68 research outputs found

    The effect of family history on screening procedures and prognosis in breast cancer patients - Results of a large population-based case-control study

    Get PDF
    Background: The potential benefit of additional breast cancer screening examinations in moderate risk patients (patients with a history of breast cancer in one or two family members) remains unclear.Methods: A large population-based case-control study on breast cancer in postmenopausal women in Germany recruited 2002-2005 (3813 cases and 7341 age-matched controls) was used to assess the association of family history with breast cancer risk. Analysis of family history, participation in screening procedures, and tumor size regarding prognosis in patients was based on follow-up data until 2015.Results: A first degree family history of breast cancer was associated with higher breast cancer risk (OR 1.39, p &lt; 0.001). Patients with a first degree family history of breast cancer were more likely to have had &gt;10 mammograms (MG) (42.7% vs. 24.9%, p &lt; 0.001) and showed a higher rate of imaging-detected tumors (MG or ultrasound) (45.8% vs. 31.9%, p &lt; 0.001). A smaller tumor size at initial diagnosis (below 2 cm) was more likely in patients with a positive family history (OR 1.45, p &lt; 0.001) and a higher number of MG (&gt;= 10 MG: OR 2.29). After accounting for tumor characteristics, mammogram regularity (HR 0.72, p &lt; 0.001) and imaging-assisted tumor detection (HR 0.66, p &lt; 0.001) were associated with better overall survival but not with a positive family history.Discussion: Patients with a positive family history had a higher rate of imaging detected tumors with smaller size at initial diagnosis compared to patients without affected family members. Screening was associated with improved survival after a breast cancer diagnosis, irrespective of a positive family history. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</p

    Correlation of Isotope Count With Sentinel Node Positivity in Vulvar Cancer

    Get PDF
    Objective: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become standard of care in early stage vulvar cancer. As the correlation of isotope count with the presence of metastases remains unclear, often several active nodes are excised per groin. This can result in increased morbidity in node-negative disease despite of SNB. In the current analysis, we assess whether resection of the hottest node could be sufficient to detect sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. Methods: Patients with primary vulvar cancer receiving an SNB with radioactive tracer at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated. Results: A total of 145 patients with SNB were analyzed;thereof, 144 underwent bilateral SNB, resulting in 289 analyzed groins. A median of 2 SLNs (range, 1-7) per groin were removed. From 94 (32.5%) of 289 groins, more than 2 SLNs were excised. Median overall SLN isotope count was 1400 cps. In 50 groins, a positive SLN was detected (unilateral in 38 patients, bilateral in 6). The median number of positive SLN per groin was 1 (range, 1-4). The SLN with the highest isotope count carried metastases in 36 (78.3%) of 46 groins (in 4 cases, the highest count was unknown). In 10 (21.7%) of 46 positive groins, the SLN with the highest count was not the metastatic SLN (9/10 second highest count). Median count of these 10 SLN was 60% of the highest count with a range from 11.0% to 74.0%. Conclusions: The highest isotope count does not reliably detect the positive SLN in vulvar cancer. To prevent mostly fatal groin recurrences, surgeons should continue to remove all SLN accumulating relevant radioactive tracer over background activity

    Immunosuppressive M2 TAMs represent a promising target population to enhance phagocytosis of ovarian cancer cells in vitro

    Get PDF
    IntroductionTumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) represent an important cell population within the tumor microenvironment, but little is known about the phenotype and function of these cells. The present study aims to characterize macrophages in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).MethodsPhenotype and expression of co-regulatory markers were assessed on TAMs derived from malignant ascites (MA) or peripheral blood (PB) by multiparametric flow cytometry. Samples were obtained from HGSOC patients (n=29) and healthy donors (HDs, n=16). Additional expression analysis was performed by RNAseq (n=192). Correlation with clinically relevant parameters was conducted and validated by a second patient cohort (n=517). Finally, the role of TIGIT in repolarization and phagocytosis was investigated in vitro.ResultsExpression of the M2-associated receptors CD163, CD204, and CD206, as well as of the co-regulatory receptors TIGIT, CD226, TIM-3, and LAG-3 was significantly more frequent on macrophages in HGSOC than in HDs. CD39 and CD73 were broadly expressed on (mainly M2) macrophages, but without a clear clustering in HGSOC. CD163 mRNA levels were higher in TAMs from patients with residual tumor mass after surgery and associated with a shorter overall survival. In addition, TIGIT expression was associated with a higher tumor grading, indicating a prognostic relevance of M2 infiltration in HGSOC. TIGIT blockade significantly reduced the frequency of M2 macrophages. Moreover, combined blockade of TIGIT and CD47 significantly increased phagocytosis of ovarian cancer cells by TAMs in comparison to a single blockade of CD47.ConclusionCombined blockade of TIGIT and CD47 represents a promising approach to enhance anti-CD47-facilitated phagocytosis

    Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Get PDF
    There is a need to develop and validate biomarkers for treatment response and survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). The chemotherapy response score (CRS) stratifies patients into complete/near-complete (CRS3), partial (CRS2), and no/minimal (CRS1) response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Our aim was to review current evidence to determine whether the CRS is prognostic in women with tubo-ovarian HGSC treated with NACT.This article is freely available via Open Access. Click on the Publisher URL to access the full-text via the publisher's site

    Ovarian cancer-cell pericellular hyaluronan deposition negatively impacts prognosis of ovarian cancer patients

    No full text
    Background: Hyaluronan (HA), a component of the extracellular matrix, is frequently increased under pathological conditions including cancer. Not only stroma cells but also cancer cells themselves synthesize HA, and the interaction of HA with its cognate receptors promotes malignant progression and metastasis. Methods: In the present study, HA deposition in tissue sections was analyzed by hyaluronan-binding protein (HABP) ligand histochemistry in 17 borderline tumors and 102 primary and 20 recurrent ovarian cancer samples. The intensity and, particularly, localization of the HA deposition were recorded: for the localization, the pericellular deposition around the ovarian cancer cells was distinguished from the deposition within the stromal compartment. These histochemical data were correlated with clinical and pathological parameters. Additionally, within a reduced subgroup of ovarian cancer samples (n = 70), the RNA levels of several HA-associated genes were correlated with the HA localization and intensity. Results: Both stroma-localized and pericellular tumor-cell-associated HA deposition were observed. Cancer-cell pericellular HA deposition, irrespective of its staining intensity, was significantly associated with malignancy, and in the primary ovarian cancer cohort, it represents an independent unfavorable prognostic marker for overall survival. Furthermore, a significant association between high CD44, HAS2 and HAS3 mRNA levels and a cancer-cell pericellular HA-deposition pattern was noted. In contrast, stromal hyaluronan deposition had no impact on ovarian cancer prognosis. Conclusions: In conclusion, the site of HA deposition is of prognostic value, but the amount deposited is not. The significant association of only peritumoral cancer-cell HA deposition with high CD44 mRNA expression levels suggests a pivotal role of the CD44–HA signaling axis for malignant progression in ovarian cancer

    Variation in cell signaling protein expression may introduce sampling bias in primary epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Get PDF
    Although the expression of cell signaling proteins is used as prognostic and predictive biomarker, variability of protein levels within tumors is not well studied. We assessed intratumoral heterogeneity of protein expression within primary ovarian cancer. Full-length proteins were extracted from 88 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples of 13 primary high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas with 5-9 samples each. In addition, 14 samples of normal fallopian tube epithelium served as reference. Quantitative reverse phase protein arrays were used to analyze the expression of 36 cell signaling proteins including HER2, EGFR, PI3K/Akt, and angiogenic pathways as well as 15 activated (phosphorylated) proteins. We found considerable intratumoral heterogeneity in the expression of proteins with a mean coefficient of variation of 25% (range 17-53%). The extent of intratumoral heterogeneity differed between proteins (p<0.005). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the extent of heterogeneity between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated proteins. In comparison, we assessed the variation of protein levels amongst tumors from different patients, which revealed a similar mean coefficient of variation of 21% (range 12-48%). Based on hierarchical clustering, samples from the same patient clustered more closely together compared to samples from different patients. However, a clear separation of tumor versus normal tissue by clustering was only achieved when mean expression values of all individual samples per tumor were analyzed. While differential expression of some proteins was detected independently of the sampling method used, the majority of proteins only demonstrated differential expression when mean expression values of multiple samples per tumor were analyzed. Our data indicate that assessment of established and novel cell signaling proteins as diagnostic or prognostic markers may require sampling of serous ovarian cancers at several distinct locations to avoid sampling bias

    The future of gynecologic oncology. Challenges - opportunities

    No full text
    The gynecologist as gynecologic oncologist: Comprehensive knowledge about oncologic diseases of the breast and the female genital tract is an essential part of the residency program in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Medical training includes prevention, diagnostics, surgical, medical as well as complementary therapy and follow-up of female cancer. The fellowship in Gynecologic Oncology aims to deepen these basic skills. Knowledge in diagnosis and indications, respectively, for medical and surgical oncologic treatment strategies is expanded. Surgical skills in oncologic procedures including breast and abdominal surgery are acquired. After finishing the fellowship, the gynecologic oncologist should be capable to indicate, plan and perform medical and surgical treatments in cancerous diseases of the breast and the female genital tract. Moreover, it is essential for gynecologic oncologists to understand and include multidisciplinary treatment strategies in cooperation with radiotherapists, general surgeons and medical oncologists to achieve optimal results for their cancer patient
    corecore