Tisagenlecleucel therapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in infants and children younger than 3 years of age at screening : an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study

Background Children aged younger than 3 years were excluded from the ELIANA phase 2 trial of tisagenlecleucel in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The feasibility, safety, and activity of tisagenlecleucel have not been defined in this group, the majority of whom have high-risk (KMT2A-rearranged) infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and historically poor outcomes despite intensification of chemotherapy, and for whom novel therapies are urgently needed. We aimed to provide real-world outcome analysis of the feasibility, activity, and safety of tisagenlecleucel in younger children and infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Methods We did an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study at 15 hospitals across ten countries in Europe. Eligible patients were children aged younger than 3 years at screening between Sept 1, 2018, and Sept 1, 2021, who were screened for tisagenlecleucel therapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia according to licensed indications. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of tisagenlecleucel. We tracked chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy outcomes using a standardised data reporting form. Overall survival, event-free survival, stringent event-free survival, B-cell aplasia, and toxicity were assessed in all patients who received a tisagenlecleucel infusion. Findings 38 eligible patients were screened, of whom 35 (92%) received a tisagenlecleucel infusion. 29 (76%) of 38 patients had KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and 25 (66%) had relapsed after previous allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients had previously received a median of 2 lines (IQR 2-3) of (non-HSCT) therapy. Seven (18%) of 38 patients had received inotuzumab and 14 (37%) had received blinatumomab. After a median of 14 months (IQR 9-21) of follow-up, overall survival at 12 months after tisagenlecleucel infusion was 84% (64-93; five patients had died), event-free survival was 69% (47-83; nine events), and stringent event-free survival was 41% (23-58; 18 events). The probability of ongoing B-cell aplasia was 70% (95% CI 46-84; seven events) at 12 months. Adverse events included cytokine release syndrome, which occurred at any grade in 21 (60%) of 35 patients and at grade 3 or worse in five (14%), and neurotoxicity at any grade in nine (26%), none of which were severe. Measurable residual disease-negative complete response with or without haematological recovery occurred in 24 (86%) of 28 patients who had measurable disease. Interpretation These data suggest that tisagenlecleucel has antitumour activity and has an acceptable safety profile for young children and infants with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.Peer reviewe

Convalescent plasma in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised controlled, open-label, platform trial

SummaryBackground Azithromycin has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of its immunomodulatoryactions. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azithromycin in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods In this randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial (Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19Therapy [RECOVERY]), several possible treatments were compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospitalwith COVID-19 in the UK. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients wererandomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus azithromycin 500 mg once perday by mouth or intravenously for 10 days or until discharge (or allocation to one of the other RECOVERY treatmentgroups). Patients were assigned via web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment andwere twice as likely to be randomly assigned to usual care than to any of the active treatment groups. Participants andlocal study staff were not masked to the allocated treatment, but all others involved in the trial were masked to theoutcome data during the trial. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality, assessed in the intention-to-treatpopulation. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936.Findings Between April 7 and Nov 27, 2020, of 16 442 patients enrolled in the RECOVERY trial, 9433 (57%) wereeligible and 7763 were included in the assessment of azithromycin. The mean age of these study participants was65·3 years (SD 15·7) and approximately a third were women (2944 [38%] of 7763). 2582 patients were randomlyallocated to receive azithromycin and 5181 patients were randomly allocated to usual care alone. Overall,561 (22%) patients allocated to azithromycin and 1162 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days(rate ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·87–1·07; p=0·50). No significant difference was seen in duration of hospital stay (median10 days [IQR 5 to >28] vs 11 days [5 to >28]) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days(rate ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·98–1·10; p=0·19). Among those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, nosignificant difference was seen in the proportion meeting the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilationor death (risk ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·87–1·03; p=0·24).Interpretation In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, azithromycin did not improve survival or otherprespecified clinical outcomes. Azithromycin use in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 should be restrictedto patients in whom there is a clear antimicrobial indication