Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: on propositions addressing the actor or the activity

More often than not, the source of DNA traces found at a crime scene is not disputed, but the activity or timing of events that resulted in their transfer is. As a consequence, practitioners are increasingly asked to assign a value to DNA evidence given propositions about activities provided by prosecution and defense counsel. Given that the dispute concerns the nature of the activity that took place or the identity of the actor that carried out the activity, several factors will determine how to formulate the propositions. Determining factors are (1) whether defense claims the crime never took place, (2) whether defense claims someone other than the accused (either an unknown individual or a known person) performed the criminal activity, and (3) whether it is claimed and disputed that the suspect performed an alternative, legitimate activity or has a relation to the victim, the object, or the scene of crime that implies a legitimate interaction. Addressing such propositions using Bayesian networks, we demonstrate the effects of the various proposition sets on the evaluation of the evidence.Criminal Justice: Legitimacy, accountability, and effectivit

Effect of Terbinafine on the Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporin in Humans

Cyclosporin is largely metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, and azole drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 may precipitate cyclosporin toxicity. The allylamine terbinafine binds to a small subfraction of hepatic cytochrome P450 in type I fashion, and has no effect upon hepatic metabolism of cyclosporin in vitro. The purpose of this study was to determine whether oral terbinafine alters the pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporin in vivo.Twenty male volunteers (age 19–44 years), were randomly allocated to two groups. The first group received three single oral doses of cyclosporin 300mg at intervals of 21 d. The second and third doses of cyclosporin were preceded by a 6-d course of oral terbinafine 250mg each morning. A further 250mg of terbinafine was taken with the second and third doses of cyclosporin. Blood levels of cyclosporin and terbinafine were monitored for 36h after each dose. The second group received a 7-d course of terbinafine 250mg each morning. On the seventh day a single dose of cyclosporin 300mg was taken together with the terbinafine. Blood levels of both cyclosporin and terbinafine were monitored for 36kh. Two further single doses of cyclosporin 300mg were given at intervals of 2 weeks and the cyclosporin levels again monitored. In both groups each cyclosporin dose was preceded by an 8-h fast.The mean peak blood concentration of cyclosporin when taken alone was 958 μg/I, and 822 when taken with terbinafine. The mean area under the curve for cyclosporin was 4207 μg/l/h when taken alone and 3665 when taken with terbinafine. The mean absorption half-life for cyclosporin when taken alone was 0.29 h, and 0.33 when taken with terbinafine. The mean time of maximum concentration and elimination half-life of cyclosporin were unaltered by terbinafine. The results suggest that terbinafine is likely to prove a safe systemic anti-fungal treatment for patients who are taking cyclosporin

Use of SMS texts for facilitating access to online alcohol interventions: a feasibility study

A41 Use of SMS texts for facilitating access to online alcohol interventions: a feasibility study In: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 2017, 12(Suppl 1): A4

Scenario’s, hypothesen, aannamen en context-informatie; wat bedoelt de deskundige eigenlijk?

Criminal Justice: Legitimacy, accountability, and effectivit

Day hospital versus intensive out-patient mentalisation-based treatment for borderline personality disorder:Multicentre randomised clinical trial

Background Two types of mentalisation-based treatment (MBT) have been developed and empirically evaluated for borderline personality disorder (BPD): day hospital MBT (MBT-DH) and intensive out-patient MBT (MBT-IOP). No trial has yet compared their efficacy.Aims To compare the efficacy of MBT-DH and MBT-IOP 18 months after start of treatment. MBT-DH was hypothesised to be superior to MBT-IOP because of its higher treatment intensity.Method In a multicentre randomised controlled trial (Nederlands Trial Register: NTR2292) conducted at three sites in the Netherlands, patients with BPD were randomly assigned to MBT-DH (n = 70) or MBT-IOP (n = 44). The primary outcome was symptom severity (Brief Symptom Inventory). Secondary outcome measures included borderline symptomatology, personality functioning, interpersonal functioning, quality of life and self-harm. Patients were assessed every 6 months from baseline to 18 months after start of treatment. Data were analysed using multilevel modelling based on intention-to-treat principles.Results Significant improvements were found on all outcome measures, with moderate to very large effect sizes for both groups. MBT-DH was not superior to MBT-IOP on the primary outcome measure, but MBT-DH showed a clear tendency towards superiority on secondary outcomes.Conclusions Although MBT-DH was not superior to MBT-IOP on the primary outcome measure despite its greater treatment intensity, MBT-DH showed a tendency to be more effective on secondary outcomes, particularly in terms of relational functioning. Patients receiving MBT-DH and MBT-IOP, thus, seem to follow different trajectories of change, which may have important implications for clinical decision-making. Longer-term follow-up and cost-effectiveness considerations may ultimately determine the optimal intensity of specialised treatments such as MBT for patients with BPD