Outcomes of bipolar radial head prosthesis to treat complex radial head fractures in 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months

AbstractBackgroundRadial head replacement is indicated to treat complex proximal radial fractures that are not amenable to internal fixation.HypothesisImplantation of a bipolar radial head prosthesis after radial head excision ensures stability of the elbow and forearm, thereby promoting ligament healing and restoring elbow function.Material and methodsTwenty-two patients managed with implantation of a bipolar radial head prosthesis (Guepar®) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 50 months. The procedure was performed in the acute setting in 16 patients, including 13 with associated injuries; and at the stage of sequelae in 6 patients.ResultsProsthesis removal was required in 4 patients. Of the remaining 18 patients, 14 (77%) had satisfactory Mayo Elbow Performance Score values, 14 (77%) little or no functional impairment, and 11 (61%) little or no pain. Mean motion arcs were 100° in flexion-extension and 143° in pronation-supination. Mean elbow strength in flexion and mean wrist strength were 67% and 86%, respectively, of those on the contralateral normal side. Radio-lucent lines were visible around the prosthesis in 5 patients, radial neck osteolysis in 10 patients, and capitellar erosion in 7 patients. Seven patients each experienced a complication. Early revision surgery to treat elbow instability was required in 6 patients.DiscussionOutcomes after Guepar® bipolar radial head prosthesis implantation were disappointing in patients with complex radial head fractures seen in the acute or chronic setting. The associated injuries to bones and ligaments and the measures taken to repair them influence the prognosis. The complication rate is non-negligible and seems to increase over time.Level of evidenceIV, retrospective study

Treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocation by open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Untreated chronic shoulder dislocation eventually leads to functional disability and pain. Open reduction with different fixation methods have been introduced for most chronic shoulder dislocation. We hypothesized that open reduction and simultaneous Bankart lesion repair in chronic anterior shoulder dislocation obviates the need for joint fixation and leads to better results than previously reported methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Eight patients with chronic anterior dislocation of shoulder underwent open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair after an average delay of 10 weeks from injury. Early motion was allowed the day after surgery in the safe position and the clinical and radiographic results were analyzed at an average follow-up of one year.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The average Rowe and Zarin's score was 86 points. Four out of eight shoulders were graded as excellent, three as good and one as fair (Rowe and Zarins system). All patients were able to perform their daily activities and they had either mild or no pain. Anterior active forward flexion loss averaged 18 degrees, external active rotation loss averaged 17.5 degrees and internal active rotation loss averaged 3 vertebral body levels. Mild degenerative joint changes were noted in one patient.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results show that the overall prognosis for this method of operation is more favorable than the previously reported methods and we recommend concomitant open reduction and capsulolabral complex repair for the treatment of old anterior shoulder dislocation.</p> <p>Level of Evidence</p> <p>Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group])</p

TNFα stimulates NKG2D-mediated lytic activity of acute myeloid leukemic cells

International audienc

Daunorubicin-induced internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in acute myeloid cell lines.

International audienceThe study was designed to evaluate the implication of apoptosis in myeloid leukemic cell death induced by daunorubicin (DNR) and to identify the possible factors which may influence this process. DNR-induced apoptosis was characterized by morphology and DNA fragmentation in six leukemic myeloid cell lines which expressed different differentiation phenotypes. In phenotypically mature HL-60 and U937 cells, DNR induced typical apoptosis with characteristic morphological changes and intense internucleosomal DNA fragmentation within a narrow concentration range (0.5-2 microM). When these cells were treated with higher doses of DNR, large DNA fragments (100 kbp), but not internucleosomal fragments, were identified. DNR-induced DNA fragmentation in HL-60 and U937 was inhibited by antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine (N-ac) or pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate (PDTC). In the phenotypically immature KG1a, KG1, HEL and ML1 cell lines DNR induced no characteristic apoptotic morphological features as well as very low levels of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, whereas large DNA fragments (200 kbp) were observed in KG1a treated with 7 microM DNR. Since the latter expressed P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the role of P-gp in the lack of apoptotic response to DNR was investigated. One P-gp inhibitor (verapamil) slightly improved DNR-induced DNA fragmentation in KG1a cells whereas the combination of verapamil and buthionine-sulfoximine (BSO), which depletes glutathion store, further increased internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. In conclusion, DNR induced internucleosomal DNA fragmentation in some but not all AML cells; the magnitude of this process being influenced by both intracellular drug concentration and oxidative balance

