ADSORPTION OF SYNTHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICALS: A COMPARISON OF SUPERFINE POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON WITH POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON

In literature, manufacturer-supplied powdered activated carbon has been ground to produce submicron particles with mean diameter lower than 1µm for use as an adsorbent during water treatment. Superfine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) can be used for removal of natural organic matter as well as synthetic organic chemicals (SOCs) from water. It has been suggested that SPAC has higher adsorption capacity than powdered activated carbon (PAC) due to larger external surface area and mesopore volume. Another advantage of SPAC over PAC is the faster uptake rate for both NOM and SOC during adsorption owing to small particle size. Therefore, understanding SPAC adsorption capacity and kinetics on NOM and SOC is crucial for future studies and usage of it. The main objectives of this study were to: (i) understand the impact of crushing on carbon characteristics; (ii) investigate the SPAC adsorption capacity and rate for selected SOCs in distilled and deionized water (DDW) and natural waters from Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and compare with PAC adsorption; (iii) evaluate adsorption mechanism of four SOCs, phenanthrene (PNT), atrazine (ATZ) , carbamazepine (CMZ) and 2-phenylphenol (2PP), with different properties planarity, polarity, and hydrogen/electron donor/acceptor ability on SPAC and PAC. One commercial PAC and its SPAC form created using a special mill were used in the study. Isotherm and kinetic experiments were performed in five different waters: DDW, diluted Edisto raw river (DOC=4mg/L), diluted Myrtle Beach raw waters (DOC=4mg/L and 10 mg/L) and Myrtle Beach treated (after conventional treatment) water (DOC=4 mg/L). One week and six hours contact times were used for the isotherm and kinetic experiments. First, the role of carbon characteristics on the adsorption was examined. The characterization of SPAC and PAC samples showed that the crushing process caused some changes in the pore volume distribution and surface acidity of the activated carbon. After pulverization, the pore volume distribution was mainly formed by mesopore and macropore region rather than micropore region. Carbon blending caused an increase of iron, nitrogen and oxygen content. The oxidation of surfaces and pHPZC values were decreased. Then, the SPAC and PAC adsorption capacity and rate for selected SOCs in distilled and deionized water (DDW) and natural waters from Myrtle Beach were investigated. The isotherm results showed that all PAC adsorption capacities were higher than SPAC. However for adsorption kinetics, SPAC exhibited faster uptakes for PNT, ATZ and CMZ in all background solution than PAC did. On the other hand, SPAC was not advantageous for 2PP compared to PAC in both DDW and natural waters. That may result from multiple factors: (i) higher solubility of 2 PP, (ii) the larger third dimension as compared to other molecules, and (iii) the presence of an electron donating (-OH) group on its structure, which makes the molecule slightly negative charge and cause the deduction in interaction with SPAC whose surface is slightly higher negatively charged. The presence of NOM had a small impact on the adsorption rates of four SOCs by SPAC during the first six hours contact time. The difference in the NOM characteristics (MB raw SUVA254=4.4 and MB treated SUVA254=2.1, Edisto SUVA254=2) and NOM concentrations (4 mg/L vs. 10 mg/L) did not significantly impact the adsorption rates. The only exception was observed for atrazine. In summary, these findings indicated that the advantage of using SPAC over PAC at the short contact time can be compound specific; on the other hand, SPAC loses its advantages for small molecular weight compounds at equilibrium condition

Quantification of methane emissions from UK biogas plants

The rising number of operational biogas plants in the UK brings a new emissions category to consider for methane monitoring, quantification and reduction. Minimising methane losses from biogas plants to the atmosphere is critical not only because of their contribution of methane to global warming but also with respect to the sustainability of renewable energy production. Mobile greenhouse gas surveys were conducted to detect plumes of methane emissions from the biogas plants in southern England that varied in their size, waste feed input materials and biogas utilization. Gaussian plume modelling was used to estimate total emissions of methane from ten biogas plants based on repeat passes through the plumes. Methane emission rates ranged from 0.1 to 58.7 kg CH4 hr-1, and the percentage of losses relative to the calculated production rate varied between 0.02 and 8.1%. The average emission rate was 15.9 kg CH4 hr-1, and the average loss was 3.7%. In general, methane emission rates from smaller farm biogas plants were higher than from larger food waste biogas plants. We also suggest that biogas methane emissions may account for between 0.4 and 3.8%, with an average being 1.9% of the total methane emissions in the UK excluding the sewage sludge biogas plants

Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements

This study aimed to characterize the carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C-CH4) of several methane waste sources, predominantly in the UK, and during field campaigns in the Netherlands and Turkey. CH4 plumes emitted from waste sources were detected during mobile surveys using a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyser. Air samples were collected in the plumes for subsequent isotope analysis by gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to characterize δ13C-CH4. The isotopic signatures were determined through a Keeling plot approach and the bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter (BCES) fitting method. The δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 signatures were identified from biogas plants (−54.6 ± 5.6‰, n = 34; −314.4 ± 23‰ n = 3), landfills (−56.8 ± 2.3‰, n = 43; −268.2 ± 2.1‰, n = 2), sewage treatment plants (−51.6 ± 2.2‰, n = 15; −303.9 ± 22‰, n = 6), composting facilities (−54.7 ± 3.9‰, n = 6), a landfill leachate treatment plant (−57.1 ± 1.8‰, n = 2), one water treatment plant (−53.7 ± 0.1‰) and a waste recycling facility (−53.2 ± 0.2‰). The overall signature of 71 waste sources ranged from −64.4 to −44.3‰, with an average of −55.1 ± 4.1‰ (n = 102) for δ13C, −341 to −267‰, with an average of −300.3 ± 25‰ (n = 11) for δ2H, which can be distinguished from other source types in the UK such as gas leaks and ruminants. The study also demonstrates that δ2H-CH4 signatures, in addition to δ13C-CH4, can aid in better waste source apportionment and increase the granularity of isotope data required to improve regional modelling

New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane

Recent climate change mitigation strategies rely on the reduction of methane (CH4) emissions. Carbon and hydrogen isotope ratio (δ13CCH4 and δ2HCH4) measurements can be used to distinguish sources and thus to understand the CH4 budget better. The CH4 emission estimates by models are sensitive to the isotopic signatures assigned to each source category, so it is important to provide representative estimates of the different CH4 source isotopic signatures worldwide. We present new measurements of isotope signatures of various, mainly anthropogenic, CH4 sources in Europe, which represent a substantial contribution to the global dataset of source isotopic measurements from the literature, especially for δ2HCH4. They improve the definition of δ13CCH4 from waste sources, and demonstrate the use of δ2HCH4 for fossil fuel source attribution. We combined our new measurements with the last published database of CH4 isotopic signatures and with additional literature, and present a new global database. We found that microbial sources are generally well characterised. The large variability in fossil fuel isotopic compositions requires particular care in the choice of weighting criteria for the calculation of a representative global value. The global dataset could be further improved by measurements from African, South American, and Asian countries, and more measurements from pyrogenic sources. We improved the source characterisation of CH4 emissions using stable isotopes and associated uncertainty, to be used in top-down studies. We emphasise that an appropriate use of the database requires the analysis of specific parameters in relation to source type and the region of interest. The final version of the European CH4 isotope database coupled with a global inventory of fossil and non-fossil δ13CCH4 and δ2HCH4 source signature measurements is available at 10.24416/UU01-YP43IN

Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements

This study aimed to characterize the carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C-CH4) of several methane waste sources, predominantly in the UK, and during field campaigns in the Netherlands and Turkey. CH4 plumes emitted from waste sources were detected during mobile surveys using a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyser. Air samples were collected in the plumes for subsequent isotope analysis by gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to characterize δ13C-CH4. The isotopic signatures were determined through a Keeling plot approach and the bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter (BCES) fitting method. The δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 signatures were identified from biogas plants (−54.6 ± 5.6‰, n = 34; −314.4 ± 23‰ n = 3), landfills (−56.8 ± 2.3‰, n = 43; −268.2 ± 2.1‰, n = 2), sewage treatment plants (−51.6 ± 2.2‰, n = 15; −303.9 ± 22‰, n = 6), composting facilities (−54.7 ± 3.9‰, n = 6), a landfill leachate treatment plant (−57.1 ± 1.8‰, n = 2), one water treatment plant (−53.7 ± 0.1‰) and a waste recycling facility (−53.2 ± 0.2‰). The overall signature of 71 waste sources ranged from −64.4 to −44.3‰, with an average of −55.1 ± 4.1‰ (n = 102) for δ13C, −341 to −267‰, with an average of −300.3 ± 25‰ (n = 11) for δ2H, which can be distinguished from other source types in the UK such as gas leaks and ruminants. The study also demonstrates that δ2H-CH4 signatures, in addition to δ13C-CH4, can aid in better waste source apportionment and increase the granularity of isotope data required to improve regional modelling

Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements

This study aimed to characterize the carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C-CH4) of several methane waste sources, predominantly in the UK, and during field campaigns in the Netherlands and Turkey. CH4 plumes emitted from waste sources were detected during mobile surveys using a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyser. Air samples were collected in the plumes for subsequent isotope analysis by gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to characterize δ13C-CH4. The isotopic signatures were determined through a Keeling plot approach and the bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter (BCES) fitting method. The δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 signatures were identified from biogas plants (−54.6 ± 5.6‰, n = 34; −314.4 ± 23‰ n = 3), landfills (−56.8 ± 2.3‰, n = 43; −268.2 ± 2.1‰, n = 2), sewage treatment plants (−51.6 ± 2.2‰, n = 15; −303.9 ± 22‰, n = 6), composting facilities (−54.7 ± 3.9‰, n = 6), a landfill leachate treatment plant (−57.1 ± 1.8‰, n = 2), one water treatment plant (−53.7 ± 0.1‰) and a waste recycling facility (−53.2 ± 0.2‰). The overall signature of 71 waste sources ranged from −64.4 to −44.3‰, with an average of −55.1 ± 4.1‰ (n = 102) for δ13C, −341 to −267‰, with an average of −300.3 ± 25‰ (n = 11) for δ2H, which can be distinguished from other source types in the UK such as gas leaks and ruminants. The study also demonstrates that δ2H-CH4 signatures, in addition to δ13C-CH4, can aid in better waste source apportionment and increase the granularity of isotope data required to improve regional modelling

Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements

This study aimed to characterize the carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C-CH4) of several methane waste sources, predominantly in the UK, and during field campaigns in the Netherlands and Turkey. CH4 plumes emitted from waste sources were detected during mobile surveys using a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyser. Air samples were collected in the plumes for subsequent isotope analysis by gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to characterize δ13C-CH4. The isotopic signatures were determined through a Keeling plot approach and the bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter (BCES) fitting method. The δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 signatures were identified from biogas plants (−54.6 ± 5.6‰, n = 34; −314.4 ± 23‰ n = 3), landfills (−56.8 ± 2.3‰, n = 43; −268.2 ± 2.1‰, n = 2), sewage treatment plants (−51.6 ± 2.2‰, n = 15; −303.9 ± 22‰, n = 6), composting facilities (−54.7 ± 3.9‰, n = 6), a landfill leachate treatment plant (−57.1 ± 1.8‰, n = 2), one water treatment plant (−53.7 ± 0.1‰) and a waste recycling facility (−53.2 ± 0.2‰). The overall signature of 71 waste sources ranged from −64.4 to −44.3‰, with an average of −55.1 ± 4.1‰ (n = 102) for δ13C, −341 to −267‰, with an average of −300.3 ± 25‰ (n = 11) for δ2H, which can be distinguished from other source types in the UK such as gas leaks and ruminants. The study also demonstrates that δ2H-CH4 signatures, in addition to δ13C-CH4, can aid in better waste source apportionment and increase the granularity of isotope data required to improve regional modelling

Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements

This study aimed to characterize the carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C-CH4) of several methane waste sources, predominantly in the UK, and during field campaigns in the Netherlands and Turkey. CH4 plumes emitted from waste sources were detected during mobile surveys using a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyser. Air samples were collected in the plumes for subsequent isotope analysis by gas chromatography isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) to characterize δ13C-CH4. The isotopic signatures were determined through a Keeling plot approach and the bivariate correlated errors and intrinsic scatter (BCES) fitting method. The δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 signatures were identified from biogas plants (−54.6 ± 5.6‰, n = 34; −314.4 ± 23‰ n = 3), landfills (−56.8 ± 2.3‰, n = 43; −268.2 ± 2.1‰, n = 2), sewage treatment plants (−51.6 ± 2.2‰, n = 15; −303.9 ± 22‰, n = 6), composting facilities (−54.7 ± 3.9‰, n = 6), a landfill leachate treatment plant (−57.1 ± 1.8‰, n = 2), one water treatment plant (−53.7 ± 0.1‰) and a waste recycling facility (−53.2 ± 0.2‰). The overall signature of 71 waste sources ranged from −64.4 to −44.3‰, with an average of −55.1 ± 4.1‰ (n = 102) for δ13C, −341 to −267‰, with an average of −300.3 ± 25‰ (n = 11) for δ2H, which can be distinguished from other source types in the UK such as gas leaks and ruminants. The study also demonstrates that δ2H-CH4 signatures, in addition to δ13C-CH4, can aid in better waste source apportionment and increase the granularity of isotope data required to improve regional modelling

Impact of peritoneal transport characteristics on cardiac function in paediatric peritoneal dialysis patients: a Turkish Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (TUPEPD) report

Methods. One hundred and ten PD patients (13 +/- 5 years, PD vintage: 31 +/- 27 months) were enrolled into the study. Four-hour dialysate/plasma creatinine ratio was used for differentiating PET groups. Thirty-eight patients were high transporters, 29 were high-average transporters and 43 were low-average/low transporters. Echocardiography was performed in all subjects