Scandinavian trial of uncomplicated aortic dissection therapy : study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Peer reviewe

Editor's Choice - The Impact of Centralisation and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Based on International Registries

Objectives: Current management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) varies among centres and countries, particularly in the degree of implementation of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and levels of vascular surgery centralisation. This study assesses these variations and the impact they have on outcomes. Materials and methods: RAAA repairs from vascular surgical registries in 11 countries, 2010-2013, were investigated. Data were analysed overall, per country, per treatment modality (EVAR or open aortic repair [OAR]), centre volume (quintiles IV), and whether centres were predominantly EVAR (>= 50% of RAAA performed with EVAR [EVAR(p)]) or predominantly OAR [OAR(p)]. Primary outcome was peri-operative mortality. Data are presented as either mean values or percentages with 95% CI within parentheses, and compared with chi-square tests, as well as with adjusted OR. Results: There were 9273 patients included. Mean age was 74.7 (74.5-74.9) years, and 82.7% of patients were men (81.9-83.6). Mean AAA diameter at rupture was 7.6 cm (7.5-7.6). Of these aneurysms, 10.7% (10.0-11.4) were less than 5.5 cm. EVAR was performed in 23.1% (22.3-24.0). There were 6817 procedures performed in OAR(p) centres and 1217 performed in EVAR(p) centres. Overall peri-operative mortality was 28.8% (27.9-29.8). Peri-operative mortality for OAR was 32.1% (31.0-33.2) and for EVAR 17.9% (16.3-19.6), p 22 repairs per year), 23.3% (21.2-25.4) than in QII-V, 30.0% (28.9-31.1), p <.001. Peri-operative mortality after OAR was lower in high volume centres compared with the other centres, 25.3% (23.0-27.6) and 34.0% (32.7-35.4), respectively, p <.001. There was no significant difference in peri-operative mortality after EVAR between centres based on volume. Conclusions: Peri-operative mortality is lower in centres with a primary EVAR approach or with high case volume. Most repairs, however, are still performed in low volume centres and in centres with a primary OAR strategy. Reorganisation of acute vascular surgical services may improve outcomes of RAAA repair. (C) 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Peer reviewe

On Surgical Treatment of Aortic Pathology

The use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms has advanced from a premature characterization as a “failed experiment” in early 2000 to the predominant modern method of treatment. Technology has accommodated initial shortcomings, but it has also led to expansions in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and complex aortic pathologies. The overall aim of this thesis is to characterize the contemporary utilization of endovascular repair in the international setting and to evaluate its expanding use in complex aortic disease treatment. Paper I is an analysis of outcomes after intact aneurysm treatment from registries of 12 countries. From 2005 to 2013, and with 83,253 patients included, it was shown that the use of EVAR has increased while, the perioperative mortality has decreased. This was counterbalanced by a worsening mortality for those patients treated with open aortic repair. Paper II is an analysis of ruptured aneurysms from the above-mentioned international registries. EVAR is also increasing for these patients, although open repair is still the predominant treatment strategy in most centres. Perioperative mortality was superior for EVAR patients, despite increased age and comorbidities. An association between patient-volume and perioperative mortality could be shown for open repair, but the same could not be demonstrated for EVAR. Paper III is an evaluation of the adaptation of a total endovascular approach for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms from a single centre. The technical success and midterm mortality, as well as post-operative complications, including spinal ischemia, were similar to those reported from large and multi-centre analyses. Previous studies reveal disparate results for centres performing open complex aortic repair. The results here suggest that a total endovascular approach is feasible for dedicated centres contemplating this strategy.   Paper IV is an analysis of multiple pre-, peri-, and post-operative variables documented from complex aneurysm procedures. A relationship between increased complexity and variables such as anaesthesia duration, bleeding, hospital stay, and radiation exposure was found. As patients and their comorbidities increase, a decision to embark on a complex procedure should be made with due diligence to these relationships. Paper V is a technical analysis of patients following acute treatment for Type A aortic dissections. Many patients are unfit for open aortic arch repair. Based on current availability of endovascular aortic stentgrafts, it was shown that the majority of patients can be treated endovascularly, while anticipated device improvements should further increase the proportion of eligibility.

