Factors behind the success story of under-five stunting in Peru: a district ecological multilevel analysis

Background: Stunting prevalence in children less than 5 years has remained stagnated in Peru from 1992 to 2007, with a rapid reduction thereafter. We aimed to assess the role of different predictors on stunting reduction over time and across departments, from 2000 to 2012. Methods: We used various secondary data sources to describe time trends of stunting and of possible predictors that included distal to proximal determinants. We determined a ranking of departments by annual change of stunting and of different predictors. To account for variation over time and across departments, we used an ecological hierarchical approach based on a multilevel mixed-effects regression model, considering stunting as the outcome. Our unit of analysis was one department-year. Results: Stunting followed a decreasing trend in all departments, with differing slopes. The reduction pace was higher from 2007–2008 onwards. The departments with the highest annual stunting reduction were Cusco (−2.31%), Amazonas (−1.57%), Puno (−1.54%), Huanuco (−1.52%), and Ancash (−1.44). Those with the lowest reduction were Ica (−0.67%), Ucayali (−0.64%), Tumbes (−0.45%), Lima (−0.37%), and Tacna (−0.31%). Amazon and Andean departments, with the highest baseline poverty rates and concentrating the highest rural populations, showed the highest stunting reduction. In the multilevel analysis, when accounting for confounding, social determinants seemed to be the most important factors influencing annual stunting reduction, with significant variation between departments. Conclusions: Stunting reduction may be explained by the adoption of anti-poverty policies and sustained implementation of equitable crosscutting interventions, with focus on poorest areas. Inclusion of quality indicators for reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health interventions may enable further analyses to show the influence of these factors. After a long stagnation period, Peru reduced dramatically its national and departmental stunting prevalence, thanks to a combination of social determinants and crosscutting factors. This experience offers useful lessons to other countries trying to improve their children’s nutrition.Revisión por pare

Are children in female-headed households at a disadvantage? An analysis of immunization coverage and stunting prevalence : in 95 low- and middle-income countries

Studies of inequalities in child health have given limited attention to household structure and headship. The few existing reports on child outcomes in male and female-headed households have produced inconsistent results. The aim of our analyses was to provide a global view of the influence of sex of the household head on child health in cross-sectional surveys from up to 95 LMICs. Studied outcomes were full immunization coverage in children aged 12–23 months and stunting prevalence in under-five children. We analyzed the most recent nationally-representative surveys for each country (since 2010) with available data. After initial exploratory analyses, we focused on three types of households: a) male-headed household (MHH) comprised 73.1% of all households in the pooled analyses; b) female Headed Household (FHH) with at least one adult male represented 9.8% of households; and c) FHH without an adult male accounted for 15.0% of households. Our analyses also included the following covariates: wealth index, education of the child’s mother and urban/rural residence. Meta-analytic approaches were used to calculate pooled effects across the countries with MHH as the reference category. Regarding full immunization, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.01) and that for FHH (no male) was 0.99 (0.97; 1.02). For stunting prevalence, the pooled prevalence ratio for FHH (any male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02) and for FHH (no male) was 1.00 (0.98; 1.02). Adjustment for covariates did not lead to any noteworthy change in the results. No particular patterns were found among different world regions. A few countries presented significant inequalities with different directions of association, indicating the diversity of FHH and how complex the meaning and measurement of household headship may be. Further research is warranted to understand context, examine mediating factors, and exploring alternative definitions of household headship in countries with some association.The International Development Research Centre, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and ABRASCO (Associacao Brasileira de Saude Coletiva).https://www.elsevier.com/locate/ssmphhj2021Sociolog

The role of MIR9-2 in shared susceptibility of psychiatric disorders during childhood : a population-based birth cohort study

