Recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the use of JAK inhibitors in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and autoimmune systemic inflammatory disease that can cause irreversible joint deformities, with increased morbidity and mortality and a significant impact on the quality of life of the affected individual. The main objective of RA treatment is to achieve sustained clinical remission or low disease activity. However, up to 40% of patients do not respond to available treatments, including bDMARDs. New therapeutic targets for RA are emerging, such as Janus kinases (JAKs). These are essential for intracellular signaling (via JAK-STAT) in response to many cytokines involved in RA immunopathogenesis. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have established themselves as a highly effective treatment, gaining increasing space in the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of RA. The current recommendations aim to present a review of the main aspects related to the efficacy and safety of JAKis in RA patients, and to update the recommendations and treatment algorithm proposed by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology in 2017

Rastreamento da infecção latente por tuberculose em pacientes com artrite idiopática juvenil previamente à terapia anti‐TNF em um país de alto risco para tuberculose

ResumoObjetivoAvaliar, em um país endêmico, a eficácia em longo prazo do rastreamento à procura de infecção latente por tuberculose (ILTB) e profilaxia primária em pacientes com AIJ em uso de bloqueadores do TNF.MétodosTrata‐se de uma coorte retrospectiva que incluiu pacientes com AIJ elegíveis para a terapia anti‐TNF. Os pacientes foram rastreados à procura de ILTB previamente ao uso de anti‐TNF por meio do teste tuberculínico (TT), radiografia de tórax e história de exposição à TB. Os indivíduos foram acompanhados regularmente em intervalos de dois meses.ResultadosIncluíram‐se 69 pacientes com AIJ com idade atual de 17,4±5,8 anos, com média de duração da doença de 5±4,9 anos; 47 pacientes receberam um único anti‐TNF, enquanto 22 foram transferidos para outro anti‐TNF uma ou duas vezes: 57 foram tratados com etanercepte, 33 com adalimumabe e três com infliximabe. O rastreamento à procura de ILTB foi positivo em três pacientes: um era TT positivo e tinha história de exposição à TB e dois apenas eram TT positivo. Não foi diagnosticado caso de TB ativa durante o período de estudo (mediana de seguimento de 3,8 anos).ConclusãoA avaliação em longo prazo revelou que o rastreamento à procura de ILTB e a profilaxia primária antes do tratamento com anti‐TNF foram eficazes em um país de alto risco para TB e o TT foi o parâmetro mais sensível para identificar esses pacientes.AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate, in an endemic country, the long‐term efficacy of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening and primary prophylaxis in patients with JIA receiving TNF blockers.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort that included JIA patients eligible to anti‐TNF therapy. Patients were screened for LTBI prior to anti‐TNF using tuberculin skin test (TST), chest X‐ray and history of exposure to TB. Subjects were regularly followed at 2‐month intervals.ResultsSixty‐nine JIA patients with current age of 17.4±5.8 years, mean disease duration of 5.0±4.9 years were included. Forty‐seven patients received a single anti‐TNF, while 22 patients switched to another anti‐TNF once or twice: 57 were treated with etanercepte, 33 patients with adalimumab and 3 infliximab. LTBI screening was positive in three patients: one had TST‐positive and history of TB exposure and two had solely TST‐positive. No active TB was diagnosed during the study period (median of follow‐up was 3.8 years).ConclusionLong‐term evaluation revealed that LTBI screening and primary prophylaxis before anti‐TNF treatment was effective in a high‐risk country and TST was the most sensitive parameter to identify these patients

A single session of aerobic exercise reduces systolic blood pressure at rest and in response to stress in women with rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension (HT). A single session of aerobic exercise may reduce blood pressure (BP) in different clinical groups; however, little is known about the acute effects of exercise on BP in RA patients. This is a randomized controlled crossover study that assessed the effects of a single session of aerobic exercise on resting BP, on BP responses to stressful stimuli, and on 24-h BP in women with RA and HT. Twenty women with RA and HT (53 ± 10 years) undertook sessions of 30-min treadmill exercise (50% VO2max) or control (no exercise) in a crossover fashion. Before and after the sessions, BP was measured at rest, and in response to the Stroop-Color Word Test (SCWT), the Cold Pressor Test (CPT), and an isometric handgrip test. After the sessions, participants were also fitted with an ambulatory BP monitor for the assessment of 24-h BP. A single session of exercise reduced resting systolic BP (SBP) (-5 ± 9 mmHg; p < 0.05), and reduced SBP response to the SCWT (-7 ± 14 mmHg; p < 0.05), and to the CPT (-5 ± 11 mmHg; p < 0.05). Exercise did not reduce resting diastolic BP (DBP), BP responses to the isometric handgrip test or 24-h BP. In conclusion, a single session of aerobic exercise reduced SBP at rest and in response to stressful stimuli in hypertensive women with RA. These results support the use of exercise as a strategy for controlling HT and, hence, reducing cardiovascular risk in women with RA.Clinical Trial Registration: This study registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trials ( https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-867k9g ) at 12/13/2019

