indication was classified as "appropriate", "uncertain" or "inappropriate" in accordance with the panelists' median score. The classification of each scenario has led to the development of several recommendations for clinical practice. The use of dronedarone for the management of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation has evolved over time: this antiarrhythmic drug appears to be useful not only in monitoring symptoms, but also in reducing hospitalization and mortality rates in patients with atrial fibrillation

Combining Home Monitoring temporal trends from implanted defibrillators and baseline patient risk profile to predict heart failure hospitalizations: results from the SELENE HF study

We developed and validated an algorithm for prediction of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations using remote monitoring (RM) data transmitted by implanted defibrillators

Differences between familial and sporadic dilated cardiomyopathy: ESC EORP Cardiomyopathy & Myocarditis registry

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complex disease where genetics interplay with extrinsic factors. This study aims to compare the phenotype, management, and outcome of familial DCM (FDCM) and non-familial (sporadic) DCM (SDCM) across Europe

Changes in surgicaL behaviOrs dUring the CoviD-19 pandemic. The SICE CLOUD19 Study

BACKGROUND: The spread of the SARS-CoV2 virus, which causes COVID-19 disease, profoundly impacted the surgical community. Recommendations have been published to manage patients needing surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey, under the aegis of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, aims to analyze how Italian surgeons have changed their practice during the pandemic.METHODS: The authors designed an online survey that was circulated for completion to the Italian departments of general surgery registered in the Italian Ministry of Health database in December 2020. Questions were divided into three sections: hospital organization, screening policies, and safety profile of the surgical operation. The investigation periods were divided into the Italian pandemic phases I (March-May 2020), II (June-September 2020), and III (October-December 2020).RESULTS: Of 447 invited departments, 226 answered the survey. Most hospitals were treating both COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. The reduction in effective beds dedicated to surgical activity was significant, affecting 59% of the responding units. 12.4% of the respondents in phase I, 2.6% in phase II, and 7.7% in phase III reported that their surgical unit had been closed. 51.4%, 23.5%, and 47.8% of the respondents had at least one colleague reassigned to non-surgical COVID-19 activities during the three phases. There has been a reduction in elective (>200 procedures: 2.1%, 20.6% and 9.9% in the three phases, respectively) and emergency (<20 procedures: 43.3%, 27.1%, 36.5% in the three phases, respectively) surgical activity. The use of laparoscopy also had a setback in phase I (25.8% performed less than 20% of elective procedures through laparoscopy). 60.6% of the respondents used a smoke evacuation device during laparoscopy in phase I, 61.6% in phase II, and 64.2% in phase III. Almost all responders (82.8% vs. 93.2% vs. 92.7%) in each analyzed period did not modify or reduce the use of high-energy devices.CONCLUSION: This survey offers three faithful snapshots of how the surgical community has reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic during its three phases. The significant reduction in surgical activity indicates that better health policies and more evidence-based guidelines are needed to make up for lost time and surgery not performed during the pandemic