Investigating the implementation and impact of “Better Care Better Value” prescribing policy for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting

Background: In April 2009, the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement released four Better Care Better Value (BCBV) prescribing indicators. One indicator targeted renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) drugs, i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), to improve their prescribing efficiency. The indicator affects the proportion of items written for ACEIs as a percentage of the total number of prescriptions for RAAS drugs. A proportion of 80% ACEIs has been proposed and considered as an achievable target based on the small proportion (2–10%) of patients who cannot tolerate the ACEIs-related side effects, mostly dry cough. However, neither the impact of the BCBV indicator on the utilisation of ACEIs/ARBs nor its cost-saving implication is yet known. The BCBV indicator involves switching established ARBs users to ACEIs, where appropriate. However, no previous studies have specifically investigated the clinical and economic impact of the switch of ARBs and hence it is unclear whether the switch from ARBs to ACEIs, promoted by the BCBV indicator, would be associated with any clinical or economic issues. Without any financial incentives or legislation enforcement, uptake of the BCBV policy is predicted to be low, especially as evidence suggests that single measures are ineffective in altering GPs’ prescribing behaviour. However, the uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator has not yet been explored. Aims: This thesis aimed to evaluate the impact of the BCBV indicator for ACEIs/ARBs on the utilisation of ACEIs/ARBs in treating hypertension (HT) and any associated cost savings. The effects of switching patients from ARBs to ACEIs on clinical outcomes (adherence, blood pressure [BP] level and HT-related complications), healthcare resources and costs were also investigated. Prior to this, patients’ adherence and persistence patterns (discontinuation and switching), and potential associated factors were studied. Finally, the uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator in real practice was explored. Methods:This research used an explanatory sequential mixed-method approach. Firstly, an interrupted time series analysis was used on data extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), from April 2006 to March 2012, to examine the impact of the BCBV indicator on the repeated cross-sectional monthly ACEIs/ARBs prescriptions and costs in patients with primary hypertension, which was validated using national dispensing datasets. Secondly, a retrospective cohort study was conducted using prescription records extracted from CPRD for patients with primary hypertension who were prescribed antihypertensive drugs from April 2006 to March 2013. Patients’ adherence and persistence patterns (including switching) to antihypertensive drug classes were quantified and their association with patients’ characteristics tested, using Generalised Linear Models and survival analysis. Thirdly, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who switched their index drug class from ARBs to ACEIs to evaluate the clinical outcomes and resources used associated with ARBs switching, using data from CPRD in linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics, and applying multilevel regression for data analysis. Finally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 general practitioners, to explore their views about ACEIs/ARBs prescribing and the BCBV policy to understand the reasons underpinning the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of the BCBV indicator. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach. Results:Impact of the BCBV indicator on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost saving. The ACEIs prescription proportion declined from 71.2% in April 2006 to 70.7% in March 2012. The policy initially resulted in a sudden reduction of 0.3% (95%CI: –0.44, –0.16) in the level of ACEIs prescription proportion; however, it was thereafter associated with a sustained, significant increase of 0.013% (95%CI: 0.0007, 0.02). The failure to achieve the 80% target by the end of the study period resulted in missing a potential cost saving of 23.9% of the total ACEIs/ARBs cost. In June 2014, a potential cost saving of ~£1 million was predicted, had the 80% target been achieved; this substantial saving was several years after the availability of several low-cost generic ARBs. Adherence and persistence to antihypertensive drug classes: Among the 176,835 patients with primary hypertension included in this analysis, 38.4% and 20% were non-adherent (proportion of days covered [PDC]<80%) to their antihypertensive drug class and therapy, respectively. The discontinuation rate of antihypertensive drug class (56.1%) and therapy (35.5%) was relatively high by the end of six-year follow-up period. Using ARBs as the index drug class, prevalent hypertensive patients, prevalent antihypertensive drug users and increasing age were associated with higher PDC to antihypertensive drug class and therapy but a lower risk of drug discontinuation; whereas a higher deprivation level, comorbidity score and switching of antihypertensive drug class were associated with lower PDC to antihypertensive drug therapy but a higher risk of discontinuation. Overall, 26% of the included patients switched their antihypertensive drug class. Using ARBs, higher deprivation, higher comorbidity and prevalent antihypertensive drug users were protective factors against switching; whereas female gender, prevalent hypertensive patients, higher BP level and increasing age were associated with a higher risk of switching. Clinical and economic implications of switching patients from ARBs to ACEIs: Of the 46,193 patients who switched their antihypertensive drug therapy, only 470 patients switched from ARBs to ACEIs – they were included in this study. Based on whether the patient combined ACEIs with other antihypertensive drug classes in the post-switching period, 369 patients were classified into ACEIs-combined group and 101 patients into ACEIs-monotherapy group. Compared with the pre-switching period, the proportion of non-adherent patients (PDC<80%) in the post-switching period increased significantly (17% vs. 27%); however, this significant increase was observed only in the ACEIs-combined group (17.3% vs. 29%). The switching of ARBs was associated with a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP (144.2 vs. 141.9 mmHg, p<0.001) and (84.6 vs. 82.6 mmHg, p<0.001), respectively; however, this effect was found only in the ACEIs-combined group. The incidence of all HT-related complications was comparable in both pre- and post-switching periods, except for the incidence of MI, which reduced significantly only in the ACEIs-combined group (OR=0.1, 95%CI: 0.04, 0.6). Importantly, the switching of ARBs to ACEIs was associated with a significant reduction in the total medical costs (mean cost difference: –£329.2, 95%CI: –534.6, –205.7). Uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator: Potential barriers suggested for the poor uptake of the BCBV policy, included a lack of GP awareness of the policy, GPs’ negative attitudes toward the policy and a lack of financial incentives. Among other reasons, the current high proportion of ARBs users appeared to be related to an over-switching of ACEIs to ARBs in anticipation of an ACEIs-related dry cough. Suggested measures for increasing the policy uptake included effective dissemination strategies, linking the policy to financial incentives and providing guidance on performing the switching. Furthermore, strategies to address the over-switching of ACEIs to ARBs were considered essential for the BCBV policy to achieve its 80% ACEIs target. Conclusions:The BCBV indicator was ineffective and failed to achieve the 80% ACEIs target. The association of achieving the 80% target with a remarkable cost-saving opportunity and the lack of any negative clinical consequences following the switching of ARBs to ACEIs indicate the ongoing necessity to reconsider and reinforce this policy through multiple initiatives to increase its future effectiveness, building on the study’s identified barriers and suggested solutions. This thesis represents a case study of a failed and an ineffective prescribing policy, attributed primarily to inappropriate policy implementation. It provides key lessons for policy makers and healthcare authorities on the importance of effective implementation strategies as an integral component to any successful policy

