16 research outputs found
Authors' Reply “Comments: Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions”
'Formidável contágio': epidemias, trabalho e recrutamento na Amazônia colonial (1660-1750)
O império dos mil anos e a arte do "tempo barroco": a águia bicéfala como emblema da Cristandade
O princípio da inderrogabilidade singular : uma análise à luz da atividade de classificação e qualificação do solo
Evaluation of the accuracy of mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in suspect breast lesions
OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer diagnosis, mammography (MMG), ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the imaging methods most used. There is a scarcity of comparative studies that evaluate the accuracy of these methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out through the review of electronic medical records of 32 female patients who underwent breast imaging examinations at a imaging diagnostic center in Teresina, State of Piauı´, Brazil. Patients who had these three imaging methods at the time of the evaluation of the same nodule were included. The nodule must have been classified as suspect by the BI-RADSs system in at least one of the methods. Data from each method were compared with the histopathological examination. Statistical analysis used the calculation of proportions in Excel 2010. RESULTS: MMG showed 56.2%, 87.5%, 81.8%, 66.7% and 71.8% of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy, respectively. USG had 75%, 18.8%, 48%, 42.8% and 46.9% of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively. In turn, MRI had 100%, 50%, 66.7%, 100% and 75% of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thus, MRI and MMG were more accurate in evaluating suspicious breast lumps. MRI had a low specificity, mainly to high breast density, while MMG had also sensitivity limited due to high breast density and USG has been proven to be useful in these patients
Manifestações musculoesqueléticas em pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise
As anormalidades musculoesqueléticas em pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise são numerosas e freqüentes, sendo mais prevalentes naqueles em tratamento dialítico de longa duração. A artralgia é o sintoma mais comum, ocorrendo em mais de 70% dos pacientes. O hiperparatireoidismo secundário é a principal causa da doença renal óssea, e as manifestações clínicas são: dor óssea, artralgia e prurido. A amiloidose, decorrente da deposição de proteína beta2-microglobulina nos tecidos, manifesta-se pela presença de ombro doloroso, síndrome do túnel do carpo, dedo em gatilho, ruptura espontânea de tendão e fratura patológica. Outras manifestações musculoesqueléticas observadas são a artrite induzida por cristais, necrose avascular, artrite séptica, fraqueza muscular e cãibras musculares
"Então se forma a história bonita": relações entre folhetos de cordel e literatura erudita
The Involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in Cytokine and Nitric Oxide Production in Visceral Leishmaniasis Patients before and after Treatment with Anti-Leishmanial Drugs - Table 1
<p>* <i>Glucantime (M-metyl-glucamine)scheme</i>: <i>20 mg/Kg/day for 20 days</i></p><p>** <i>Deoxycholate Amphotericin B scheme</i>: <i>1 mg/Kg/day for 20 days</i></p><p>*** <i>Liposomal Amphotericin B scheme</i>: <i>5 mg/Kg/day for 5 days</i></p><p>The Involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in Cytokine and Nitric Oxide Production in Visceral Leishmaniasis Patients before and after Treatment with Anti-Leishmanial Drugs - Table 1 </p