19 research outputs found

    Damage and Control of Soybean Aphid

    Get PDF
    The soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, is one of the major insect pests of seedling soybean. This aphid has become a serious problem in soybean production due to heavy infestation in recent years and lack of favorable varieties resistant to soybean aphids. To understand the damage by soybean aphids and evaluation of control effect, in 1989-1990, we investigated the population dynamics of soybean aphid in the fields and its effect on soybean growth, development and yield.Originating text in Chinese.Citation: Wang, Suyun, Sun, Yajie, Chen, Ruilu, Zhai, Baoping, Bao, Xiangzhi. (1994). Damage and Control of Soybean Aphid. Technology and Promotion of Plant Protection, 2, 5-6

    Effects of Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines on Soybean Growth and Yield

    Get PDF
    Population dynamics of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines and its effects on soybean growth and yield were surveyed in 1989-1990. Experiments were conducted in the naturally infested plots and in the treated plots using 10% enhanced Dimethoate. In 1989, soybean aphids in the untreated plots developed earlier and increased rapidly. Aphid density per 100 plants on June 15th was over 10,000, and the rapid development period was over 40 d. But aphids in 1990 developed slightly later with a shorter development period. Soybeans in the untreated plots significantly displayed the symptoms of distorted leaves, shorter stems and stunted plants. Plants in the treated plots were higher (20.2 cm in 1989) than those in the untreated plots. Soybean aphids significantly affected soybean yields. Yields in the untreated plots reduced 27.8% compared to that in the treated plots in 1989.Originating text in Chinese.Citation: Wang, Suyun, Bao, Xiangzhi, Sun, Yajie, Chen, Ruilu, Zhai, Baoping, Bao, Xiangzhi. (1996). Effects of Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines on Soybean Growth and Yield. Soybean Science, 15(3), 243-247

    The ‘migratory connectivity’ concept, and its applicability to insect migrants

    Get PDF
    Migratory connectivity describes the degree of linkage between different parts of an animal’s migratory range due to the movement trajectories of individuals. High connectivity occurs when individuals from one particular part of the migratory range move almost exclusively to another localized part of the migratory range with little mixing with individuals from other regions. Conversely, low migratory connectivity describes the situation where individuals spread over a wide area during migration and experience a large degree of mixing with individuals from elsewhere. The migratory connectivity concept is frequently applied to vertebrate migrants (especially birds), and it is highly relevant to conservation and management of populations. However, it is rarely employed in the insect migration literature, largely because much less is known about the migration circuits of most migratory insects than is known about birds. In this review, we discuss the applicability of the migratory connectivity concept to long-range insect migrations. In contrast to birds, insect migration circuits typically comprise multigenerational movements of geographically unstructured (non-discrete) populations between broad latitudinal zones. Also, compared to the faster-flying birds, the lower degree of control over movement directions would also tend to reduce connectivity in many insect migrants. Nonetheless, after taking account of these differences, we argue that the migratory connectivity framework can still be applied to insects, and we go on to consider postulated levels of connectivity in some of the most intensively studied insect migrants. We conclude that a greater understanding of insect migratory connectivity would be of value for conserving threatened species and managing pests

    Temporary inhibition of positive phototaxis in emigratory population of  Nilaparvata lugens by mark-release-recapture.

    No full text
    Light traps are used to determine the temporal and spatial dynamics of the migratory brown planthoppers (BPHs) Nilaparvata lugens. But very little is known whether newly emerged adults respond to local light traps during the emigration period. Thus, it is important to evaluate the efficiency of light traps in attracting emigrant and immigrant populations to improve forecasting and control of this pest. The migration periods of N. lugens were determined by field surveys in Fuyang, Zhejiang province in 2012 and Yongfu, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in 2013. Mark-release-recapture experiments with both newly emerged (unflown) and flight experienced (flown) N. lugens were conducted at the two study sites. The marking method did not have any significant effect on the survival or flight capability of the N. lugens. A total of 4800 marked flown and 8400 unflown BPHs were released at a distance of 10, 20 and 30 m from 45-watt fluorescent actinic light traps. The results showed that without wind (< 3.2 m/s) or rainfall conditions, the overall recapture rate of flown BPHs was higher than that of unflown BPHs (9.60% and 0.92%, respectively; χ21 = 589.66, P < 0.0001). Curve estimation regression analysis showed that flown BPHs were attracted to the light source at a distance of 19.77 m, and unflown BPH at a distance of 5.35 m, with these distances corresponding to a 5% recapture rate. Given that the population dynamics of BPHs in the light traps were not synchronous with that in the fields, our results indicate that only a few emerging BPHs in an infested site can be captured locally by light traps. Therefore, care must be taken in estimating the abundance of the sample to absolute local abundance during sedentary and emigration period
    corecore