Efficacy, Perception, and Utilization of Pediatric Teledermatology: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The use of teledermatology abruptly expanded with the arrival of COVID-19. Here, we review recent studies regarding the efficacy, perception, and utilization of telemedicine in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current state of pediatric teledermatology. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the terms pediatric, teledermatology, dermatology, telemedicine and telehealth in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. 44 articles published between 2008 and 2022 were included. RESULTS: Diagnostic concordance between pediatric teledermatologist and in-person dermatologist ranged from 70.1% to 89%. Conditions treated with pediatric teledermatology were similar to those treated in-person. The rate of in-person follow-up after an initial telemedicine appointment pre and postpandemic was 12% to 51.9% and 13.5% to 28.1%, respectively. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology was between 70% to 98% and provider satisfaction was approximately 95%. The integration of teledermatology can reduce missed appointments and wait times among pediatric patients. However, considerable technological challenges exist, particularly in underserved communities. Globally, teledermatology may expand access to care though limited literature exists regarding its use in pediatric populations. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine is effective for the diagnosis and treatment of many dermatological conditions in children, with high patient and provider satisfaction. Implementation of teledermatology can potentially increase access to care both locally and globally, but obstacles to engagement remain

Efficacy, perception, and utilization of pediatric teledermatology: A systematic reviewCapsule Summary

Background: The use of teledermatology abruptly expanded with the arrival of COVID-19. Here, we review recent studies regarding the efficacy, perception, and utilization of telemedicine in the pediatric population. Objective: To evaluate the current state of pediatric teledermatology. Methods: A literature search was performed using the terms “pediatric,” “teledermatology,” “dermatology,” “telemedicine” and “telehealth” in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. 44 articles published between 2008 and 2022 were included. Results: Diagnostic concordance between pediatric teledermatologist and in-person dermatologist ranged from 70.1% to 89%. Conditions treated with pediatric teledermatology were similar to those treated in-person. The rate of in-person follow-up after an initial telemedicine appointment pre and postpandemic was 12% to 51.9% and 13.5% to 28.1%, respectively. Patient satisfaction with teledermatology was between 70% to 98% and provider satisfaction was approximately 95%. The integration of teledermatology can reduce missed appointments and wait times among pediatric patients. However, considerable technological challenges exist, particularly in underserved communities. Globally, teledermatology may expand access to care though limited literature exists regarding its use in pediatric populations. Conclusion: Telemedicine is effective for the diagnosis and treatment of many dermatological conditions in children, with high patient and provider satisfaction. Implementation of teledermatology can potentially increase access to care both locally and globally, but obstacles to engagement remain

The Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab for Plaque Psoriasis: An Expert Consensus Panel

Abstract Introduction Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the skin, joints, and several other organ systems with significant disease burden. Bimekizumab is the first monoclonal antibody targeting both interleukin (IL)-17A and interleukin-17F and has demonstrated efficacy for treating moderate to severe psoriasis. Limited guidelines exist for incorporating this drug into clinical practice. The purpose of this study was for a panel of experts in psoriasis management to synthesize current literature and provide consensus statements with guidance on use of bimekizumab. Methods A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was completed for English-language original research articles on the use of bimekizumab for moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A panel of nine dermatologists with significant expertise in treatment of psoriasis gathered to review the articles and create consensus statements on this new medication. A modified Delphi process was used to approve each statement and a strength of recommendation was assigned using Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy criteria. Results The literature search produced 102 articles that met criteria. A thorough screening of the studies for relevance to the research question resulted in 19 articles. These were distributed to all panelists for review prior to a roundtable discussion. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 14 consensus statements and recommendations, 12 of which were given a strength of “A”, one of which was given a strength of “B”, and one of which was given a strength of “C”. Conclusion Bimekizumab results in rapid and long-lasting clinical improvement for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. It has demonstrated superior efficacy when compared to several other biologics. The safety profile is consistent with other biologics, except for an increased incidence of oropharyngeal candidiasis

Advances in Technology for Melanoma Diagnosis and Prognosis: An Expert Consensus Panel

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is associated with a higher mortality rate than most other skin cancers. The purpose of this expert consensus panel was to review the published literature on new technological advancements for the diagnosis and prognosis for CM and provide updated guidance on their usage.BACKGROUNDCutaneous melanoma (CM) is associated with a higher mortality rate than most other skin cancers. The purpose of this expert consensus panel was to review the published literature on new technological advancements for the diagnosis and prognosis for CM and provide updated guidance on their usage.A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was completed for English-language original research articles on the topics of non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic testing for CM, including gene expression profiling (GEP) and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). A panel of 10 dermatologists with significant expertise in the treatment of CM gathered to review the articles and create consensus statements. A modified Delphi process was used to approve each statement and a strength of recommendation was assigned using widely recognized Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy criteria.METHODSA comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was completed for English-language original research articles on the topics of non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic testing for CM, including gene expression profiling (GEP) and electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). A panel of 10 dermatologists with significant expertise in the treatment of CM gathered to review the articles and create consensus statements. A modified Delphi process was used to approve each statement and a strength of recommendation was assigned using widely recognized Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy criteria.The literature search produced 200 articles that met the criteria. A screening of the studies resulted in 19 articles. These were distributed to all panelists for review prior to a roundtable discussion. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 7 consensus statements and recommendations, 5 of which were given a strength of "A", 1 of which was given a strength of "B," and 1 of which was given a strength of "C".RESULTSThe literature search produced 200 articles that met the criteria. A screening of the studies resulted in 19 articles. These were distributed to all panelists for review prior to a roundtable discussion. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 7 consensus statements and recommendations, 5 of which were given a strength of "A", 1 of which was given a strength of "B," and 1 of which was given a strength of "C".The 2-GEP test and EIS can aid in the precise diagnosis of clinically indeterminate lesions and the 23-GEP test can be used when histopathology is equivocal. The 31-GEP test can enhance prognostic assessment beyond AJCC8 staging and improve clinical decision-making. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):774-781. doi:10.36849/JDD.8365R1.CONCLUSIONThe 2-GEP test and EIS can aid in the precise diagnosis of clinically indeterminate lesions and the 23-GEP test can be used when histopathology is equivocal. The 31-GEP test can enhance prognostic assessment beyond AJCC8 staging and improve clinical decision-making. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(9):774-781. doi:10.36849/JDD.8365R1