Outer membrane phospholipase A's roles in Helicobacter pylori acid adaptation

Contains fulltext : 174211.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: The pH of the human gastric mucosa varies around 2.5 so that only bacteria with strong acidic stress tolerance can colonize it. The ulcer causing Helicobacter pylori thrives in the gastric mucosa. We analyse the roles of the key outer membrane protein OMPLA in its roles in acid tolerance. RESULTS: The homology model of Helicobacter pylori outer membrane phospholipase A (OMPLA) reveals a twelve stranded beta-barrel with a pore that allows molecules to pass with a diameter up to 4 A. Structure based multiple sequence alignments revealed the functional roles of many amino acids, and led to the suggestion that OMPLA has multiple functions. Besides its role as phospholipase it lets urea enter and ammonium exit the periplasm. Combined with an extensive literature study, our work leads to a comprehensive model for H. pylori's acid tolerance. This model is based on the conversion of urea into ammonium, and it includes multiple roles for OMPLA and involves two hitherto little studied membrane channels in the OMPLA operon. CONCLUSION: The three-dimensional model of OMPLA predicts a transmembrane pore that can aid H. pylori's acid tolerance through urea influx and ammonium efflux. After urea passes through OMPLA into the periplasm, it passes through the pH-gated inner membrane channel UreI into the cytoplasm where urease hydrolyses it into NH3 and CO2. Most of the NH3 becomes NH4+ that is likely to need an inner membrane channel to reach the periplasm. Two genes that are co-regulated with OMPLA in gastric Helicobacter operons could aid this transport. The NH4+ that might leave the cell through the OMPLA pore has been implicated in H. pylor's pathogenesis

Rapid molecular identification of Neisseria meningitidis isolates using the polymerase chain reaction followed by single-stranded conformation polymorphism analysis

Typing of Neisseria meningitidis strains is currently performed with conventional and molecular methods. Our objectives were: first, to develop a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by single-stranded conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of the PorA gene (VR1 region) to distinguish N. meningitidis subtypes and second, to evaluate the method for the identification and characterization of N. meningitidis in patient specimens. SSCP analysis of the VR1 region of the PorA1/2 gene from 126 N. meningitidis strains and 29 clinical samples identified seven SSCP types (SP-1 to SP-7); four strains were not typeable by the method. Classification according to the SSCP methods and serosubtype agreed for 122 of the 126 typeable strains (96.8%). For the 24-culture positive clinical samples, serosubtype and SSCP agreed in all cases. Five samples, which were culture-negative but obtained from children during an apparent outbreak of meningococcal disease in a primary school, presented identical SSCP classification for each sample (SP-2). PCR-SSCP is a rapid and cost-effective method for typing N. meningitidis strains that could provide important early information in the surveillance of suspected meningococcal outbreaks, particularly when culture-negative specimens constitutes the main source of material to analyze. © 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Patterns of antigenic diversity and the mechanisms that maintain them

Many of the remaining challenges in infectious disease control involve pathogens that fail to elicit long-lasting immunity in their hosts. Antigenic variation is a common reason for this failure and a contributor to the complexity of vaccine design. Diversifying selection by the host immune system is commonly, and often correctly, invoked to explain antigenic variability in pathogens. However, there is a wide variety of patterns of antigenic variation across space and time, and within and between hosts, and we do not yet understand the determinants of these different patterns. This review describes five such patterns, taking as examples two bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis), two viruses (influenza A and HIV-1), as well as the pathogens (taken as a group) for which antigenic variation is negligible. Pathogen-specific explanations for these patterns of diversity are critically evaluated, and the patterns are compared against predictions of theoretical models for antigenic diversity. Major remaining challenges are highlighted, including the identification of key protective antigens in bacteria, the design of vaccines to combat antigenic variability for viruses and the development of more systematic explanations for patterns of antigenic variation