Latent tuberculosis screening before anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients from an endemic area

Recomendações para rastreamento de Tuberculoses Latente (TBL) em pacientes que receberão tratamento com antagonistas do TNF-alfa (anti- TNF) permanecem controversas para regiões endêmicas Objetivo: Esse estudo buscou demonstrar a eficácia em longo prazo do rastreamento e tratamento da TBL em pacientes portadores de Artrite Reumatoide (AR) recebendo anti-TNF. Métodos: 202 pacientes com AR, antes do início do anti-TNF, foram rastreados para TBL por meio do teste tuberculínico (TT), Radiografia de tórax (RX) e história de prévia de exposição à tuberculose (EXP). Todos os pacientes foram seguidos com intervalos de um a três meses. Resultados: 85 pacientes (42%) foram tratados com um único agente anti-TNF e 117 pacientes (58%) mudaram de anti-TNF uma ou duas vezes. O rastreamento para TBL foi positivo em 66 pacientes, 44 apresentaram TT positivo, 23 apresentavam história de exposição (EXP), e 14, alterações radiográficas (RX). EXP isoladamente foi responsável por 14 diagnósticos em pacientes TT negativos. Pacientes portadores de TBL receberam tratamento com Isoniazida (300 mg/dia por seis meses) e nenhum deles desenvolveu TB. Durante os seguimentos, o TT foi repetido em 51 pacientes. A conversão foi observada em cinco: três foram diagnosticados com TBL e dois com TB ativa (14 e 36 meses após receber terapia anti-TNF), sugerindo nova exposição a TB. Conclusão: O rastreamento e tratamento da TBL antes do início da terapia com anti-TNF é efetiva em regiões endêmicas, e reforça a relevância da história de contato com TB para o diagnóstico da TBL em pacientes com ARRecommendations for screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients eligible for anti-TNF agents remain unclear in endemic regions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of LTBI screening/treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving TNF blockers. Design: 202 RA patients were screened for LTBI prior to receiving anti-TNF treatment, by means of tuberculin skin test (TST), chest radiography (X-Ray), and history of tuberculosis exposure (EXP). All subjects were regularly followed at 1- to 3-month intervals. Results: Eighty-five patients (42%) were treated with a single anti-TNF agent, and 117 patients (58%) switched anti-TNF agents once or twice. LTBI screening was positive in 66 patients, 44 presented positive TST, 23 had a history of EXP, and 14, abnormal X-Ray. Exposure alone accounted for LTBI diagnosis in 14 patients with negative TSTs. LTBI patients were treated with Isoniazid (300 mg/day during six months) and none developed TB. During follow up, TST was repeated in 51 patients. Conversion was observed in five: three were diagnosed with LTBI and two with active TB (14 and 36 months after receiving anti-TNF therapy, suggesting new TB exposure). Conclusion: LTBI screening and treatment prior to anti-TNF treatment is effective in endemic areas and reinforces the relevance of contact history for diagnosing LTBI in RA patient

Linfadenopatia e lúpus eritematoso sistêmico

A linfadenopatia no lúpus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) é um achado benigno encontrado comumente em jovens, com atividade cutânea e sintomas constitucionais, apresentando boa resposta à corticoterapia. O achado mais frequente à biópsia é a hiperplasia folicular reacional. Relatamos o caso de um paciente que, desde os 13 anos de idade, apresentava surtos recorrentes de linfadenopatia, acompanhados de hepatoesplenomegalia, febre e emagrecimento. Na evolução, apareceram artrite, hipertensão arterial, proteinúria, miocardiopatia e neuropatia periférica. Foi amplamente investigado sem esclarecimento diagnóstico e submetido a tratamento empírico de tuberculose. Somente após cinco anos de evolução firmou-se o diagnóstico de LES e recebeu tratamento específico. O diagnóstico precoce nestes casos é difícil, pois a investigação laboratorial pode ainda não demonstrar presença de autoanticorpos ou hipocomplementemia

Latent tuberculosis infection screening in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients preceding anti-TNF therapy in a tuberculosis high-risk country