Background: It has been suggested that microRNAs (miRNAs; short non-protein-coding RNA molecules that mediate post-transcriptional regulation), including mir-9 and mir-34 families, are important for brain development. Current data suggest that mir-9 and mir-34 may have shared effects across psychiatric disorders. This study aims to explore the role of genetic polymorphisms in the MIR9-2 (rs4916723) and MIR34B/C (rs4938723) genes on the susceptibility of psychiatric disorders in children from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. Methods: Psychiatric disorders were assessed in 3585 individuals using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), criteria through the application of standard semi-structured interviews (using the Development and Well-Being Assessment, DAWBA) at the six-years-of-age follow-up. The outcome was defined as the presence of any mental disorder. We also considered two broad groups of internalizing and externalizing disorders to further investigate the role of these variants in mental health. Results: We observed an association between rs4916723 (MIR9-2) and the presence of any psychiatric disorder (odds ratios (OR) = 0.820; 95% CI = 0.7130–0.944; p = 0.006) and a suggestive effect on internalizing disorders (OR = 0.830; 95% CI = 0.698–0.987; p = 0.035). rs4938723 (MIR34B/C) was not associated with any evaluated outcome. Conclusion: The study suggests that MIR9-2 may have an important role on a broad susceptibility for psychiatric disorders and may be important mainly for internalization problems

Peso medio al nacer entre recién nacidos a término : tendencia, magnitud y factores asociados

A trend towards increasing birth weight has been shown, but factors that explain these trends have not been elucidated. The objectives of this study were to evaluate changes in mean birth weight of term newborns and to identify factors associated with them. All cohorts are population-based studies in which random samples of births (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State in 1978/1979, 1994 and 2010; Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul State in 1982, 1993 and 2004; and São Luís, Maranhão State in 1997/1998 and 2010, Brazil). A total of 32,147 full-term, singleton live births were included. Mean birth weight reduced in the first study period (-89.1g in Ribeirão Preto from 1978/1979 to 1994, and -27.7g in Pelotas from 1982 to 1993) and increased +30.2g in Ribeirão Preto from 1994 to 2010 and +24.7g in São Luís from 1997 to 2010. In the first period, in Ribeirão Preto, mean birth weight reduction was steeper among mothers with high school education and among those born 39-41 weeks. In the second period, the increase in mean birth weight was steeper among mothers with low schooling in Ribeirão Preto and São Luís, females and those born 37-38 weeks in Ribeirão Preto and cesarean section in São Luís. Birth weight decreased in the first study period then increased thereafter. The variables that seem to have been able to explain these changes varied over time.Existem evidências de uma tendência de aumento do peso ao nascer, mas pouco se sabe sobre os fatores que explicam essa tendência. Avaliar as mudanças na média de peso ao nascer e identificar os fatores associados. Foram incluídas todas as coortes de base populacional com amostras aleatórias de nascimentos (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo em 1978/1979, 1994 e 2010; Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul em 1982, 1993 e 2004; São Luís, Maranhão em 1997/1998 e 2010, Brasil). Foi incluído um total de 32.147 nascidos vivos a termo, de feto único. A média de peso ao nascer diminuiu no primeiro período estudado (-89,1g entre 1978/1979 e 1994 em Ribeirão Preto e -27,7g entre 1982 e 1993 em Pelotas) e aumentou no segundo período, +30,2g entre 1994 e 2010 em Ribeirão Preto e +24,7g entre 1997 e 2010 em São Luís. No primeiro período, em Ribeirão Preto, a redução na média de peso ao nascer foi maior entre mães com escolaridade mais alta e crianças nascidas com 39-41 semanas de idade gestacional. No segundo período, o aumento na média de peso ao nascer foi maior entre mães com escolaridade mais baixa em Ribeirão Preto e São Luís, crianças do sexo feminino e nascidas com 37-38 semanas em Ribeirão Preto e crianças nascidas de cesárea em São Luís. O peso ao nascer diminuiu no primeiro período e aumentou desde então. As variáveis que parecem explicar essas mudanças variaram ao longo do tempo.Se ha mostrado una tendencia de aumento de peso al nacer, pero los factores que explican esta tendencia todavía no han sido elucidados. Evaluar los cambios en el peso medio al nacer de los recién nacidos a término e identificar factores asociados. Se trata de un estudio de todas las cohortes basadas en población, donde existe una muestra aleatoria simple de nacimientos (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo en 1978/1979, 1994 y 2010; Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul en 1982, 1993 y 2004; y São Luís, Maranhão en 1997/1998 y 2010, Brasil). Se incluyeron un total de 32.147 de nacimientos a término completo con embarazo de un único feto. El peso medio al nacer se redujo en el primer estudio del período (-89,1g en Ribeirão Preto desde 1978/1979 a 1994 y -27,7g en Pelotas desde 1982 a 1993) y se incrementó +30,2g en Ribeirão Preto desde 1994 a 2010 y +24.7g en São Luís desde 1997 a 2010. En el primer periodo, en Ribeirão Preto, la reducción del peso medio al nacer fue más pronunciada entre madres con una escolarización más alta y entre aquellos nacidos con 39-41 semanas. En el segundo período, el incremento en el peso medio al nacer fue más pronunciado entre las madres con una escolarización más baja en Ribeirão Preto y São Luís, mujeres y aquellos que nacieron con 37-38 semanas en Ribeirão Preto y en el área de cesáreas en São Luís. Disminuyó el peso al nacer durante el primer período de estudio y se vio incrementado después. Las variables que parecen capaces de explicar estos cambios varían a lo largo del tiempo

