The Single-Case Data Analysis Package: Analysing Single-Case Experiments with R Software

The RcmdrPlugin.SCDA plug-in package is discussed. It integrates three R packages in the R commander interface: SCVA (for Single-Case Visual Analysis), SCRT (for Single-Case Randomization Tests), and SCMA (for Single-Case Meta-Analysis). This way the plug-in package covers three important steps in the analysis of single-case data

Data-division-specific robustness and power of randomization tests for ABAB designs

This study deals with the statistical properties of a randomization test applied to an ABAB design in cases where the desirable random assignment of the points of change in phase is not possible. In order to obtain information about each possible data division we carried out a conditional Monte Carlo simulation with 100,000 samples for each systematically chosen triplet. Robustness and power are studied under several experimental conditions: different autocorrelation levels and different effect sizes, as well as different phase lengths determined by the points of change. Type I error rates were distorted by the presence of autocorrelation for the majority of data divisions. Satisfactory Type II error rates were obtained only for large treatment effects. The relationship between the lengths of the four phases appeared to be an important factor for the robustness and the power of the randomization test

A permutation solution to test for treatment effects in alternation design single-case experiments

Research involving a clinical intervention is normally aimed at testing the treatment effects on a dependent variable, which is assumed to be a relevant indicator of health or quality-of-life status. In much clinical research large-n trials are in fact impractical because the availability of individuals within well-defined categories is limited in this application field. This makes it more and more important to concentrate on single-case experiments. The goal with these is to investigate the presence of a difference in the effect of the treatments considered in the study. In this setting, valid inference generally cannot be made using the parametric statistical procedures that are typically used for the analysis of clinical trials and other large-n designs. Hence, nonparametric tools can be a valid alternative to analyze this kind of data. We propose a permutation solution to assess treatment effects in single-case experiments within alternation designs. An extension to the case of more than two treatments is also presented. A simulation study shows that the approach is both reliable under the null hypothesis and powerful under the alternative, and that it improves the performance of a considered competitor. In the end, we present the results of a real case application. © 2014 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.status: publishe

Data-division-specific robustness and power of randomization tests for ABAB designs

This study deals with the statistical properties of a randomization test applied to an ABAB design in cases where the desirable random assignment of the points of change in phase is not possible. To obtain information about each possible data division, the authors carried out a conditional Monte Carlo simulation with 100,000 samples for each systematically chosen triplet. The authors studied robustness and power under several experimental conditions—different autocorrelation levels and different effect sizes as well as different phase lengths determined by the points of change. Type I error rates were distorted by the presence of autocorrelation for the majority of data divisions. The authors obtained satisfactory Type II error rates only for large treatment effects. The relation between the lengths of the four phases appeared to be an important factor for the robustness and power of the randomization test.status: publishe

Extensions of permutation solutions to test for treatment effects in replicated single-case alternation experiments with multivariate response

Single-case experiments are frequently used to do research involving a clinical intervention, since large-n trials are often impractical in clinical research. In order to investigate a possible difference in the effect of the treatments considered in the study, nonparametric instruments are valid tools; in particular, permutation solutions work well when we wish to assess differences in treatment effects. We present an extension of a permutation solution to the multivariate response case and to the case of replicated single-case experiments. A simulation study shows that the approach is both reliable under the null hypothesis and powerful under the alternative. At the end, we present the results of an application to two real experiments. © 2014 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.status: publishe

The influence of previous strategy use on individuals' subsequent strategy choice: Findings from a numerosity judgement task

We conducted two experiments to test whether individuals’ strategy choices in a numerosity judgement task are affected by the strategy that was used on the previous trials. Both experiments demonstrated that a previously used strategy indeed influences individuals’ strategy choices. Individuals were more inclined to reuse the strategy that they had used on the previous trials. However, this study also demonstrated that this influence is limited to those items that do not have a strong association with a specific strategy. Possible underlying mechanisms for the observed effect are discussed.status: publishe

Data-division-specific robustness and power of randomization tests for ABAB designs

This study deals with the statistical properties of a randomization test applied to an ABAB design in cases where the desirable random assignment of the points of change in phase is not possible. In order to obtain information about each possible data division we carried out a conditional Monte Carlo simulation with 100,000 samples for each systematically chosen triplet. Robustness and power are studied under several experimental conditions: different autocorrelation levels and different effect sizes, as well as different phase lengths determined by the points of change. Type I error rates were distorted by the presence of autocorrelation for the majority of data divisions. Satisfactory Type II error rates were obtained only for large treatment effects. The relationship between the lengths of the four phases appeared to be an important factor for the robustness and the power of the randomization test