2,231 research outputs found

    A cross sectional study of ‘care left undone’ on nursing shifts in hospitals

    No full text
    Aims: To determine factors associated with variation in ‘care left undone’ (also referred to as “missed care”) by registered nurses in acute hospital wards in Sweden. Background: ‘Care left undone’ has been examined as a factor mediating the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. The context has not previously been explored to determine what other factors are associated with variation in ‘care left undone’ by registered nurses. Design: Cross-sectional survey to explore the association of registered nurse staffing and contextual factors such as time of shift, nursing role and patient acuity / dependency on ‘care left undone’ was examined using multi-level logistic regression. Methods: A survey of 10,174 registered nurse working on general medical and surgical wards in 79 acute care hospitals in Sweden (Jan-March 2010). Results: 74% of nurses reported some care was left undone on their last shift. The time of shift, patient mix, nurses’ role, practice environment, and staffing have a significant relationship with care left undone. The odds of care being left undone is halved on shifts where registered nurse care for 6 patients or fewer compared with shifts where they care for 10 or more. Conclusion: The previously observed relationship between registered nurse staffing and care left undone is confirmed. Reports of care left undone is influenced by registered nurse roles. Support worker staffing has little effect. Research is needed to identify how these factors relate to one another and whether care left undone is a predictor of adverse patient outcomes. <br/

    Patients' initial steps to cancer diagnosis in Denmark, England and Sweden: what can a qualitative, cross-country comparison of narrative interviews tell us about potentially modifiable factors?

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: To illuminate patterns observed in International Cancer Benchmarking Programme studies by extending understanding of the various influences on presentation and referral with cancer symptoms. DESIGN: Cross-country comparison of Denmark, England and Sweden with qualitative analysis of in-depth interview accounts of the prediagnostic process in lung or bowel cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 155 women and men, aged between 35 and 86 years old, diagnosed with lung or bowel cancer in 6 months before interview. SETTING: Participants recruited through primary and secondary care, social media and word of mouth. Interviews collected by social scientists or nurse researchers during 2015, mainly in participants' homes. RESULTS: Participants reported difficulties in interpreting diffuse bodily sensations and symptoms and deciding when to consult. There were examples of swift referrals by primary care professionals in all three countries. In all countries, participants described difficulty deciding if and when to consult, highlighting concerns about access to general practitioner appointments and overstretched primary care services, although this appears less prominent in the Swedish data. It was not unusual for there to be more than one consultation before referral and we noted two distinct patterns of repeated consultation: (1) situations where the participant left the primary care consultation with a plan of action about what should happen next; (2) participants were unclear about under which conditions to return to the doctors. This second pattern sometimes extended over many weeks during which patients described uncertainty, and sometimes frustration, about if and when they should return and whether there were any other feasible investigations. The latter pattern appeared more evident in the interviews in England and Denmark than Sweden. CONCLUSION: We suggest that if clear action plans, as part of safety netting, were routinely used in primary care consultations then uncertainty, false reassurance and the inefficiency and distress of multiple consultations could be reduced
    corecore