Changes in infant and neonatal mortality and associated factors in eight cohorts from three Brazilian cities

Stillbirth (SBR), perinatal (PMR), neonatal (NMR) and infant mortality rates (IMR) are declining in Brazil and the factors associated with these falls are still being investigated. The objective of the present study was to assess changes in SBR, PMR, NMR and IMR over time and to determine the factors associated with changes in NMR and IMR in eight Brazilian cohorts. All cohorts are population-based (Ribeirão Preto in 1978/79, 1994 and 2010; Pelotas in 1982, 1993 and 2004; and São Luís in 1997/98 and 2010). Were included data on 41440 children. All indicators were decreased, except in the city of Pelotas, from 1993 to 2004, and except SBR in São Luís. Sociodemographic variables seem to be able to explain reductions of NMR and IMR in Ribeirão Preto, from 1978/79 to 1994, and in São Luís. In Ribeirão Preto, from 1994 to 2010 declines in NMR and IMR seem to be explained by reductions in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Newborn’s gestational age had diminished in all cohorts, preventing even greater reductions of NMR and IMR. Improved sociodemographic variables and reduction of IUGR, seem to be able to explain part of the decrease observed. NMR and IMR could have been reduced even more, were it not for the worsening in gestational age distribution

Is intrauterine exposure to acetaminophen associated with emotional and hyperactivity problems during childhood? : findings from the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort

Background: Longitudinal studies have consistently reported that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen can to lead to an increased risk of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder during childhood. This study aimed to investigate the association between intrauterine exposure to acetaminophen and the presence of emotional and behavioral problems at the ages of 6 and 11 years in a low-middle income country. Methods: We performed a prospective longitudinal population-based study using data from the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort. From the 4231 initial cohort participants, 3722 and 3566 children were assessed at 6 and 11 years of age, respectively. The outcomes were assessed using the parent version of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The cut-off points established for the Brazilian population were used to categorize the outcomes. Crude and adjusted odds ratio were obtained through logistic regression. Results: Acetaminophen was used by 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.1–28.9) of the mothers at least once during pregnancy. The prevalence of emotional problems at 6 and 11 years was 13.6 and 19.9%, respectively. For hyperactivity problems, prevalence was 13.9 and 16.1%, respectively. Intrauterine exposure to acetaminophen increased the odds of having emotional (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.07–2.02) and hyperactivity/inattention (OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06–1.92) problems in 6-year-old boys. At the age of 11, a small decrease in the effect was observed for both outcomes after adjustment: OR = 1.31 (95% CI: 0.99–1.73) for emotional problems and OR = 1.25 (95% CI: 0.95–1.65) for hyperactivity/inattention in boys. No association for any phenotypes at both ages was observed for girls. Conclusion: The effect of intrauterine exposure to acetaminophen in emotional and hyperactivity symptoms was dependent on sex in a Brazilian cohort. While it seemed to be important for boys, mainly at 6 years of age, for girls, no association was observed

