Impact of High Concentrations of Saharan Dust Aerosols on Infrared-Based Land Surface Temperature Products

An analysis of three operational satellite-based thermal-infrared land surface temperature (LST) products is presented for conditions of heavy dust aerosol loading. The LST products are compared against ERA5’s skin temperature (SKT) across the Sahara Desert and Sahel region, where high concentrations of dust aerosols are prevalent. Large anomalous differences are found between satellite LST and ERA5’s SKT during the periods of highest dust activity, and satellite–ERA5 differences are shown to be strongly related to dust aerosol optical depth (DuAOD) at 550 nm, indicating an underestimation of LST in conditions of heavy dust aerosol loading. In situ measurements from two ground stations in the Sahel region provide additional evidence of this underestimation, showing increased biases of satellite LST with DuAOD, and no significant dependence of ERA5’s SKT biases on dust aerosol concentrations. The impact of atmospheric water vapor content on LST and SKT is also examined, but dust aerosols are shown to be the primary driver of the inaccurate LSTs observed. Based on comparisons with in situ data, we estimate an aerosol-induced underestimation of LST of approximately 0.9 K for every 0.1 increase in DuAOD. Analysis of brightness temperatures (BTs) in the thermal infrared atmospheric window reveals that dust aerosols have the opposite effect on BT differences compared to water vapor, leading to an underestimation of atmospheric correction by the LST retrieval algorithms. This article highlights a shortcoming of current operational LST retrieval algorithms that must be addressed

Assessment of the Paris urban heat island in ERA5 and offline SURFEX-TEB (v8.1) simulations using the METEOSAT land surface temperature product

Cities concentrate people, wealth, emissions, and infrastructure, thus representing a challenge and an opportunity for climate change mitigation and adaptation. This urgently demands for accurate urban climate projections to help organizations and individuals to make climate-smart decisions. However, most of the large ensembles of global and regional climate model simulations do not include sophisticated urban parameterizations (e.g., EURO-CORDEX; CMIP5/6). Here, we explore this shortcoming in ERA5 (the latest generation reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) and in a simulation with the SURFEX (Surface Externalisée) land surface model employing the widely used bulk bare rock approach. The city of Paris is considered as a case study. Subsequently, we apply a more complex urban scheme – SURFEX coupled to the Town Energy Balance (TEB) urban canopy model to assess its benefits on characterizing the Paris urban climate. Both simulations and ERA5 were compared to the LSA SAF (Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis) land surface temperature product to evaluate the simulation of Parisian surface urban heat island (SUHI). Our results show a significant added value of SURFEX-TEB in reproducing the SUHI during the daytime and the UHI during both the daytime and nighttime (with overall reductions in the bias and root mean square error and improvements in the representation of the statistics of the SUHI/UHI displayed by the Perkins skill score or S score). The improvement in the simulated SUHI is lower during the nighttime due to the lack of land–atmosphere feedbacks in the proposed offline framework. Nonetheless, the offline SURFEX-TEB framework applied here clearly demonstrates the added value of using more comprehensive parameterization schemes to simulate the urban climate and, therefore, allowing the improvement of urban climate projections.</p

Technical note: A view from space on global flux towers by MODIS and Landsat: The FluxnetEO dataset

