56 research outputs found
On the reliability of merger-trees and the mass growth histories of dark matter haloes
We have used merger trees realizations to study the formation of dark matter
haloes. The construction of merger-trees is based on three different pictures
about the formation of structures in the Universe. These pictures include: the
spherical collapse (SC), the ellipsoidal collapse (EC) and the non-radial
collapse (NR). The reliability of merger-trees has been examined comparing
their predictions related to the distribution of the number of progenitors, as
well as the distribution of formation times, with the predictions of analytical
relations. The comparison yields a very satisfactory agreement. Subsequently,
>.........Comment: A&SS Accepte
Measurement of the Charged Multiplicities in b, c and Light Quark Events from Z0 Decays
Average charged multiplicities have been measured separately in , and
light quark () events from decays measured in the SLD experiment.
Impact parameters of charged tracks were used to select enriched samples of
and light quark events, and reconstructed charmed mesons were used to select
quark events. We measured the charged multiplicities:
,
, from
which we derived the differences between the total average charged
multiplicities of or quark events and light quark events: and . We compared
these measurements with those at lower center-of-mass energies and with
perturbative QCD predictions. These combined results are in agreement with the
QCD expectations and disfavor the hypothesis of flavor-independent
fragmentation.Comment: 19 pages LaTex, 4 EPS figures, to appear in Physics Letters
On the spin distributions of CDM haloes
We used merger trees realizations, predicted by the extended Press-Schechter
theory, in order to study the growth of angular momentum of dark matter haloes.
Our results showed that: 1) The spin parameter resulting from the
above method, is an increasing function of the present day mass of the halo.
The mean value of varies from 0.0343 to 0.0484 for haloes with
present day masses in the range of to
. 2)The distribution of is close to
a log-normal, but, as it is already found in the results of N-body simulations,
the match is not satisfactory at the tails of the distribution. A new
analytical formula that approximates the results much more satisfactorily is
presented. 3) The distribution of the values of depends only weakly
on the redshift. 4) The spin parameter of an halo depends on the number of
recent major mergers. Specifically the spin parameter is an increasing function
of this number.Comment: 10 pages, 8 figure
Timing of Radiotherapy (RT) after Radical Prostatectomy (RP): Long-term outcomes in the RADICALS-RT trial [NCT00541047]
Background
The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been uncertain. RADICALS-RT compared efficacy and safety of adjuvant RT versus an observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure.
Methods
RADICALS-RT was a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with ≥1 risk factor (pT3/4, Gleason 7-10, positive margins, pre-op PSA≥10ng/ml) for recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to adjuvant RT (“Adjuvant-RT”) or an observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure (“Salvage-RT”) defined as PSA≥0.1ng/ml or 3 consecutive rises. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned RT schedule (52.5Gy/20 fractions or 66Gy/33 fractions) and treatment centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom-from-distant metastasis, designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with Salvage-RT (control) to 95% at 10yr with Adjuvant-RT. Secondary outcome measures were bPFS, freedom-from-non-protocol hormone therapy, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used; HR<1 favours Adjuvant-RT.
Findings
Between Oct-2007 and Dec-2016, 1396 participants from UK, Denmark, Canada and Ireland were randomised: 699 Salvage-RT, 697 Adjuvant-RT. Allocated groups were balanced with median age 65yr. 93% (649/697) Adjuvant-RT reported RT within 6m after randomisation; 39% (270/699) Salvage-RT reported RT during follow-up. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. With 80 distant metastasis events, 10yr FFDM was 93% for Adjuvant-RT and 90% for Salvage-RT: HR=0.68 (95%CI 0·43–1·07, p=0·095). Of 109 deaths, 17 were due to prostate cancer. Overall survival was not improved (HR=0.980, 95%CI 0.667–1.440, p=0.917). Adjuvant-RT reported worse urinary and faecal incontinence one year after randomisation (p=0.001); faecal incontinence remained significant after ten years (p=0.017).
Interpretation
Long-term results from RADICALS-RT confirm adjuvant RT after radical prostatectomy increases the risk of urinary and bowel morbidity, but does not meaningfully improve disease control. An observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy
- …