Influence on effectiveness of early treatment with anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Purpose. To evaluate the association between starting early treatment with anti-TNF and effectiveness as well as the possibility of applying therapeutic spacing in daily practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Observational, retrospective study conducted in two universitary hospitals in Spain. RA patients who received the first anti-TNF (adalimumab: ADA, etanercept: ETN or infliximab: IFX) during the study period (October 2006-2010) were included. Demographic data, time since diagnosis, disease activity (DAS28-ESR) and anti-TNF dosage were analyzed. Therapeutic objective was defined as DAS28<2.6. Also the response related to criteria of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) was evaluated. Therapeutic spacing was defined as the use of a lower dose or a higher interval according to label doses. The main endpoint was to assess the association between the effectiveness and the moment when the anti-TNF therapy begins. The secondary target was to evaluate the association between RA activity at the beginning of treatment with anti-TNF and dose used. Results. 82 patients were included. The prescription profile was: ADA (48.8%), ETN (31.7%) and IFX (19.5%). 71.4% of patients treated with anti-TNF during the first year since diagnosis, 57.1% of those who started after 1-5 years and 30.6% of patients who started after 5 years were in remission when the study ended. De-escalation strategy was performed in 25.6% of patients: ETN (38.5%), ADA (20.0%) and IFX (18.8%). The patients treated with a higher dose according to label doses were: IFX (81%), ADA, (12.5%) and ETN (7.7%). Conclusions. Results suggest that early treatment with anti-TNF can achieve a higher percentage of remissions. Therapeutic spacing is established as a strategy that improves the efficiency in those patients in remission, being the ETN the anti-TNF most susceptible for spacing, although a relation between the early beginning with anti-TNF and the used dose was not found.Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plat

Influence on effectiveness of early treatment with anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Purpose. To evaluate the association between starting early treatment with anti-TNF and effectiveness as well as the possibility of applying therapeutic spacing in daily practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Observational, retrospective study conducted in two universitary hospitals in Spain. RA patients who received the first anti-TNF (adalimumab: ADA, etanercept: ETN or infliximab: IFX) during the study period (October 2006-2010) were included. Demographic data, time since diagnosis, disease activity (DAS28-ESR) and anti-TNF dosage were analyzed. Therapeutic objective was defined as DAS28<2.6. Also the response related to criteria of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) was evaluated. Therapeutic spacing was defined as the use of a lower dose or a higher interval according to label doses. The main endpoint was to assess the association between the effectiveness and the moment when the anti-TNF therapy begins. The secondary target was to evaluate the association between RA activity at the beginning of treatment with anti-TNF and dose used. Results. 82 patients were included. The prescription profile was: ADA (48.8%), ETN (31.7%) and IFX (19.5%). 71.4% of patients treated with anti-TNF during the first year since diagnosis, 57.1% of those who started after 1-5 years and 30.6% of patients who started after 5 years were in remission when the study ended. De-escalation strategy was performed in 25.6% of patients: ETN (38.5%), ADA (20.0%) and IFX (18.8%). The patients treated with a higher dose according to label doses were: IFX (81%), ADA, (12.5%) and ETN (7.7%). Conclusions. Results suggest that early treatment with anti-TNF can achieve a higher percentage of remissions. Therapeutic spacing is established as a strategy that improves the efficiency in those patients in remission, being the ETN the anti-TNF most susceptible for spacing, although a relation between the early beginning with anti-TNF and the used dose was not found.Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plat

Evolution of adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a spanish hospital during 2001, 2005 and 2008

The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain) over the last 8 years and determine the variables associated with the complexity of treatment and suboptimal adherence. An observational, retrospective method was used to measure adherence during the first 6 months of HAART in 3 cohorts: 2001 cohort (n = 90), 2005 cohort (n = 98), and 2008 cohort (n = 110). The adherence rate was determined using 2 methods: Pharmacy Department dispensation records and virologic response data. The evolution of the complexity of treatment and its influence on the adherence rate was analyzed by logistic regression. Adherence to HAART increased progressively from 45.6 % in 2001 to 56.1 % in 2005 and 77.3 % in 2008. Statistically significant differences were only observed between cohorts in 2005 and 2008. The average daily pill burden was 7, 4, and 4.5 tablets, respectively. The percentage of patients on twice-daily regimens decreased from 93.3 % in 2001 to 63.6 % in 2008, with a parallel increase in once-daily regimens. The proportion of patients with dietary restrictions decreased from 24.4 % to 3.6 %. A statistically significant association was found between the number of medication units per day and adherence and between frequency of administration and adherence. Adherence to HAART has improved significantly in the last 8 years. While the complexity of the treatment was significantly reduced in 2005, the largest increase in adherence occurred in the last cohort, which shows the influence of factors other than treatment simplification.Colegio de Farmacéuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aire

