Tight Cell Probe Bounds for Succinct Boolean Matrix-Vector Multiplication

The conjectured hardness of Boolean matrix-vector multiplication has been used with great success to prove conditional lower bounds for numerous important data structure problems, see Henzinger et al. [STOC'15]. In recent work, Larsen and Williams [SODA'17] attacked the problem from the upper bound side and gave a surprising cell probe data structure (that is, we only charge for memory accesses, while computation is free). Their cell probe data structure answers queries in $\tilde{O}(n^{7/4})$ time and is succinct in the sense that it stores the input matrix in read-only memory, plus an additional $\tilde{O}(n^{7/4})$ bits on the side. In this paper, we essentially settle the cell probe complexity of succinct Boolean matrix-vector multiplication. We present a new cell probe data structure with query time $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ storing just $\tilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ bits on the side. We then complement our data structure with a lower bound showing that any data structure storing $r$ bits on the side, with $n < r < n^2$ must have query time $t$ satisfying $t r = \tilde{\Omega}(n^3)$. For $r \leq n$, any data structure must have $t = \tilde{\Omega}(n^2)$. Since lower bounds in the cell probe model also apply to classic word-RAM data structures, the lower bounds naturally carry over. We also prove similar lower bounds for matrix-vector multiplication over $\mathbb{F}_2$

Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability

There has been a dramatic increase over the last decade in research on technologies for enhancing movement training and exercise for people with a disability. This paper reviews some of the recent developments in this area, using examples from a National Science Foundation initiated study of mobility research projects in Europe to illustrate important themes and key directions for future research. This paper also reviews several recent studies aimed at combining movement training with plasticity or regeneration therapies, again drawing in part from European research examples. Such combination therapies will likely involve complex interactions with motor training that must be understood in order to achieve the goal of eliminating severe motor impairment

Non-Adaptive Data Structure Bounds for Dynamic Predecessor

In this work, we continue the examination of the role non-adaptivity plays in maintaining dynamic data structures, initiated by Brody and Larsen. We consider non-adaptive data structures for predecessor search in the w-bit cell probe model. In this problem, the goal is to dynamically maintain a subset T of up to n elements from {1, ..., m}, while supporting insertions, deletions, and a predecessor query Pred(x), which returns the largest element in T that is less than or equal to x. Predecessor search is one of the most well-studied data structure problems. For this problem, using non-adaptivity comes at a steep price. We provide exponential cell probe complexity separations between (i) adaptive and non-adaptive data structures and (ii) non-adaptive and memoryless data structures for predecessor search. A classic data structure of van Emde Boas solves dynamic predecessor search in log(log(m)) probes; this data structure is adaptive. For dynamic data structures which make non-adaptive updates, we show the cell probe complexity is O(log(m)/log(w/log(m))). We also give a nearly-matching Omega(log(m)/log(w)) lower bound. We also give an m/w lower bound for memoryless data structures. Our lower bound technique is tailored to non-adaptive (as opposed to memoryless) updates and might be of independent interest

Non-Adaptive Data Structures For Predecessor Search

In this work, we continue the examination of the role non-adaptivity plays in maintaining dynamic data structures, initiated by Brody and Larsen. We consider non-adaptive data structures for predecessor search in the w-bit cell probe model. In this problem, the goal is to dynamically maintain a subset T of up to n elements from {1, ..., m}, while supporting insertions, deletions, and a predecessor query Pred(x), which returns the largest element in T that is less than or equal to x. Predecessor search is one of the most well-studied data structure problems. For this problem, using non-adaptivity comes at a steep price. We provide exponential cell probe complexity separations between (i) adaptive and non-adaptive data structures and (ii) non-adaptive and memoryless data structures for predecessor search. A classic data structure of van Emde Boas solves dynamic predecessor search in log(log(m)) probes; this data structure is adaptive. For dynamic data structures which make non-adaptive updates, we show the cell probe complexity is O(log(m)/log(w/log(m))). We also give a nearly-matching Omega(log(m)/log(w)) lower bound. We also give an m/w lower bound for memoryless data structures. Our lower bound technique is tailored to non-adaptive (as opposed to memoryless) updates and might be of independent interest