The use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sulfonylureas and the risk of lower limb amputations:a nation-wide cohort study

Background: Numerous studies have investigated the potential association of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) with an increased risk of lower limb amputations (LLAs), but have produced conflicting results. Particularly studies comparing SGLT2-Is to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) seem to find a higher LLA risk with SGLT2-I use. This raises the question whether the results are driven by a protective GLP1-RA-effect rather than a harmful SGLT2-I-effect. GLP1-RAs could promote wound healing and therefore reduce the risk of LLAs, but the associations between both drug classes and LLA remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the risk of LLA and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) with SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus sulfonylurea use. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Danish National Health Service (2013–2018). The study population (N = 74,475) consisted of type 2 diabetes patients aged 18 + who received a first ever prescription of an SGLT2-I, GLP1-RA or sulfonylurea. The date of the first prescription defined the start of follow-up. Time-varying Cox proportional hazards models estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) of LLA and DFU with current SGLT2-I use and GLP1-RA use versus current SU use. The models were adjusted for age, sex, socio-economic variables, comorbidities and concomitant drug use. Results: Current SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA versus sulfonylureas {adjusted HR 1.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–1.70]}. Current GLP1-RA use, on the other hand, was associated with a lower risk of LLA [adjusted HR 0.57 (95%CI 0.39–0.84)] compared to sulfonylureas. The risk of DFU was similar to that with sulfonylureas with both exposures of interest. Conclusion: SGLT2-I use was not associated with a higher risk of LLA, but GLP1-RAs with a lower risk of LLA. Previous studies reporting a higher risk of LLA with SGLT2-I use compared to GLP1-RA use might have been looking at a protective GLP1-RA effect, rather than a harmful SGLT2-I effect

Kidney and vascular function in adult patients with hereditary fructose intolerance

Objective: Previous studies have shown that patients with hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI) are characterized by a greater intrahepatic triglyceride content, despite a fructose-restricted diet. The present study aimed to examine the long-term consequences of HFI on other aldolase-B-expressing organs, i.e. the kidney and vascular endothelium. Methods: Fifteen adult HFI patients were compared to healthy control individuals matched for age, sex and body mass index. Aortic stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and endothelial function by peripheral arterial tonometry, skin laser doppler flowmetry and the endothelial function biomarkers soluble E-selectin [sE-selectin] and von Willebrand factor. Serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Urinary glucose and amino acid excretion and the ratio of tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate to GFR (TmP/GFR) were determined as measures of proximal tubular function. Results: Median systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in HFI patients (127 versus 122 mmHg, p = .045). Pulse pressure and cf-PWV did not differ between the groups (p = .37 and p = .49, respectively). Of all endothelial function markers, only sE-selectin was significantly higher in HFI patients (p = .004). eGFR was significantly higher in HFI patients than healthy controls (119 versus 104 ml/min/1.73m2, p = .001, respectively). All measurements of proximal tubular function did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Adult HFI patients treated with a fructose-restricted diet are characterized by a higher sE-selectin level and slightly higher systolic blood pressure, which in time could contribute to a greater cardiovascular risk. The exact cause and, hence, clinical consequences of the higher eGFR in HFI patients, deserves further study.</p

Reduced corneal nerve fibre length in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: The Maastricht Study

n/

Renal Effects of Aliskiren Compared With and in Combination With Irbesartan in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, and Albuminuria

Objective: We investigated if the antiproteinuric effect of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren is comparable to irbesartan, and the effect of the combination. Research Design and Methods: Double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial. After a one-month washout period 26 patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and albuminuria (>100mg/day) were randomized to four 2-month treatment periods in random order with placebo, aliskiren 300 mg once daily, irbesartan 300 mg once daily or the combination using identical doses. Patients received furosemide in a stable dose throughout the study. Primary endpoint was change in albuminuria. Secondary measures included change in 24h blood pressure (24h BP) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: Placebo geometric mean albuminuria was 258 mg/day (range 84-2361), mean 24h BP was 140/73 (SD 15/8) mmHg, GFR was 89 (SD 27) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Aliskiren treatment reduced albuminuria by 48% (95% confidence interval 27-62) compared to placebo (p<0.001), not significantly different from irbesartan treatment (58% (42-70) (p<0.001 vs. placebo)). Combination treatment reduced albuminuria by 71% (59-79), more than either monotherapy (p<0.001 and p=0.028). Fractional clearances of albumin were significantly reduced (46, 56 and 67% reduction vs. placebo). 24h BP was reduced 3/4 mmHg by aliskiren (NS/p=0.009), 12/5 mmHg by irbesartan (p<0.001/p=0.002) and 10/6 mmHg by the combination (p=0.001/p<0.001). GFR was significantly reduced 4.6 (0.3, 8.8) ml/min/1.73m(2) by aliskiren, 8.0 (3.6, 12.3) ml/min/1.73m(2) by irbesartan and 11.7 (7.4, 15.9) ml/min/1.73m(2) by the combination. Conclusions: Combining aliskiren and irbesartan is more antiproteinuric in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria as compared to monotherapy