Reseñas iberoamericanas

Reseñas iberoamericana

Reseñas iberoamericanas

Iberoamerican reviewsReseñas iberoamericana

Soy Niña

Este libro pretende contribuir al reencuentro de la educación con esas finalidades que verdaderamente importan a una niña o un niño: ser feliz, jugar, vivir juntos y (no) aprender. Para ello hemos puesto el arte, nuestras experiencias y el saber acumulado al servicio del disfrute, el cuestionamiento, el análisis crítico y la construcción común de un presente deseable. Un texto colaborativo coordinado por Ignacio Calderón Almendros y realizado por alumnado de Educación y Cambio Social en el Grado en Educación Infantil de la Universidad de Málaga

Influence on effectiveness of early treatment with anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Purpose. To evaluate the association between starting early treatment with anti-TNF and effectiveness as well as the possibility of applying therapeutic spacing in daily practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. Observational, retrospective study conducted in two universitary hospitals in Spain. RA patients who received the first anti-TNF (adalimumab: ADA, etanercept: ETN or infliximab: IFX) during the study period (October 2006-2010) were included. Demographic data, time since diagnosis, disease activity (DAS28-ESR) and anti-TNF dosage were analyzed. Therapeutic objective was defined as DAS28<2.6. Also the response related to criteria of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) was evaluated. Therapeutic spacing was defined as the use of a lower dose or a higher interval according to label doses. The main endpoint was to assess the association between the effectiveness and the moment when the anti-TNF therapy begins. The secondary target was to evaluate the association between RA activity at the beginning of treatment with anti-TNF and dose used. Results. 82 patients were included. The prescription profile was: ADA (48.8%), ETN (31.7%) and IFX (19.5%). 71.4% of patients treated with anti-TNF during the first year since diagnosis, 57.1% of those who started after 1-5 years and 30.6% of patients who started after 5 years were in remission when the study ended. De-escalation strategy was performed in 25.6% of patients: ETN (38.5%), ADA (20.0%) and IFX (18.8%). The patients treated with a higher dose according to label doses were: IFX (81%), ADA, (12.5%) and ETN (7.7%). Conclusions. Results suggest that early treatment with anti-TNF can achieve a higher percentage of remissions. Therapeutic spacing is established as a strategy that improves the efficiency in those patients in remission, being the ETN the anti-TNF most susceptible for spacing, although a relation between the early beginning with anti-TNF and the used dose was not found.Fil: Escudero-Vilaplana, Vicente. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Ramírez-Herraiz, Esther. La Princesa University Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Trovato-López, Nicolás. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Pharmacy Department; España. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Institute for Health Research; EspañaFil: Alañón-Plaza, Estefania. La Princesa University Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Bellini, Maria Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata "Prof. Dr. Rodolfo R. Brenner". Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de La Plata "Prof. Dr. Rodolfo R. Brenner"; Argentina. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Pharmacy Department; España. La Princesa University Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Herranz-Alonso, Ana. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Institute for Health Research; España. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Bellón-Cano, José María. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Institute for Health Research; EspañaFil: Morell-Baladrón, Alberto. La Princesa University Hospital. Pharmacy Department; EspañaFil: Sanjurjo-Sáez, María. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Pharmacy Department; España. Gregorio Marañon University General Hospital. Institute for Health Research; Españ

Influence of Pneumonia on the Survival of Patients with COPD

Background: Pneumonia is a frequent infection. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can present with comorbidities, including pneumonia. It is known that COPD worsens the evolution of pneumonia, but few studies describe the impact of pneumonia on COPD evolution. This study analyzes the influence of pneumonia on the survival of COPD patients. Methods: Observational study of a cohort of 273 patients with COPD who attended spirometry in 2011, with a prospective follow-up of six years. Patients were divided into two groups according to their acquisition of pneumonia during follow-up. The difference in survival between the two groups was analyzed. Results: Survival was lower in the group with pneumonia compared with that without pneumonia (p = 0.000), both globally and after stratification by COPD phenotype. Pneumonia (Hazard Ratio -HR- 2.65; 95% Confidence Interval -CI- 1.57&ndash;4.48), advanced age (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03&ndash;1.09), and high Charlson index (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17&ndash;1.47) were identified as risk factors independently associated with mortality, while a high body mass index (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87&ndash;0.96) was identified as a protective factor. Conclusions: Pneumonia is associated with worse prognosis in COPD patients. It is important to take into account this comorbidity for a comprehensive care of these patients

