20 research outputs found
Treatment of white coat HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET 2) - feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (study protocol)
The results of HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) were crucial in providing evidence of benefit of the treatment of hypertension in those 80 years or older. Following a subsequent sub study analysis of the HYVET data there is a suggestion that 50% of patients in the main study had White Coat Hypertension (WCH), defined as clinic BP readings >140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP readings <135/85 mmHg. Currently, definitive evidence in support of treatment for such individuals is not available. HYVET 2 has been designed in order to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial which might determine whether the treatment of WCH in the very elderly is clinically beneficial. One hundred participants aged ≥75 years diagnosed with WCH will be recruited from General Practices (GPs) in UK. Randomization will be 1:1 to a treatment arm (indapamide and perindopril) and control arm (no treatment) and follow up will be for 52 weeks. HYVET 2 will report on feasibility outcomes including participant recruitment, adherence and withdrawal rates, willingness of GPs to recruit and randomize patients and the frequency of a composite of cardiovascular events. Simple descriptive statistics will be presented
Recommended from our members
[Abstract] P-33 treatment of white coat Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET 2) – A UK feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
No description supplie
Risks and benefits in the trial of the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly
Antihypertensive drugs in very old people: a subgroup meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Background : A beneficial clinical effect of antihypertensive drug treatment has been observed in middle age and in those hypertensive patients over 60 years old, but uncertainty remains on its benefit after 80 years of age. The ageing of the general population, and the increasing prevalence of hypertension with age, make this an important public health question.
Methods : We collected data from all participants aged 80 years and over in randomised controlled trials of antihypertensive drug treatment, through direct contacts of study investigators. Our primary outcome was fatal and non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes were death from all causes, cardiovascular death, fatal and non-fatal major coronary and cardiovascular events, and heart failure.
Findings : The meta-analysis of data from 1670 participants aged 80 years or more suggested that treatment prevented 34% (95% CI : 8 to 52%) of strokes. Also, major cardiovascular events and heart failure were significantly reduced by 22% and 39%, respectively. However, there was no benefit for cardiovascular death, and a non-significant 6% relative excess of death from all causes (95% CI : -5% to 18%).
Interpretation : The inconclusive findings for mortality contrast with the benefit observed on non-fatal events, and illustrate the need to have the results of a large scale specific trial, before definitely concluding that antihypertensive treatment is beneficial in very elderly hypertensives. Meanwhile, there is no solid argument to fix a threshold of age above which hypertension should not be treated
Acute phase proteins, C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein, as prognostic markers in the elderly inpatient
Cardiovascular and biochemical risk factors for incident dementia in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.
OBJECTIVES: Several cardiovascular and biochemical factors including hypertension have been associated with cognitive decline and dementia, although both epidemiological and intervention evidence is mixed with the majority of studies examining those in midlife or younger elderly and the recent Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial showing no significant association between blood pressure lowering and incident dementia. It has also been suggested that risk factors may differ in the very elderly. The aim of these analyses was to examine the impact of baseline cardiovascular and biochemical factors upon incident dementia and cognitive decline in a very elderly hypertensive group. METHODS: Participants of the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial were aged at least 80 years and hypertensive. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and annually with diagnostic information collected for dementia and relationships between baseline total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, creatinine, glucose, haemoglobin, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, previous stroke and later dementia/cognitive decline were examined. RESULTS: There were 3336 participants with longitudinal cognitive function data. In multivariate analyses higher creatinine was associated with a lower risk of incident dementia and cognitive decline. Higher total and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with lower risk of cognitive decline. Other variables were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In very elderly hypertensive patients heart failure, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, prior stroke, glucose and haemoglobin levels did not demonstrate a relationship with cognitive decline or dementia. Higher creatinine (excluding moderate renal impairment) was associated with a lower risk of dementia and cognitive decline. The findings for total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol add to the varied literature in this area and together these findings may add weight to the suggestion that risk factor profiles differ in the very elderly
Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether baseline systolic blood pressure variability was a risk factor for stroke, cardiovascular mortality or cardiac events during the Syst-Eur trial. DESIGN: The Syst-Eur study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, powered to detect differences in stroke rate between participants on active antihypertensive treatment and placebo. Systolic blood pressure variability measurements were made on 744 participants at the start of the trial. Systolic blood pressure variability was calculated over three time frames: 24 h, daytime and night-time. The placebo and active treatment subgroups were analysed separately using an intention-to-treat principle, adjusting for confounding factors using a multiple Cox regression model. PARTICIPANTS: An elderly hypertensive European population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stroke, cardiac events (fatal and non-fatal heart failure, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and sudden death) and cardiovascular mortality (death attributed to stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, sudden death, pulmonary embolus, peripheral vascular disease and aortic dissection). RESULTS: The risk of stroke increased by 80% (95% confidence interval: 17-176%) for every 5 mmHg increase in night-time systolic blood pressure variability in the placebo group. Risk of cardiovascular mortality and cardiac events was not significantly altered. Daytime variability readings did not predict outcome. Antihypertensive treatment did not affect systolic blood pressure variability over the median 4.4-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: In the placebo group, but not the active treatment group, increased night-time systolic blood pressure variability on admission to the Syst-Eur trial was an independent risk factor for stroke during the trial.status: publishe
Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic voltages and their serial changes in elderly with systolic hypertension
The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of ECG voltages at baseline and their serial changes during follow-up in a large prospective study with standardized follow-up and strictly defined end points. Patients who were 60 years old or older, with systolic blood pressure of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic pressure <95 mm Hg, were randomized into the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe trial. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine, which could be combined with or replaced by enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, or both. At the end of the double-blind part of the trial (median follow-up, 2.0 years), follow-up was extended and all patients received active study drugs (median total follow-up, 6.1 years). Electrocardiography was performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. Electrocardiographic left ventricular mass was prospectively defined as the sum of 3 voltages (RaVL+SV1+RV5), which averaged 3.1+/-1.0 mV. The adjusted relative hazard rate, associated with a 1 mV higher sum at baseline, amounted to 1.10 and 1.15 for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and to 1.21 and 1.18 for strokes and cardiac events, respectively (P< or =0.01 for all). A 1-mV decrease in electrocardiographic voltages during follow-up independently predicted a lower incidence of cardiac events (relative hazard rate: 0.86; P< or =0.05), but not of stroke or mortality. In conclusion, electrocardiographic voltages at baseline and their serial changes during follow-up predict subsequent events in older patients with systolic hypertension.status: publishe
Baseline characteristics of participants in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET).
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) is a randomized double-blind trial of active antihypertensive treatment (indapamide 1.5 mg sustained release +/-2-4 mg perindopril) vs placebo in participants over the age of 80 years with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 160-199 mmHg during a placebo run-in period plus a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of<110 mmHg. The trial has completed with 3845 subjects randomized and we report the baseline characteristics. The participants were a healthy group. The numbers smoking, drinking alcohol and having previous cardiovascular events were low, and their hypertensive status was not usually associated with the metabolic syndrome; 1.0% of the whole group had a total cholesterol over 8.0 mmol/l, 1.1% a blood sugar over 11.1 mmol/l (irrespective of anti-diabetic treatment) and 1.7% a serum urate over 460 micromol/l (women) and 0.6% over 520 micromol/l (men). A serum creatinine over 150 micromol/l excluded participants from the trial. The gender differences and age comparisons were as expected but the women had higher average total and high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol blood concentrations. Those with prior cardiovascular disease had an excess of the known cardiovascular risk factors. The baseline characteristics provide a basis for further understanding of the HYVET results, which have been published recently
Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET): protocol for the main trial.
A number of trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated clear benefits of blood pressure (BP) reduction in patients aged or =80 years to determine whether there is a significant benefit from treatment in this age group. A meta-analysis of intervention trials that recruited patients aged > or =80 years has suggested a benefit in terms of stroke reduction but has also raised the possibility of an increase in total mortality. The benefit to risk ratio therefore needs to be clearly established before recommendations can be made for treating very elderly patients with hypertension. The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) pilot recruited 1283 patients aged > or =80 years and showed the feasibility of performing such a trial in this age group. It was a Prospective Randomised Open Blinded End-Points (PROBE) design but the main trial has additional pharmaceutical sponsorship to run a double-blind trial. Therefore, the main trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to assess the benefits of treating very elderly patients with hypertension. It compares placebo with a low dose diuretic (indapamide sustained release 1.5mg daily) and additional ACE inhibitor (perindopril) therapy if required. As in the pilot trial, the primary end-point is stroke events (fatal and non-fatal) and the trial is designed to determine whether or not a 35% difference occurs between placebo and active treatment. The main objective will be achieved with 90% power at the 1% level of significance. Secondary outcome measures will include total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, stroke mortality and skeletal fracture. 2100 patients aged > or =80 years are to be recruited and followed up for an average of 5 years. Entry BP criteria after 2 months of a single-blind placebo run-in period are a sustained sitting systolic BP (SBP) of 160 to 199mm Hg and a diastolic BP of 90 to 109mm Hg. The standing SBP must be >140mm Hg. The trial will be carried out in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. We describe in detail the protocol for the main trial and discuss the reasons for the changes from the pilot, the use of the drug regimen, and the BP criteria to be used in the trial