Microvascular complications at time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes are similar among diabetic patients detected by targeted screening and patients newly diagnosed in general practice - The Hoorn Screening Study

OBJECTIVE - To investigate whether screening-detected diabetic patients differ from diabetic patients newly diagnosed in general practice with regard to the presence of microvascular complications. RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS - Diabetic patients, identified by a population-based targeted screening procedure consisting of a screening questionnaire and a fasting capillary whole-blood glucose measurement followed by diagnostic testing, were compared with patients newly diagnosed with diabetes in general practice. Retinopathy was assessed with fundus photography, impaired foot sensitivity was assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, and the presence of microalbuminuria was measured by means of the albumin-to creatinine ratio (ACR). RESULTS - A total of 195 screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 60 patients newly diagnosed in general practice participated in the medical examination. The prevalence of retinopathy was higher in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients than in patients newly diagnosed in general practice, but not significantly higher. The prevalence of retinopathy was 7.6% (95% CI 4.6-12.4) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 1.9% (0.3-9.8) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The prevalence of impaired foot sensitivity was similar in both groups, 48.1% (40.9-55.3) and 48.3% (36.2-60.7), respectively. The ACR was 0.61 (interquariile range 0.41-1.50) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and 0.99 (0.53-2.49) in patients newly diagnosed in general practice. The difference in prevalence of microalbuminuria was not statistically significant. The prevalence of microalbuminuria was 17.2% (95% CI 12.5-23.2) and 26.7% (17.1-39.0) in screening-detected type 2 diabetic patients and patients newly diagnosed in general practice, respectively. CONCLUSIONS - Targeted screening for type 2 diabetes (with a screening questionnaire as a first step) resulted in the identification of previously undiagnosed diabetic patients with a considerable prevalence of microvascular complications

Microalbuminuria and Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Are Independently Associated With Cardiovascular Mortality: Evidence for Distinct Pathways: The Hoorn Study

) or microalbuminuria (1.76 [1.05-2.94]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both microalbuminuria and C-AD are independently associated with cardiovascular mortality, and the excess mortality attributable to microalbuminuria cannot be explained by C-A

