37 research outputs found

    Pain expression in children with an intellectual disability

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND: : Children with an intellectual disability (ID) are sometimes unable to verbalize and describe their painful experience; therefore family members and health carers can assess the intensity of the pain only from the behaviour exhibited by the children.AIM AND METHOD: The purpose of this descriptive and exploratory study was to examine the behavioural pain expression in 30 children with ID aged from 5 to 18 years in a surgical context. Children were matched with 30 typically developing children of the same chronological age and 30 typically developing children of the same developmental age.RESULTS: The results showed the influence of the level of expressive communication on the pain expression. Children who were able to verbalize their pain exhibited a normative pain expression with behavioural traits similar to those of typically developing children of the same developmental age. Children who were unable to verbalize their pain produced particular pain expressions with behavioural traits that were atypical and without a communicative goal.CONCLUSION: Pain expression modalities are extremely different between children able to verbalize their pain and those unable to do so. This study confirmed the necessity to take into account the particularities of each child with ID in order to individualize the pain management and avoid misdiagnosis and the under treating of pain in non verbal children

    Qualité de vie péri-opératoire des enfants (validation psychométrique des échelles de la douleur et de l'anxiété)

    No full text
    MONTPELLIER-BU Médecine UPM (341722108) / SudocMONTPELLIER-BU Médecine (341722104) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Epidemiology of regional anesthesia in children: Lessons learned from the european multi-institutional study APRICOT.

    No full text
    Recently, the European prospective observational multicenter cohort study, APRICOT, reported anesthesia techniques and complications in more than 31 000 pediatric procedures. The main objective of this study was to analyze the current practice in regional anesthesia in the 33 countries that participated to APRICOT

    Facial expressions of pain in daily clinical practice to assess postoperative pain in children: Reliability and validity of the facial action summary score

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Behavioural pain scales are recommended to assess postoperative pain for children who are too young to use self-report tools. Their main limitation is underestimation of pain in the days following an intervention. Although relevant, facial expression is not used in daily clinical practice. This prospective study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Facial Action Summary Score (FASS), a five-item scale, to assess postoperative pain until hospital discharge in children 0.8). Sensitivity to change was verified by a significant decrease in the score after rescue analgesia. For a threshold of 2/5, the FASS shows excellent specificity (97%) and sensitivity (82%). The low number of false negatives is the main strength of this tool.Conclusions: This work highlights the interest in using facial expression in daily clinical practice to manage postoperative pain. The FASS is easy to use with excellent psychometric properties and is particularly sensitive to measure pain in the days following surgery.Significance: The aim of this study was to prove that facial expression of pain can be used in clinical practice to measure postoperative pain in children. The reduced number of false negatives is the main strength of this tool

    Does the sciatic nerve approach influence thigh tourniquet tolerance during below-knee surgery?

    No full text
    In this prospective, randomized, blinded study we assessed thigh tourniquet tolerance when a Labat's or a posterior popliteal approach of the sciatic nerve was used for below-knee surgery. One-hundred-twenty patients were divided into two groups of 60. A posterior popliteal (Group 1) or a Labat's (Group 2) sciatic nerve block was performed with 25 mL 1% mepivacaine + epinephrine 1:200,000. In both groups, a femoral nerve block was achieved. Patient comfort during block performance, sensory block, success rate, and thigh tourniquet tolerance were recorded. Performance of the block was significantly more comfortable in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.01). Completeness of the block at t(30 min.) and success rate were comparable in both groups. Thigh tourniquet pain increased with time in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups. We conclude that despite a complete sensory blockade of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve in 91% of the patients, Labat's approach of the sciatic nerve provides no better thigh tourniquet tolerance than the popliteal approach. The popliteal approach is as efficient but more comfortable for the patient and is the preferred technique for below-knee surgery

    Childhood preoperative anxiolysis: Is sedation and distraction better than either alone? A prospective randomized study

    No full text
    International audiencePreoperative anxiety management receives special attention in pediatric anesthesia. Different pharmacological and nonpharmacological techniques can be employed. This study was designed to assess three different strategies for childhood preoperative anxiolysis: midazolam premedication, midazolam in combination with portable Digital Video-Disk player, or video distraction strategy alone. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, children aged 2-12 years were assigned to one of the three study groups. The primary outcome was a change in preoperative children's anxiety, from baseline (before transfer to the preanesthetic holding area) to separation from parents, assessed by the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) and the Visual Analog Anxiety Scale (VAS-Anxiety). Delirium emergence, postoperative pain, and parental satisfaction were also collected. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients were enrolled. The three preventive strategies allowed control of preoperative distress. Within the three study groups, no significant change was objectified in the anxiety level from baseline to separation from parents (mean change in mYPAS midazolam group: 2.4 95% CI [-1.7 to 6.3]; midazolam+Digital Video-Disk group: -1.0 95% CI [-5.9 to 3]; and Digital Video-Disk group: 1.4 95% CI [-4 to 6.7]). Comparison of change in preoperative children's anxiety between the groups did not show any difference. Emergence delirium, postoperative pain scores, and analgesic consumption were similar between the groups and parents' satisfaction was excellent. CONCLUSION: Both pharmacological premedication and video distraction are effective strategies for controlling preoperative childhood anxiety. The combination of midazolam and Digital Video-Disk player was not better than either alone

    Combination of real-time needle-tip pressure sensing and minimal intensity stimulation limits unintentional intraneural injection during an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block procedure: A randomized, parallel group, controlled trial

    No full text
    International audienceStudy objective: Ultrasound guidance does not eliminate the risk of intraneural injection, which must be avoided during PNB. Combining ultrasound guidance (USG), nerve stimulation (NS), and injection pressure monitoring is advocated to prevent nerve injury during PNB. We hypothesized that combining patient-tailored dynamic NS and real-time pressure sensing (RTPS) could reduce the incidence of intraneural injection and nerve puncture during USG PNB compared with a traditional fixed thresholds (Control) procedure.Design: Randomized, prospective study.Setting: Operating room.Patients: One hundred ASA physical status I to III patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.Interventions: Patient anesthetized using axillary, sciatic or femoral USG PNB were randomized to the PresStim group (Dynamic RTPS and NS set at 1.5 mA then decreased; n = 50) or Control group (fixed thresholds for in-line pressure mechanical manometer and NS at 0.2 mA; n = 50).Measurements: Procedural ultrasound images and videos were recorded, stored and reviewed in random order by two experts in ultrasound-guided PNB blinded to the group. They noted the needle-to-nerve relationship and intraneural injection for all blocked nerves.Main results: One hundred and twenty-three USG PNBs were performed (56 axillary brachial plexus blocks, 40 femoral nerve blocks and 27 sciatic popliteal nerve blocks); 235 blocked nerves and videos were recorded and analyzed (PresStim, 118; Control, 117). Less paresthesia was noted in the PresStim group (12.7%) compared with the Control group (18.8%). The risk of intraneural injection was significantly higher in the Control group (odds ratio [OR], 17.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-135, P = 0.007). The risk of nerve puncture (OR, 22.7; 95% CI, 2.9-175, p = 0.003) and needle-nerve contact (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.4-9.5, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the Control group than the PresStim group.Conclusions: Under the conditions of the study, dynamic triple monitoring combining RTPS, NS and USG decreases intraneural injection and unintentional needle-nerve contact and puncture during a PNB procedure
    corecore