Warfarin dose and INR related to genotypes of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 in patients with myocardial infarction

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Warfarin treatment has a narrow therapeutic range, requiring meticulous monitoring and dosage titration. Individual dosage requirement has recently partly been explained by genetic variation of the warfarin metabolizing enzyme CYP2C9 and the Vitamin K-activating enzyme VKORC1. In the WARIS-II study, comparing three different antithrombotic regimens after myocardial infarction, warfarin treatment reduced thrombotic events, but was associated with more frequent bleeding than use of acetylsalisylic acid (ASA) alone.</p> <p>Aims</p> <p>The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the relation between genotypes of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 and warfarin maintenance dose in myocardial infarction. The secondary aim was to relate the genotypes to international normalized ratio (INR).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Genotyping was performed in 212 myocardial infarction patients from the WARIS-II study by robotic isolation of DNA from EDTA whole blood (MagNa Pure LC) before PCR amplification (LightCycler) and melting point analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The 420 C>T substitution of CYP2C9*2, the 1075 A>C substitution of CYP2C9*3 and the 1173 C>T substitution of VKORC1 had minor allele frequencies of, 11.3%, 5.7% and 36.6% respectively. Warfarin weekly dose varied between 17 mg and 74 mg among the patients. INR did not vary between genotypes. Warfarin dosage requirement was significantly associated with CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes, treatment group and age. The VKORC1 genotype contributed 24.5% to the interindividual variation in warfarin dosage, whereas the combined CYP2C9 genotypes were only responsible for 7.2% of the dose variation.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotype frequencies in myocardial infarction patients appear similar to other patient groups and have similar impact on warfarin maintenance dose.</p

Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensive medication for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and multiple treatments meta-analysis

Background: We conducted a systematic review of evidence from randomized controlled trials to answer the following research question: What are the relative effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease outcomes for healthy people at risk of cardiovascular disease? Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (up to February 2011) and CENTRAL (up to May 2009), and reference lists in recent systematic reviews. Titles and abstracts were assessed for relevance and those potentially fulfilling our inclusion criteria were then assessed in full text. Two reviewers made independent assessments at each step. We selected the following main outcomes: total mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke. We also report on angina, heart failure and incidence of diabetes. We conducted a multiple treatments meta-analysis using random-effects models. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE-instrument. Results: We included 25 trials. Overall, the results were mixed, with few significant dif-ferences, and with no drugclass standing out as superior across multiple outcomes. The only significant finding for total mortality based on moderate to high quality evidence was that beta-blockers (atenolol) were inferior to angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (relative risk (RR) 1.14; 95% credibility interval (CrI) 1.02 to 1.28). Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)- inhibitors came out inferior to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) regarding stroke-risk (RR 1.19; 1.03 to 1.38), but superior regarding risk of heart failure (RR 0.82; 0.69 to 0.94), both based on moderate quality evidence. Diuretics reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared to beta-blockers (RR 0.82; 0.68 to 0.98), and lowered the risk of heart failure compared to CCB (RR 0.73; 0.62 to 0.84), beta-blockers (RR 0.73; 0.54 to 0.96), and alpha-blockers (RR 0.51; 0.40 to 0.64). The risk of diabetes increased with diuretics compared to ACE-inhibitors (RR 1.43; 1.12 to 1.83) and CCB (RR 1.27; 1.05 to 1.57). Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, there seems to be little or no difference between commonly used blood pressure lowering medications for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Beta-blockers (atenolol) and alpha-blockers may not be first-choice drugs as they were the only drug-classes that were not significantly superior to any other, for any outcomes

Gjennombruddsmetoden - Systematisk utålmodighet

Vi har tatt initiativ til og gjennomført et gjennombruddsprosjekt i faget matematikk ved Levanger videregående skole. Elevene som var omfattet av prosjektet er enten faglig svake eller sliter med motivasjonen for skolefag. Hovedmålet med gjennombruddsprosjektet var at 60 % av de elevene som deltok, skulle oppnå karaktermessig framgang. Dette radikale resultatmålet ble innfridd til en viss grad. 37 % av elevene oppnådde karaktermessig forbedring. Gjennomsnittskarakterene for hele elevgruppen økte med 0,4 karakterpoeng sammenlignet med ungdomsskolekarakterene. Enkeltelever som var fritatt for vurdering i matematikk på ungdomstrinnet, oppnådde oppsiktsvekkende framgang i løpet av prosjektperioden. Vi kom i tillegg fram til at lærerne lærte av hverandre og videreutviklet seg gjennom samarbeidet i gjennombruddsprosjektet. Vi erfarte også at skoleledelsens direkte involvering i arbeidet med prosjektet hadde betydning for lærernes læring og neste omgang elevenes læringsutbytte

Mortality among head trauma patients taking preinjury antithrombotic agents: a retrospective cohort analysis from a Level 1 trauma centre

Background Bleeding represents the most well-known and the most feared complications caused by the use of antithrombotic agents. There is, however, limited documentation whether pre-injury use of antithrombotic agents affects outcome after head trauma. The aim of this study was to define the relationship between the use of preinjury antithrombotic agents and mortality among elderly people sustaining blunt head trauma. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on the hospital based trauma registry at Oslo University Hospital. Patients aged 55 years or older sustaining blunt head trauma between 2004 and 2006 were included. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Separate analyses were performed for warfarin use and platelet inhibitor use. Results Of the 418 patients admitted with a diagnosis of head trauma, 137 (32.8 %) used pre-injury antithrombotic agents (53 warfarin, 80 platelet inhibitors, and 4 both). Seventy patients died (16.7 %); 15 (28.3 %) of the warfarin users, 12 (15.0 %) of the platelet inhibitor users, and two (50 %) with combined use of warfarin and platelet inhibitors, compared to 41 (14.6 %) of the non-users. There was a significant interaction effect between warfarin use and the Triage Revised Trauma Score collected upon the patients’ arrival at the hospital. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin use was associated with increased 30-day mortality among patients with normal physiology (adjusted OR 8,3; 95 % CI, 2.0 to 34.8) on admission, but not among patients with physiological derangement on admission. Use of platelet inhibitors was not associated with increased mortality. Conclusions The use of warfarin before trauma was associated with increased 30-day mortality among a subset of patients. Use of platelet inhibitors before trauma was not associated with increased mortality. These results indicate that patients on preinjury warfarin may need closer monitoring and follow up after trauma despite normal physiology on admission to the emergency department

Primærforebygging av hjerte- og karsykdom, med hovedvekt på medikamentelle tiltak

Kunnskapssenteret ble av Sosial- og helsedirektoratet (nå Helsedirektoratet) bedt om å gjennomføre en systematisk kunnskapsoppsummering om effekten av tiltak for primærforebygging av hjerte- og karsykdom. Arbeidet skulle benyttes som grunnlagsdokument for utarbeiding av nye nasjonale retningslinjer på feltet.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on pharmacological intervention

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on pharmacological interventions

Kunnskapssenteret ble av Sosial- og helsedirektoratet (nå Helsedirektoratet) bedt om å gjennomføre en systematisk kunnskapsoppsummering om effekten av tiltak for primærforebygging av hjerte- og karsykdom. Arbeidet skulle benyttes som grunnlagsdokument for utarbeiding av nye nasjonale retningslinjer på feltet.Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, with emphasis on pharmacological intervention