Differences in Survival of Patients With COPD According to the New GesEPOC 2021 Classification of Phenotypes

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory pathology with high prevalence, morbidity and mortality. The Spanish COPD guideline (GesEPOC) recommends individualizing treatment according to phenotypes. The phenotype classification was updated in 2021. This study aimed to determine the survival of patients by this new classification and compare the predictive capacity of mortality compared to the previous version. Methods: This observational study of COPD patients involved prospective follow-up for 6 years. Demographic and clinical data were collected at the beginning and evolutionary data at the end of the study. Patients were classified according to GesEPOC 2017 and GesEPOC 2021. Univariate survival analysis and multivariate analysis identified mortality risk factors. Results: Of the 273 patients, 243 (89.0%) were male. Ninety-three patients (34.1%) died during follow-up. Regarding phenotypes, 190 patients (69.6%) were non-exacerbators, 69 (25.3%) belonged to the non-eosinophilic exacerbator phenotype and 14 (5.1%) were of the eosinophilic exacerbator phenotype. Compared with non-exacerbator patients, those with the non-eosinophilic exacerbator phenotype had lower survival (p = 0.009). Risk factors independently associated with mortality were older age (p < 0.001), non-eosinophilic exacerbator phenotype (p = 0.017) and a high Charlson index score (p < 0.001). The new classification presented a worse ability to predict mortality than the previous version (area under the curve 0.632 vs 0.566, p = 0.018). Conclusion: Patients with the non-eosinophilic exacerbator phenotype had worse prognoses. This phenotype, advanced age and high comorbidity were mortality risk factors. The GesEPOC 2021 classification predicts mortality worse than the 2017 version. These data must be considered for more individualized management of COPD patients. Resumen: Introducción: La enfermedad obstructiva crónica (EPOC) es una patología respiratoria con elevada prevalencia y alta morbimortalidad. La guía española de la EPOC (GesEPOC) recomienda individualizar el tratamiento según fenotipos. En su última actualización en 2021, se ha actualizado la clasificación de fenotipos. Se realiza este estudio para conocer la supervivencia de los pacientes sobre esta nueva clasificación y para comparar la capacidad predictiva de mortalidad con respecto a la versión previa. Métodos: Estudio observacional de pacientes con EPOC con un seguimiento prospectivo durante 6 años. Se recogieron datos demográficos y clínicos al inicio y datos evolutivos al final del estudio. Se clasificó a los pacientes según GesEPOC 2017 y GesEPOC 2021. Se realizó un análisis univariante de supervivencia y un análisis multivariante para identificar factores de riesgo de mortalidad. Resultados: Del los 273 pacientes, 243 (89,0%) eran varones. Fallecieron 93 sujetos (34,1%) durante el seguimiento. En cuanto a los fenotipos, 190 pacientes (69,6%) eran no agudizadores, 69 (25,3%) pertenecían al fenotipo agudizador no eosinofílico, y 14 (5,1%) eran del fenotipo agudizador eosinofílico. Comparando con los enfermos no agudizadores, los del fenotipo agudizador no eosinofílico tuvieron una menor supervivencia (p = 0,009). Los factores de riesgo independientemente asociados a la mortalidad fueron la edad avanzada (p < 0,001), el fenotipo agudizador no eosinofílico (p = 0,017) y una puntuación elevada en el índice de Charlson (p < 0,001). La nueva clasificación presentó una peor capacidad para predecir mortalidad en comparación con la versión previa (área bajo curva 0,632 vs 0,566, p = 0,018). Conclusión: Los pacientes del fenotipo agudizador no eosinofílico tenían peor pronóstico. Este fenotipo, junto con la edad avanzada y la elevada comorbilidad, fueron factores de riesgo de mortalidad. La clasificación GesEPOC 2021 predice peor la mortalidad con respecto a la versión de 2017. Es importante tener estos datos en cuenta para ofrecer un manejo más individualizado a los pacientes con EPOC