Funding Information: Acknowledgements. We thank the team at the ICOS Carbon Portal for their support in publishing the FluxnetEO data sets, with great thanks in particular to Ute Karstens and Zois Zogopoulos. SW acknowledges funding from an ESA Living Planet Fellowship in the project Vad3e mecum. Alexey Vasilevich Panov acknowledges funding from the Max Planck Society (Germany), Russian Foundation for Basic Re- search, Krasnoyarsk Territory and Krasnoyarsk Regional Fund of Science, project no. 20-45-242908. Frederik Schrader and Christian Brümmer acknowledge funds from the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) received through Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture. Simon Besnard acknowledges funding from the European Union through the BIOMAS-CAT (project code: 4000115192/18/I/NB) (https://eo4society.esa. int/projects/biomascat/, last access: 3 May 2022) and VERIFY (project code: BO-55-101-006) (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/ 776810, last access: 3 May 2022) projects. Funding Information: Financial support. This research has been supported by the Euro- Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Sophia Walther et al.The eddy-covariance technique measures carbon, water, and energy fluxes between the land surface and the atmosphere at hundreds of sites globally. Collections of standardised and homogenised flux estimates such as the LaThuile, Fluxnet2015, National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS), AsiaFlux, AmeriFlux, and Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN)/OzFlux data sets are invaluable to study land surface processes and vegetation functioning at the ecosystem scale. Space-borne measurements give complementary information on the state of the land surface in the surroundings of the towers. They aid the interpretation of the fluxes and support the benchmarking of terrestrial biosphere models. However, insufficient quality and frequent and/or long gaps are recurrent problems in applying the remotely sensed data and may considerably affect the scientific conclusions. Here, we describe a standardised procedure to extract, quality filter, and gap-fill Earth observation data from the MODIS instruments and the Landsat satellites. The methods consistently process surface reflectance in individual spectral bands, derived vegetation indices, and land surface temperature. A geometrical correction estimates the magnitude of land surface temperature as if seen from nadir or 40g off-nadir. Finally, we offer the community living data sets of pre-processed Earth observation data, where version 1.0 features the MCD43A4/A2 and MxD11A1 MODIS products and Landsat Collection 1 Tier 1 and Tier 2 products in a radius of 2 km around 338 flux sites. The data sets we provide can widely facilitate the integration of activities in the eddy-covariance, remote sensing, and modelling fields.publishersversionpublishe

Inversion of AMSR-E observations for land surface temperature estimation: 1. Methodology and evaluation with station temperature

International audienc

Inversion of AMSR-E observations for land surface temperature estimation: 2. Global comparison with infrared satellite temperature

International audienc

A Methodology to Simulate LST Directional Effects Based on Parametric Models and Landscape Properties

The correction of directional effects on satellite-retrieved land surface temperature (LST) is of high relevance for a proper interpretation of spatial and temporal features contained in LST fields. This study presents a methodology to correct such directional effects in an operational setting. This methodology relies on parametric models, which are computationally efficient and require few input information, making them particularly appropriate for operational use. The models are calibrated with LST data collocated in time and space from MODIS (Aqua and Terra) and SEVIRI (Meteosat), for an area covering the entire SEVIRI disk and encompassing the full year of 2011. Past studies showed that such models are prone to overfitting, especially when there are discrepancies between the LSTs that are not related to the viewing geometry (e.g., emissivity, atmospheric correction). To reduce such effects, pixels with similar characteristics are first grouped by means of a cluster analysis. The models&rsquo; calibration is then performed on each one of the selected clusters. The derived coefficients reflect the expected impact of vegetation and topography on the anisotropy of LST. Furthermore, when tested with independent data, the calibrated models are shown to maintain the capability of representing the angular dependency of the differences between LST derived from polar-orbiter (MODIS) and geostationary (Meteosat, GOES and Himawari) satellites. The methodology presented here is currently being used to estimate the deviation of LST products with respect to what would be obtained for a reference view angle (e.g., nadir), therefore contributing to the harmonization of LST products

Quantifying the Clear-Sky Bias of Satellite Land Surface Temperature Using Microwave-Based Estimates

International audienceMost available long-term databases of land surface temperature (LST)derived from space-borne sensors rely on infrared observations and aretherefore restricted to clear-sky conditions. Hence, studies based onsuch data sets may not be representative of all-weather conditions andmay be considered as "biased" toward clear sky. An assessment of theimpact of this restriction is made using 3 years of LST derived frompassive microwave observations that are not affected by most clouds. Asystematic analysis in space and time is performed of the "clear-skybias," defined as the difference between average clear-sky and averageall-weather LSTs. The amplitude of the bias is closely related to thefraction of clear-sky days, and therefore, arid regions are associatedto very low values of bias whereas midlatitudes present the highestvalues. During daytime, the input of solar radiation for clear-skysituations leads to higher LST values, and therefore, the bias isgenerally positive (e.g., 2-8 K over the midlatitudes) whereas, duringnighttime, the bias is generally negative although with lower amplitude(around -2 K), because of the increased radiative cooling for clear-skysituations. The clear-, cloudy-, and all-sky LSTs are also compared withnear-surface air temperature. Although LST is generally higher than airtemperature, the contrast between the two may be strongly influenced bylocal weather conditions. Both the clear-sky bias and differencesbetween LST and air temperature are also analyzed at the local scaletaking into account the predominant cloud regime