The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design

In April/2009, the UK National Health Service initiated four Better Care Better Value (BCBV) prescribing indicators, one of which encouraged the prescribing of cheaper angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) instead of expensive angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), with 80 % ACEIs/20 % ARBs as a proposed, and achievable target. The policy was intended to save costs without affecting patient outcomes. However, little is known about the actual impact of the BCBV indicator on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost-savings. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of BCBV policy on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost-savings, including exploration of regional variations of the policy’s impact

A multicentre point prevalence survey of hospital antibiotic prescribing and quality indices in the Kurdistan Region Government of Northern Iraq : the need for urgent action

Background: Rationale antimicrobial use is crucial to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats. No study has been undertaken in Iraq, using validated methodologies, to document current antimicrobial use and areas for improvement given high AMR rates. Objectives: To assess antibiotic prescribing patterns in this region using the Global PPS methodology to identify targets for quality improvement Methods: Point prevalence survey (PPS), using the Global PPS methodology, conducted among the three major public hospitals in Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)/northern Iraq from September-December 2019. Prevalence and quality of antibiotic use were estimated/assessed using agreed quality indicators. Results: Prevalence of antibiotic use was high (93.7%;n=192/205); with third generation cephalosporins as the most commonly prescribed antibiotics (52.6%;n=140/266). Reasons for treatment was recorded for only 61.7% (n=164/266) of antibiotics and high use (89.9%) of parenteral therapy was observed. All therapy was empirical, no stop/review dates were recorded and no treatment guidelines were available. Majority of the prescribed antibiotics (62%; n=165/266) were from the WHO Watch list. Conclusions: Prevalence of antibiotic use was the highest not only in the region but globally including Africa, coupled with significant evidence of sub-optimal prescribing practice. Swift action is needed to improve future prescribing to reduce AMR. One-two areas should initially be targeted for quality improvement including development of local guidelines, documentation of antibiotic indication and/or stop/review dates