Combination of insulin and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

WSTĘP. Celem pracy była ocena działania metabolicznego metforminy w porównaniu z placebo, u chorych na cukrzycę typu 2, leczonych według schematu intensywnej insulinoterapii. MATERIAŁ I METODY. Metformina poprawia kontrolę glikemii u osób ze źle wyrównaną cukrzycą typu 2. Dotychczas nie zbadano jej wpływu u chorych na cukrzycę typu 2, leczonych metodą intensywnej insulinoterapii. Grupa 390 chorych na cukrzycę typu 2, stosujących insulinę, uczestniczyła w randomizowanym, kontrolowanym, przeprowadzonym metodą podwójnie ślepej próby badaniu z zaplanowaną pośrednią analizą po 16 tygodniach leczenia. Uczestników badania wybrano z 3 przyszpitalnych przychodni i losowo przydzielono do grup, przyjmujących placebo lub metforminę w uzupełnieniu insulinoterapii. Podczas badania prowadzono intensywną kontrolę glikemii z natychmiastowym dostosowaniem dawki insuliny, zgodnie ze ścisłymi wytycznymi. Określano wskaźniki kontroli glikemii, zapotrzebowanie na insulinę, masę ciała, ciśnienie tętnicze, stężenie lipidów, incydenty hipoglikemii i inne działania niepożądane. WYNIKI. Sposród 390 osób 37 nie ukończyło badania (12 w grupie otrzymującej placebo i 25 w grupie leczonej metforminą). U osób, które ukończyły 16-tygodniowy okres leczenia zastosowanie metforminy w porównaniu z placebo powodowało poprawę kontroli glikemii (średnia glikemia podczas 16 tygodni 7,8 vs. 8,8 mmol/l, p = 0,006; średnie stężenie HbA1c 6,9 vs. 7,6%, p < 0,0001), zmniejszone zapotrzebowanie na insulinę (63,8 vs. 71,3 j.; p < 0,0001), mniejszy przyrost masy ciała (-0,4 vs. +1,2 kg; p < 0,01) i zmniejszenie stężenia cholesterolu frakcji LDL (-0,21 vs. -0,02 mmol/l; p < 0,01). Ryzyko wystąpienia hipoglikemii było podobne. WNIOSKI. U chorych na cukrzycę typu 2, leczonych intensywnie insuliną, skojarzenie insuliny z metforminą powoduje lepsze wyrównanie glikemii w porównaniu z monoterapią insuliną, a jednocześnie zmniejsza zapotrzebowanie na insulinę i ogranicza przyrost masy ciała.INTRODUCTION. To investigate the metabolic effects of metformin, as compared with placebo, in type 2 diabetic patients intensively treated with insulin. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Metformin improves glycemic control in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Its effect in type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin has not been studied. A total of 390 patients whose type 2 diabetes was controlled with insulin therapy completed a randomized controlled double-blind trial with a planned interim analysis after 16 weeks of treatment.The subjects were selected from three outpatient clinics in regional hospitals and were randomly assigned to either the placebo or metformin group, in addition to insulin therapy. Intensive glucose monitoring with immediate insulin adjustments according to strict guidelines was conducted. Indexes of glycemic control, insulin requirements, body weight, blood pressure, plasma lipids, hypoglycemic events, and other adverse events were measured. RESULTS. Of the 390 subjects, 37 dropped out (12 in the placebo and 25 in the metformin group). Of those who completed 16 weeks of treatment, metformin use, as compared with placebo, was associated with improved glycemic control (mean daily glucose at 16 weeks 7.8 vs. 8.8 mmol/l, P = 0.006; mean GHb 6.9 vs. 7.6%, P < 0.0001); reduced insulin requirements (63.8 vs. 71.3 IU, P < 0.0001); reduced weight gain (&#8211;0.4 vs. +1.2 kg, P < 0.01); and decreased plasma LDL cholesterol (&#8211;0.21 vs. &#8211;0.02 mmol/l, P < 0.01). Risk of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS. In type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin, the combination of insulin and metformin results in superior glycemic control compared with insulin therapy alone, while insulin requirements and weight gain are less

Blood pressure, lipids, and obesity are associated with reteinopathy - The Hoorn study

OBJECTIVE - To study potential risk factors for retinopathy in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The Hoorn Study is a population-based study including 2,484 50- to 74-year-old Caucasians. A subsample of 626 individuals stratified by age, sex, and glucose tolerance underwent extensive measurements during 1989-1992, including ophthalmologic examination and two-field 45-degree fundus photography. The prevalence of (diabetic) retinopathy was assessed among individuals with normal glucose metabolism (NGM) and impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) and individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (NDM) and known diabetes mellitus (KDM) (new World Health Organization 1999 criteria). RESULTS - The prevalence of retinopathy was 9% in NGM, 11% in IGM, 13% in NDM, and 34% in KDM. Retinopathy worse than minimal nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy was present in 8% in KDM and 0-2% in other glucose categories. The prevalence of retinopathy was positively associated with elevated blood pressure, BMI, cholesterol, and triglyceride serum levels in all glucose categories. The age-, sex-, and glucose metabolism category-adjusted odds ratios were 1.5 (95% CI 1.2-1.9), 1.3 (1.0-1.7), and 1.3 (1.0-1.6) per SD increase of systolic blood pressure, BMI, and total cholesterol concentration, respectively, and 1.2 (1.0-1.5) per 50% increase of triglyceride level. Elevated blood pressure and plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels showed associations with retinal hard exudates. CONCLUSIONS - Retinopathy is a multifactorial microvascular complication, which, apart from hyperglycemia, is associated with blood pressure, lipid concentrations, and BMI