Prevalence of enuresis and urinary symptoms at age 7 years in the 2004 birth cohort from Pelotas, Brazil

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of enuresis, urinary, and bowel symptoms and associated factors in children aged 7 years in a birth cohort. METHODS: A pre-coded questionnaire was applied to 3,602 children who belonged to a birth cohort initiated in 2004 in Pelotas, Brazil. During home visits at 12, 24, and 48 months and at age 7 years, mothers answered a questionnaire with demographic questions and characteristics of bladder and bowel habits of children using a urinary symptom score. Poisson regression was used for the hierarchical multivariable analysis, with robust variance. RESULTS: The prevalence of enuresis was 10.6%;11.7% in males and 9.3% in females; enuresis was monosymptomatic in 9.8% of the children (10.8% of males and 8.3% of females); 37.4% had symptoms up to once a week; 32.9%, two to four times a week; and 26.2%, every day, with no difference between genders. The most common urinary symptoms were urinary urgency (22.7%) and urinary retention maneuvers (38.2%). In the multivariate analysis, it was observed that the number of urinary symptoms and the number of children at home showed a direct association with the presence of enuresis, whereas maternal education was inversely associated. CONCLUSIONS: Enuresis is a prevalent condition and should be investigated in clinical practice, especially in children of lower socioeconomic status. A detailed history of urinary habits detects associated urinary symptoms, which is important for adequate classification of enuresis and subsequent management

Discriminação explícita e saúde : desenvolvimento e propriedades psicométricas de um instrumento

OBJETIVO: Desenvolver instrumento para avaliar os efeitos de experiências discriminatórias sobre condições e comportamentos em saúde, capaz de distinguir efeitos patológicos da exposição a tratamentos diferenciais de sua interpretação como eventos discriminatórios. MÉTODOS: Versões sucessivas do instrumento foram elaboradas com base em uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre escalas de discriminação, grupos focais e apreciação por um painel de sete especialistas. O refinamento do instrumento foi atingido por meio de entrevistas cognitivas e estudo-piloto, de modo que sua versão final foi aplicada em 424 estudantes de graduação no Rio de Janeiro, RJ, em 2010. A estrutura dimensional, dois tipos de confiabilidade e validade de construto foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: A análise fatorial exploratória corroborou a hipótese de unidimensionalidade do instrumento e sete especialistas indicaram que este apresentava validade de face e conteúdo. A consistência interna foi de 0,8 e a confiabilidade teste-reteste foi maior do que 0,5 para 14 dos 18 itens. O escore foi estatisticamente mais alto em indivíduos socialmente desprivilegiados e associou-se com comportamentos/condições de saúde adversos, especialmente quando tratamentos atribuídos à discriminação foram considerados. CONCLUSÕES: Estes resultados sugerem validade e confiabilidade do instrumento desenvolvido. A escala apresentada permitirá investigar aspectos inovadores das relações entre discriminação e saúde.OBJECTIVE: To develop an instrument to assess discrimination effects on health outcomes and behaviors, capable of distinguishing harmful differential treatment effects from their interpretation as discriminatory events. METHODS: Successive versions of an instrument were developed based on a systematic review of instruments assessing racial discrimination, focus groups and review by a panel comprising seven experts. The instrument was refined using cognitive interviews and pilot-testing. The final version of the instrument was administered to 424 undergraduate college students in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil, in 2010. Structural dimensionality, two types of reliability and construct validity were analyzed. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis corroborated the hypothesis of the instrument’s unidimensionality, and seven experts verified its face and content validity. The internal consistency was 0.8, and test-retest reliability was higher than 0.5 for 14 out of 18 items. The overall score was higher among socially disadvantaged individuals and correlated with adverse health behaviors/conditions, particularly when differential treatments were attributed to discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the validity and reliability of the instrument developed. The proposed instrument enables the investigation of novel aspects of the relationship between discrimination and health