8 research outputs found

    Fibrations of 3-manifolds and asymptotic translation length in the arc complex

    Full text link
    Given a 3-manifold MM fibering over the circle, we investigate how the asymptotic translation lengths of pseudo-Anosov monodromies in the arc complex vary as we vary the fibration. We formalize this problem by defining normalized asymptotic translation length functions μd\mu_d for every integer d≥1d \ge 1 on the rational points of a fibered face of the unit ball of the Thurston norm on H1(M;R)H^1(M;\mathbb{R}). We show that even though the functions μd\mu_d themselves are typically nowhere continuous, the sets of accumulation points of their graphs on dd-dimensional slices of the fibered face are rather nice and in a way reminiscent of Fried's convex and continuous normalized stretch factor function. We also show that these sets of accumulation points depend only on the shape of the corresponding slice. We obtain a particularly concrete description of these sets when the slice is a simplex. We also compute μ1\mu_1 at infinitely many points for the mapping torus of the simplest hyperbolic braid to show that the values of μ1\mu_1 are rather arbitrary. This suggests that giving a formula for the functions μd\mu_d seems very difficult even in the simplest cases.Comment: 47 pages, 13 figure

    Minimal pseudo-Anosov stretch factors on nonoriented surfaces

    Get PDF
    We determine the smallest stretch factor among pseudo-Anosov maps with an orientable invariant foliation on the closed nonorientable surfaces of genus 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20. We also determine the smallest stretch factor of an orientation-reversing pseudo-Anosov map with orientable invariant foliations on the closed orientable surfaces of genus 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. As a byproduct, we obtain that the stretch factor of a pseudo-Anosov map on a nonorientable surface or an orientation-reversing pseudo-Anosov map on an orientable surface does not have Galois conjugates on the unit circle. This shows that the techniques that were used to disprove Penner’s conjecture on orientable surfaces are ineffective in the nonorientable cases

    Minimal Penner dilatations on nonorientable surfaces

    Full text link
    For any nonorientable closed surface, we determine the minimal dilatation among pseudo-Anosov mapping classes arising from Penner's construction. We deduce that the sequence of minimal Penner dilatations has exactly two accumulation points, in contrast to the case of orientable surfaces where there is only one accumulation point. One of our key techniques is representing pseudo-Anosov dilatations as roots of Alexander polynomials of fibred links and comparing dilatations using the skein relation for Alexander polynomials.Comment: 30 pages, 17 figure

    How large dimension guarantees a given angle?

    Get PDF
    We study the following two problems: (1) Given n≥2n\ge 2 and \al, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact set A\su\Rn have if AA does not contain three points that form an angle \al? (2) Given \al and \de, how large Hausdorff dimension can a %compact subset AA of a Euclidean space have if AA does not contain three points that form an angle in the \de-neighborhood of \al? An interesting phenomenon is that different angles show different behaviour in the above problems. Apart from the clearly special extreme angles 0 and 180∘180^\circ, the angles 60∘,90∘60^\circ,90^\circ and 120∘120^\circ also play special role in problem (2): the maximal dimension is smaller for these special angles than for the other angles. In problem (1) the angle 90∘90^\circ seems to behave differently from other angles

    How large dimension guarantees a given angle

    Get PDF
    Abstract We study the following two problems: (1) Given n ≥ 2 and α, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact set A ⊂ R n have if A does not contain three points that form an angle α? (2) Given α and δ, how large Hausdorff dimension can a compact subset A of a Euclidean space have if A does not contain three points that form an angle in the δ-neighborhood of α? Some angles (0, 60 • ) turn out to behave differently than other α ∈ [0, 180 • ]
    corecore