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate, in an endemic country, the long-term efficacy of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening and primary prophylaxis in patients with JIA receiving TNF blockers. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort that included JIA patients eligible to anti-TNF therapy. Patients were screened for LTBI prior to anti-TNF using tuberculin skin test (TST), chest X-ray and history of exposure to TB. Subjects were regularly followed at 2-month intervals. Results: Sixty-nine JIA patients with current age of 17.4 ± 5.8 years, mean disease duration of 5.0 ± 4.9 years were included. Forty-seven patients received a single anti-TNF, while 22 patients switched to another anti-TNF once or twice: 57 were treated with etanercepte, 33 patients with adalimumab and 3 infliximab. LTBI screening was positive in three patients: one had TST-positive and history of TB exposure and two had solely TST-positive. No active TB was diagnosed during the study period (median of follow-up was 3.8 years). Conclusion: Long-term evaluation revealed that LTBI screening and primary prophylaxis before anti-TNF treatment was effective in a high-risk country and TST was the most sensitive parameter to identify these patients

Do it fast! Early access to specialized care improved long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: data from the REAL multicenter observational study

Abstract Background Early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) offers an opportunity for better treatment outcomes. In real-life settings, grasping this opportunity might depend on access to specialized care. We evaluated the effects of early versus late assessment by the rheumatologist on the diagnosis, treatment initiation and long-term outcomes of RA under real-life conditions. Methods Adults meeting the ACR/EULAR (2010) or ARA (1987) criteria for RA were included. Structured interviews were conducted. The specialized assessment was deemed “early” when the rheumatologist was the first or second physician consulted after symptoms onset, and “late” when performed afterwards. Delays in RA diagnosis and treatment were inquired. Disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and physical function (HAQ-DI) were evaluated. Student’s t, Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared and correlation tests, and multiple linear regression were performed. For sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched subsample of early- vs. late-assessed participants was derived based on logistic regression. The study received ethical approval; all participants signed informed consent. Results We included 1057 participants (89.4% female, 56.5% white); mean (SD) age: 56.9 (11.5) years; disease duration: 173.1 (114.5) months. Median (IQR) delays from symptoms onset to both RA diagnosis and initial treatment coincided: 12 (6–36) months, with no significant delay between diagnosis and treatment. Most participants (64.6%) first sought a general practitioner. Notwithstanding, 80.7% had the diagnosis established only by the rheumatologist. Only a minority (28.7%) attained early RA treatment (≤ 6 months of symptoms). Diagnostic and treatment delays were strongly correlated (rho 0.816; p < 0.001). The chances of missing early treatment more than doubled when the assessment by the rheumatologist was belated (OR 2.77; 95% CI: 1.93, 3.97). After long disease duration, late-assessed participants still presented lower chances of remission/low disease activity (OR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.99), while the early-assessed ones showed better DAS28-CRP and HAQ-DI scores (difference in means [95% CI]: -0.25 [-0.46, -0.04] and − 0.196 [-0.306, -0.087] respectively). The results in the propensity-score matched subsample confirmed those observed in the original (whole) sample. Conclusions Early diagnosis and treatment initiation in patients with RA was critically dependent on early access to the rheumatologist; late specialized assessment was associated with worse long-term clinical outcomes

Discordance between the patient's and physician's global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: Data from the REAL study-Brazil.

BACKGROUND:Discordance between patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) has been described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Understanding the reasons for this discrepancy is important in the context of treat-to-target treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE:To assess the determinants of PtGA and PhGA and factors associated with discordance between them. METHODS:The REAL study included RA patients from Brazilian public health centers. Clinical, laboratory and outcomes measures were collected. PtGA and the PhGA were rated on a visual analog scale and analyzed. Three groups were defined: no discordance (difference between PtGA and PhGA within 3 cm), positive discordance (PtGA exceeding PhGA by >3 cm), and negative discordance (PtGA less than PhGA by >3 cm). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify determinants of PtGA and PhGA and their discordance. RESULTS:1115 patients (89,4% female, mean age 56.7y and median disease duration of 12.7y) were enrolled. Two factors were associated with PtGA in the final multivariate model: one point increase in the pain scale leads to an increase of 0.62 in PtGA; one point increase in HAQ increases by 9,25 points the PtGA. The factors associated with PhGA were pain scale, number of tender and swollen joints (NTJ and NSJ), positive RF, ESR, HAQ-DI and use of corticosteroids. Discordance between patient and physician was found in 30.52%: positive discordance in 24.6% and negative discordance in 5.92%. An increase of one point in the NSJ was associated with a 12% increase in the chance of negative discordance. The chance of positive discordance increased by 90% and 2% for each unit increased in HAQ-DI and pain scale respectively. Finally, the chance of positive discordance decreased by 3% for each point increased in NTJ and by 15% for each point increased in NSJ. CONCLUSION:In one-third of the assessments, there was disagreement between PtGA and PhGA (a positive discordance was found in 80% of them). Pain and function were determinants for patients to estimate disease activity, while swollen joints was the main factor related to a worse physician's evaluation. These data show how different can be the perspectives of patients and assistants