Red blood cell transfusion associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BackgroundRed blood cell (RBC) transfusions are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this analysis was to examine the association between RBC transfusions and long-term survival for patients undergoing elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with up to 15 years of follow-up.MethodsProspective cohort study using data from The Danish Vascular Registry from 2000-2015. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital complications. Transfused patients were divided into subgroups based on received RBC transfusions (1, 2-3, 4-5 or > 5). Using Cox regression multi-adjusted analysis, non-transfused patients were compared to transfused patients (1, 2-3, 4-5, >5 transfusions) for both primary and secondary endpoints.ResultsThere were 3 876 patients included with a mean survival of 9.1 years. There were 801 patients who did not receive transfusions. Overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (121 patients) and 3.6% (112) for all transfused patients. For the five subgroups 30-day mortality was: No transfusions 1.1% (9 patients), 1 RBC 1.2% (4 patients), 2-3 RBC 2.2% (26 patients), 4-5 RBC 1.9% (14 patients) and > 5 RBC 7.9% (68 patients). After receiving RBCs, the hazard ratio for death was 1.54 (95% CI 1.27-1.85) compared to non-transfused patients. There was a significant increase in mortality when receiving 2-3 RBC: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.07-1.62), 4-5 RBC: 1.64 (1.32-2.03) and >5 RBC: 1.96 (1.27-1.85) in a multi-adjusted model.ConclusionThere is a dose-dependent association between RBC transfusions received during elective AAA repair and an increase in short- and long-term mortality. Approximately 25% of included patients had preoperative anemia. These findings should raise awareness regarding potentially unnecessary and harmful RBC transfusions

Short-term and Mid-term Outcomes after Use of the Native Infrarenal Aorta as Distal Landing Zone for Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

Background: This study aimed to examine outcomes after use of the native infrarenal aorta as distal landing zone for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal-thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PRAA-TAAA). Methods: All F-BEVAR procedures for treatment of PRAA-TAAA (2011-2019) at 2 aortic centers were examined. The outcomes of interest were as follows: i) technical success, ii) perioperative morbidity, iii) preservation of lumbar arteries and the inferior mesenteric artery, iv) type IB endoleaks, v) reinterventions, vi) survival, vii) aneurysm sac behavior, and viii) infrarenal aortic changes. Results: Twenty consecutive patients with distal landing in the native infrarenal aorta were included (median age 71 years; 25% men). The median number of visible lumbar arteries at baseline was 7, and a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) before the operation was present in 19 (95%) of the cases. There were no deaths within 30 days. One patient (5%), operated on with a 4-BEVAR for a type 2 TAAA, experienced spinal cord ischemia (permanent paraplegia). The median decrease in the number of visible lumbar arteries at the first postoperative scan was 3 from the baseline value, whereas a patent IMA was preserved in 12 out of 19 patients. Only in one case (5%), a type IB endoleak was noted for an overall technical success rate of 95%, which required a standard EVAR 20 months after the initial operation. The median follow-up duration for the study cohort was 491 days; all patients were alive at the longest available individual follow-up, and no instances of new-onset type IB endoleaks were observed. Another 3 late reinterventions (in addition to the one mentioned previously) were performed during midterm follow-up, all because of target vessel instability. In patients with &gt;= 12 months of follow-up after the index procedure (n = 12, 60% of the entire cohort), no instances of aneurysm sac increase &gt;5 mm were noted; the median largest aortic diameter was 51 mm with a median difference from baseline of -6 mm. The median distal landing zone diameter increase was 4 mm from baseline but never beyond the nominal stent-graft diameter, whereas the median aortic bifurcation diameter differed 1 mm from baseline. Conclusions: This preliminary experience shows that the use of the native infrarenal aorta as a distal landing zone for F-BEVAR is safe in the short term and midterm in patients with suitable anatomy, allowing the sparing of collateral vessels. Longer follow-up is warranted to assess durability

Technical eligibility for endovascular treatment of the aortic arch after open type A aortic dissection repair

Objective The objective was to report on the technical eligibility of patients previously treated for Stanford type A aorta dissection for endovascular aortic arch repair based on contemporary anatomic criteria for an arch inner-branched stent graft. Methods All patients treated for type A aorta dissection from 2004 to 2015 at a single aortic center were identified. Extent of repair and use of circulatory arrest were reported. Survival and reoperation were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and competing risk models. Anatomic assessment was performed using 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging software. Primary outcome was survival of 1 year or more and fulfillment of the arch inner-branched stent graft anatomic criteria. Results A total of 198 patients were included (158 DeBakey I, 32 DeBakey II, and 8 intramural hematoma). Mortality was 30 days (16.2%), 1 year (16.3%), and 10 years (45.0%). A total of 129 patients had imaging beyond 1 year (mean, 47.8 months), and 89 patients (69.0%) were eligible for arch inner-branched stent grafting. During follow-up, 19 patients (14.7%) met the threshold criteria for aortic arch treatment, of whom 14 (73.7%) would be considered eligible for arch inner-branched stent graft. Patients who underwent type A aorta dissection repair with circulatory arrest and no distal clamp were more often eligible for endovascular repair (88.8%) than those operated with a distal clamp (72.5%; P = .021). Among patients who did not meet the arch inner-branched stent graft anatomic criteria, the primary reasons were mechanical valve (40%) and insufficient proximal seal (30%). Conclusions More than two-thirds of patients post–type A aorta dissection repair are technically eligible for endovascular arch inner-branched stent graft repair. The development of devices that can accommodate a mechanical aortic valve and a greater awareness of sufficient graft length would significantly increase availability