Omarthrose ecentrée : symposium

Cuff tear arthropathy is defined as the combination of a gleno-humeral arthritis and a massive rotators cuff tear. It is generally admitted that the cuff tear, or its deficiency jeopardises the results of anatomic prosthesis. Grammont imagined and grew the concept of the reverse prosthesis whose aim was to remedy the insufficiency of the rotator cuff and whose use has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach in these complicated situations. The aim of this symposium is to analyse the results of shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic prosthesis, bipolar or reverse) in cuff tear arthropathy, in massive and isolated cuff tears which justify the use of prosthetic surgery, and in centered osteoarthritis with deficient cuff also justifying this use. Massive cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy have been considered as the stages of a same pathology by Hamada whose classification has been used for the purposes of this study. Out of the 738 initial prosthesis, 111 have been eliminated because of death, incomplete files or lost of sight, without any known complication. Out of the remaining 627 who were used as a basis for this symposium (representing 85% of initial cases), 570 who still had their prosthesis were reviewed and their functional results analysed after 2 years or more. The population was mainly female (72%) who were injured on the dominant side (75%) with a mean age of 72 years. The preoperative Constant score was in average 24 and 24% of the patients had already been operated on their shoulder. For those who had an acetabulization of the acromion, the strength in external rotation was significantly less satisfying and the lesion of the infraspinatus and the teres minor were more frequent. 48 hemiarthroplasties, 52 bipolar and 527 reverse prosthesis were studied. At revision, with an average follow up of 52 months, the revision rate was 23% for hemiarthroplasties, 14% for reversed prosthesis and only 8% for bipolar prosthesis. The prosthesis was removed in 21% of hemiarthroplasties, 5% of reverse and 2% of bipolar. No infection to report in the hemi group or the bipolar group, whereas there was an infection rate of 5% in the reverse group. Nevertheless, the Constant score was significantly better with reverse (62) than with bipolar (45) or hemi (44). The active elevation was also better with the reverse whereas the external rotation was not as good as with anatomic prosthesis. The analytic study of the results of the reverse prosthesis shows a negative influence of the lesion of the sub-scapularis and the teres minor. The results are disappointing with young patients and those who had surgical precedents. On X-ray, we can notice 0.5% of humeral loosening withouth any correlation to the fact that the implant is cemented or not, 3.6% of glenoid loosening and 68% of scapular notches without any significant change on the Constant score. Their occurrence is correlated to a preoperative rising of the humeral head and a superior glenoid lesion. It is observed more frequently with the supero-lateral approach compared to the delto-pectoral one. The frequency of these notches grows with the follow up and their occurrence is often associated to humeral radiolucent lines. On the long term, the survival rate of these prosthesis is 89% at 10 years. The Constant score deteriorates gradually after 7 years; this seems to be linked to the occurrence of x-ray modifications in the years that followed. The main complications observed with reverse prosthesis were the infections (5.1%), the glenoid problems (5.1%), the instabilities (3.6%), the acromion fractures (3.0%). Infections can be treated by a wash out and antibiotics in the first 3 months, then the removal of the prosthesis becomes necessary. The instabilities occur more often for males, with delto-pectoral approach and with 36mm diameter glenoids. The glenoid problems are frequent in the first years and often due to technical errors or material defects (unscrewing of the glenosphere). Acromion fractures have an important clinical impact when they concern the spine and there healing is difficult to obtain, whichever method is used. In conclusion, the use of a prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathies must be thought about, especially in massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis, in patients with previous surgery, and in patients younger than 70. If the active elevation is conserved and the patient is young, the use of an hemi or a bipolar prosthesis can be debated. In other cases, the indication of a reverse prosthesis is preferable given that the clinical results are better. In these cases, the surgical technique must be accurate, bearing in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the two possible approaches, the type of implant (36 vs 42), the position and orientation of the glenoid baseplate according to the pre-operative bone wear, the orientation of the humeral implant, the need for reinsertion of the subscapularis and, maybe, the possibility of an associated transfer of the latissimus dorsi