Investigating the implementation and impact of “Better Care Better Value” prescribing policy for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting

Background: In April 2009, the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement released four Better Care Better Value (BCBV) prescribing indicators. One indicator targeted renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) drugs, i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), to improve their prescribing efficiency. The indicator affects the proportion of items written for ACEIs as a percentage of the total number of prescriptions for RAAS drugs. A proportion of 80% ACEIs has been proposed and considered as an achievable target based on the small proportion (2–10%) of patients who cannot tolerate the ACEIs-related side effects, mostly dry cough. However, neither the impact of the BCBV indicator on the utilisation of ACEIs/ARBs nor its cost-saving implication is yet known. The BCBV indicator involves switching established ARBs users to ACEIs, where appropriate. However, no previous studies have specifically investigated the clinical and economic impact of the switch of ARBs and hence it is unclear whether the switch from ARBs to ACEIs, promoted by the BCBV indicator, would be associated with any clinical or economic issues. Without any financial incentives or legislation enforcement, uptake of the BCBV policy is predicted to be low, especially as evidence suggests that single measures are ineffective in altering GPs’ prescribing behaviour. However, the uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator has not yet been explored. Aims: This thesis aimed to evaluate the impact of the BCBV indicator for ACEIs/ARBs on the utilisation of ACEIs/ARBs in treating hypertension (HT) and any associated cost savings. The effects of switching patients from ARBs to ACEIs on clinical outcomes (adherence, blood pressure [BP] level and HT-related complications), healthcare resources and costs were also investigated. Prior to this, patients’ adherence and persistence patterns (discontinuation and switching), and potential associated factors were studied. Finally, the uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator in real practice was explored. Methods:This research used an explanatory sequential mixed-method approach. Firstly, an interrupted time series analysis was used on data extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), from April 2006 to March 2012, to examine the impact of the BCBV indicator on the repeated cross-sectional monthly ACEIs/ARBs prescriptions and costs in patients with primary hypertension, which was validated using national dispensing datasets. Secondly, a retrospective cohort study was conducted using prescription records extracted from CPRD for patients with primary hypertension who were prescribed antihypertensive drugs from April 2006 to March 2013. Patients’ adherence and persistence patterns (including switching) to antihypertensive drug classes were quantified and their association with patients’ characteristics tested, using Generalised Linear Models and survival analysis. Thirdly, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who switched their index drug class from ARBs to ACEIs to evaluate the clinical outcomes and resources used associated with ARBs switching, using data from CPRD in linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics, and applying multilevel regression for data analysis. Finally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 general practitioners, to explore their views about ACEIs/ARBs prescribing and the BCBV policy to understand the reasons underpinning the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of the BCBV indicator. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach. Results:Impact of the BCBV indicator on ACEIs/ARBs utilisation and cost saving. The ACEIs prescription proportion declined from 71.2% in April 2006 to 70.7% in March 2012. The policy initially resulted in a sudden reduction of 0.3% (95%CI: –0.44, –0.16) in the level of ACEIs prescription proportion; however, it was thereafter associated with a sustained, significant increase of 0.013% (95%CI: 0.0007, 0.02). The failure to achieve the 80% target by the end of the study period resulted in missing a potential cost saving of 23.9% of the total ACEIs/ARBs cost. In June 2014, a potential cost saving of ~£1 million was predicted, had the 80% target been achieved; this substantial saving was several years after the availability of several low-cost generic ARBs. Adherence and persistence to antihypertensive drug classes: Among the 176,835 patients with primary hypertension included in this analysis, 38.4% and 20% were non-adherent (proportion of days covered [PDC]<80%) to their antihypertensive drug class and therapy, respectively. The discontinuation rate of antihypertensive drug class (56.1%) and therapy (35.5%) was relatively high by the end of six-year follow-up period. Using ARBs as the index drug class, prevalent hypertensive patients, prevalent antihypertensive drug users and increasing age were associated with higher PDC to antihypertensive drug class and therapy but a lower risk of drug discontinuation; whereas a higher deprivation level, comorbidity score and switching of antihypertensive drug class were associated with lower PDC to antihypertensive drug therapy but a higher risk of discontinuation. Overall, 26% of the included patients switched their antihypertensive drug class. Using ARBs, higher deprivation, higher comorbidity and prevalent antihypertensive drug users were protective factors against switching; whereas female gender, prevalent hypertensive patients, higher BP level and increasing age were associated with a higher risk of switching. Clinical and economic implications of switching patients from ARBs to ACEIs: Of the 46,193 patients who switched their antihypertensive drug therapy, only 470 patients switched from ARBs to ACEIs – they were included in this study. Based on whether the patient combined ACEIs with other antihypertensive drug classes in the post-switching period, 369 patients were classified into ACEIs-combined group and 101 patients into ACEIs-monotherapy group. Compared with the pre-switching period, the proportion of non-adherent patients (PDC<80%) in the post-switching period increased significantly (17% vs. 27%); however, this significant increase was observed only in the ACEIs-combined group (17.3% vs. 29%). The switching of ARBs was associated with a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP (144.2 vs. 141.9 mmHg, p<0.001) and (84.6 vs. 82.6 mmHg, p<0.001), respectively; however, this effect was found only in the ACEIs-combined group. The incidence of all HT-related complications was comparable in both pre- and post-switching periods, except for the incidence of MI, which reduced significantly only in the ACEIs-combined group (OR=0.1, 95%CI: 0.04, 0.6). Importantly, the switching of ARBs to ACEIs was associated with a significant reduction in the total medical costs (mean cost difference: –£329.2, 95%CI: –534.6, –205.7). Uptake and implementation of the BCBV indicator: Potential barriers suggested for the poor uptake of the BCBV policy, included a lack of GP awareness of the policy, GPs’ negative attitudes toward the policy and a lack of financial incentives. Among other reasons, the current high proportion of ARBs users appeared to be related to an over-switching of ACEIs to ARBs in anticipation of an ACEIs-related dry cough. Suggested measures for increasing the policy uptake included effective dissemination strategies, linking the policy to financial incentives and providing guidance on performing the switching. Furthermore, strategies to address the over-switching of ACEIs to ARBs were considered essential for the BCBV policy to achieve its 80% ACEIs target. Conclusions:The BCBV indicator was ineffective and failed to achieve the 80% ACEIs target. The association of achieving the 80% target with a remarkable cost-saving opportunity and the lack of any negative clinical consequences following the switching of ARBs to ACEIs indicate the ongoing necessity to reconsider and reinforce this policy through multiple initiatives to increase its future effectiveness, building on the study’s identified barriers and suggested solutions. This thesis represents a case study of a failed and an ineffective prescribing policy, attributed primarily to inappropriate policy implementation. It provides key lessons for policy makers and healthcare authorities on the importance of effective implementation strategies as an integral component to any successful policy

