Numbering of Fullerenes (IUPAC Recommendations 2004)

Rules for numbering (C60-Ih)[5,6]fullerene and (C70-D5h(6))[5,6]fullerene were codified in a publication "Nomenclature for the (C60-Ih)[5,6] and (C70-D5h(6))[5,6]fullerenes” published in Pure Appl. Chem.74 (4), 629-695 (2002). The current publication contains recommendations for numbering a wide variety of fullerenes of different sizes, with rings of different sizes, from C20 to C120, and of various point group symmetries, including low symmetries such as Cs, Ci, and C1, as well as many fullerenes that have been isolated and well characterized as pristine carbon allotropes or as derivatives. These recommendations are based on the principles established in the earlier publication and aim at the identification of a well-defined and preferably contiguous helical pathway for numbering. Rules for systematically completing the numbering of fullerene structures for which a contiguous numbering pathway becomes discontiguous are presente

Nomenclature for the C60-Ih and C70-D5h(6) fullerenes (IUPAC Recommendations 2002)

Fullerenes are a new allotrope of carbon characterized by a closed-cage structure consisting of an even number of three-coordinate carbon atoms devoid of hydrogen atoms. This class was originally limited to closed-cage structures with 12 isolated five-membered rings, the rest being six-membered rings. Although it was recognized that existing organic ring nomenclature could be used for these structures, the resulting names would be extremely unwieldy and inconvenient for use. At the same time it was also recognized that established organic nomenclature principles could be used, or adapted, to provide a consistent nomenclature for this unique class of compounds based on the class name fullerene. However, it was necessary to develop an entirely new method for uniquely numbering closed-cage systems. This paper describes IUPAC recommendations for naming and uniquely numbering the two most common fullerenes with isolated pentagons, the icosahedral C60 fullerene and a D5h-C70 fullerene. It also describes recommendations for adapting organic nomenclature principles for naming fullerenes with nonclosed-cage structures, heterofullerenes, derivatives formed by substitution of hydrofullerenes, and the fusion of organic rings or ring systems to the fullerene cage. Finally, this paper suggests methods for describing structures consisting of two or more fullerene units and for denoting configurations of chiral fullerenes and their derivative

Numbering of fullerenes

Rules for numbering (C-60-I-h)[5,6]fullerene and (C-70-D-5h(6))[5,6]fullerene were codified in a publication "Nomenclature for the (C-60-I-h)[5,6] and (C-70-D-5h(6))[5,6]fullerenes" published in Pure Appl. Chem. 74 (4), 629-695 (2002). The current publication contains recommendations for numbering a wide variety of fullerenes of different sizes, with rings of different sizes, from C-20 to C-120, and of various point group symmetries, including low symmetries such as C-s, C-i, and C-1, as well as many fullerenes that have been isolated and well characterized as pristine carbon allotropes or as derivatives. These recommendations are based on the principles established in the earlier publication and aim at the identification of a well-defined and preferably contiguous helical pathway for numbering. Rules for systematically completing the numbering of fullerene structures for which a contiguous numbering pathway becomes discontiguous are presented

Achiral and Chiral Higher Adducts of C₇₀ by Bingel Cyclopropanation

Five optically active isomeric C70 bis-adducts with (R)-configured chiral malonate addends were prepared by Bingel cyclopropanation (Scheme 1) and their circular dichroism (CD) spectra investigated in comparison to those of the corresponding five bis-adducts with (S)-configured addends (Fig. 2). Pairs of diastereoisomers, in which the inherently chiral addition patterns on the fullerene surface have an enantiomeric relationship, display mirror-image shaped CD spectra that are nearly identical to those of the corresponding pairs of enantiomers (Fig. 3, b and c). This result demonstrates that the Cotton effects arising from the chiral malonate addends are negligible as compared to the chiroptical contribution of the chirally functionalized fullerene chromophore. A series of four stereoisomeric tetrakis-adducts (Fig. 4) was prepared by Bingel cyclopropanation starting from four stereoisomeric bis-adducts. A comparison of the CD spectra of both series of compounds showed that the magnitude of the Cotton effects does not decrease with increasing degree of functionalization (Fig. 5). Bingel cyclopropanations of C70 in Me2SO are dramatically faster than in apolar solvents such as CCl4, and the reaction of bis-adducts (±)-13 and 15 with large excesses of diethyl 2-bromomalonate and DBU generated, via the intermediacy of defined tetrakis-adducts (±)-16 and 17, respectively, a series of higher adducts including hexakis-, heptakis-, and octakis-adducts (Table 1). A high regioselectivity was observed up to the stage of the hexakis-adducts, whereas this selectivity became much reduced at higher stages of addition. The regioselectivity of the nucleophilic cyclopropanations of C70 correlates with the coefficients of the LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) and LUMO+1 at the positions of preferential attack calculated by restricted Hartree-Fock – self-consistent field (RHF-SCF) methods (Figs. 9 – 11). Based on predictions from molecular-orbital calculations (Fig. 11) and the analysis of experimental 13C-NMR data (Fig. 7, a), the structure of a unique hexakis-adduct ((±)-22, Fig. 12), prepared from (±)-13, was assigned. The C2-symmetrical compound contains four 6−6-closed methanofullerene sub-structures in its polar regions (at the bonds C(1)−C(2), C(31)−C(32), C(54)−C(55), and C(59)−C(60)), and two 6−5-open methanofullerene sub-structures parallel to the equator (at C(22)−C(23) and C(26)−C(27)). The 6−5-open sub-structures are formed by malonate additions to near-equatorial 6−5 bonds with enhanced LUMO coefficients, followed by valence isomerization (Fig. 12)