24 research outputs found

    A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Get PDF
    © Verbruggen et al. Response inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in some of these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide 12 easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when they are not followed. Furthermore, we provide user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis

    A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.

    Get PDF
    Response inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in some of these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide 12 easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when they are not followed. Furthermore, we provide user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis

    Reactive and Proactive Adaptation of Cognitive and Motor Neural Signals during Performance of a Stop-Change Task

    No full text
    The ability to inhibit or suppress unwanted or inappropriate actions, is an essential component of executive function and cognitive health. The immense selective pressure placed on maintaining inhibitory control processes is exemplified by the relatively small number of instances in which these systems completely fail in the average person’s daily life. Although mistakes and errors do inevitably occur, inhibitory control systems not only ensure that this number is low, but have also adapted behavioral strategies to minimize future failures. The ability of our brains to adapt our behavior and appropriately engage proper motor responses is traditionally depicted as the primary domain of frontal brain areas, despite evidence to the fact that numerous other brain areas contribute. Using the stop-signal task as a common ground for comparison, we review a large body of literature investigating inhibitory control processes across frontal, temporal, and midbrain structures, focusing on our recent work in rodents, in an effort to understand how the brain biases action selection and adapts to the experience of conflict.https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci1105061

    Running increases the number of dendritic spines in medial prefrontal cortex and expression of synaptic markers in several regions supporting cognitive function.

    No full text
    <p><i>A</i>, Running increases dendritic spine density on both apical and basal dendrites in the medial prefrontal cortex. <i>B</i>, Representative images of DiI labeled layer 2/3 pyramidal neuron apical dendrites in the medial prefrontal cortex and in sedentary and running animals. Scale Bar = 5 μm. <i>C</i>, Running increases the average length of spine processes. <i>D</i>, Optical intensity analysis of synaptophysin (SYN) reveals increased expression in all regions studied. <i>Inset</i>: example of synaptophysin staining in medial prefrontal cortex. <i>E</i>, PSD-95 levels are also increased in all regions studied. <i>Inset</i>: example of PSD-95 staining in medial prefrontal cortex. Scale Bar = 10 μm. Error bars represent SEM. *<i>p</i><0.05 compared with sedentary for A, C-E.</p

    Running enhances cognitive performance on tasks known to require the medial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex.

    No full text
    <p><i>A</i>, Running enhances performance on the object in place (OIP) task, but not on the novel object preference (NOP) task. <i>B</i>, Running results in fewer trials to criterion on the SD, REV and EDS. <i>C</i>, Running results in fewer errors on the SD, REV and EDS. Error bars represent SEM. *<i>p</i><0.05 compared with sedentary rats for A-C. Complex discrimination (CD); intradimensional shift (IDS).</p

    In Vitro and In Vivo Sequestration of Phencyclidine by Me4Cucurbit[8]uril

    No full text
    This work describes the in vitro binding of CB[8] and Me4CB[8] toward a panel of 10 drugs of abuse, and in vitro and in vivo assays to demonstrate the biocompatibility of Me4CB[8]. In vivo efficacy studies show that Me4CB[8] can control the hyper locomotion of animals treated with PCP

    Anthracene-Walled Acyclic CB[n] Receptors: in vitro and in vivo Binding Properties toward Drugs of Abuse

    No full text
    We report studies of the interaction of six acyclic CB[n]-type receptors toward a panel of drugs of abuse by a combination of isothermal titration calorimetry and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Anthracene walled acyclic CB[n] host (M3) displays highest binding affinity toward methamphetamine (Kd=15 nM) and fentanyl (Kd=4 nM). Host M3 is well tolerated by Hep G2 and HEK 293 cells up to 100 μM according to MTS metabolic and adenylate kinase release assays. An in vivo maximum tolerated dose study with Swiss Webster mice showed no adverse effects at the highest dose studied (44.7 mg kg−1). Host M3 is not mutagenic based on the Ames fluctuation test and does not inhibit the hERG ion channel. In vivo efficacy studies showed that pretreatment of mice with M3 significantly reduces the hyperlocomotion after treatment with methamphetamine, but M3 does not function similarly when administered 30 seconds after methamphetamine.https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.20220004
    corecore