Break the Silence : A Study on Auditors' Low Reporting Rates and Actions to Raise Awareness and Prevent Money Laundering

Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka den låga graden av misstanke-rapporteringar vad gäller penningtvätt bland revisorer och identifiera de bakomliggande faktorerna till detta, samt undersöka vilka åtgärder som kan vidtas för att öka revisorns medvetenhet. Studien har utgått från en kvalitativ metod med semistrukturerade intervjuer. I studiens slutsats presenteras olika faktorer som bidrar till den låga graden av misstanke-rapportering av penningtvätt bland revisorer och vilka åtgärder som bör vidtas i framtiden för att förebygga denna problematik. Studiens slutsats framhäver flertalet faktorer som bland annat omfattas av den starka lojaliteten gentemot kunder och riskerna, samt svårigheterna i att anmäla och upptäcka penningtvätt. Åtgärder som diskuterats är bland annat att erbjuda fler utbildningsmöjligheter som omfattar penningtvätt och att öka kommunikationen med olika myndigheter. Studiens slutsats betonar dessutom att åtgärder kan erbjudas i olika utsträckningar och beror bland annat på revisionsbyråns storlek och omfattning.  The purpose of this study is to investigate the low degree of suspicion reporting regarding money laundering among auditors and identify the underlying factors for this, as well as investigate what measures can be taken to increase the auditor's awareness. The study has been based on a qualitative method with semi-structured Interviews. In the studies conclusion, various factors are presented that contribute to the low degree of suspicion-reporting of money laundering among accountants and what measures should be taken in the future to prevent this problem. The studies conclusion highlights a number of factors that include, among other things, the strong loyalty towards customers and the risks, as well as the difficulties in reporting and detecting money laundering. Measures discussed include offering more educational opportunities covering money laundering and increasing communication with various authorities. The study's conclusion also emphasizes that measures can be offered to different extents and depends, among other things, on the audit firm's size and scope

Break the Silence : A Study on Auditors' Low Reporting Rates and Actions to Raise Awareness and Prevent Money Laundering

Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka den låga graden av misstanke-rapporteringar vad gäller penningtvätt bland revisorer och identifiera de bakomliggande faktorerna till detta, samt undersöka vilka åtgärder som kan vidtas för att öka revisorns medvetenhet. Studien har utgått från en kvalitativ metod med semistrukturerade intervjuer. I studiens slutsats presenteras olika faktorer som bidrar till den låga graden av misstanke-rapportering av penningtvätt bland revisorer och vilka åtgärder som bör vidtas i framtiden för att förebygga denna problematik. Studiens slutsats framhäver flertalet faktorer som bland annat omfattas av den starka lojaliteten gentemot kunder och riskerna, samt svårigheterna i att anmäla och upptäcka penningtvätt. Åtgärder som diskuterats är bland annat att erbjuda fler utbildningsmöjligheter som omfattar penningtvätt och att öka kommunikationen med olika myndigheter. Studiens slutsats betonar dessutom att åtgärder kan erbjudas i olika utsträckningar och beror bland annat på revisionsbyråns storlek och omfattning.  The purpose of this study is to investigate the low degree of suspicion reporting regarding money laundering among auditors and identify the underlying factors for this, as well as investigate what measures can be taken to increase the auditor's awareness. The study has been based on a qualitative method with semi-structured Interviews. In the studies conclusion, various factors are presented that contribute to the low degree of suspicion-reporting of money laundering among accountants and what measures should be taken in the future to prevent this problem. The studies conclusion highlights a number of factors that include, among other things, the strong loyalty towards customers and the risks, as well as the difficulties in reporting and detecting money laundering. Measures discussed include offering more educational opportunities covering money laundering and increasing communication with various authorities. The study's conclusion also emphasizes that measures can be offered to different extents and depends, among other things, on the audit firm's size and scope

The Safety Profile of Single Daily Dose of Aminoglycosides in Comparison with Multiple Daily Dose

To overcome  the  problems  which  associated  with  the standard  multiple  daily  doses (MDD) of aminoglycosides (AGs) like high incidence of toxicity(nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity)(5-25%) and high cost, an alternative approach was developed which was single daily dose (SDD).This new regimen was designed to maximize bacterial killing by optimizing the peak concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration(MIC)ratio and to reduce the potential for toxicity. The study includes 75 patients selected randomly, 50 of them received SDD regimen of age range of 17-79 years and the remaining received MDD regimen of age range of 13-71 years. The study was designed to evaluate the safety of SDD regimen in comparison with MDD regimen. All the patients in SDD group received a constant dose of   5-mg/kg/day of gentamicin and 20mg/kg/day of amikacin with a drug administration interval based on estimated creatinine clearance(CLcr): if ≥60 ml//min every 24 hours (q24h), 59- 40 ml/ min every 36hours and 39- 30 ml/min every 48 hours.The calculated dose was diluted with 0.9% normal saline or 5% dextrose to 50-100 ml and given as intravenous infusion over 30-60 minutes. In SDD group , the mean length of therapy was 6.4±1.73  days .Gentamicin accounted for 96% of the aminoglycoside use, and the majority(58%) of patients received the drug every 24 hours.The 36- and -48 hours intervals were used for 34 and 8% of the population, respectively.While in MDD group , the mean length of therapy was 5.0±0.91 days. Gentamicin accounted for all (100%) of aminoglycoside use, and all of the patients received the drug every 8 hours. No clinically apparent ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were observed in the patients in the SDD group, in contrast to the patients in MDD group, in whom 4 patients (16%) were developed nephrotoxicity and 1 patient (4%) was developed ototoxicity. The obtained results indicate that SDD regimen was safer through decreasing the incidence of both nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.For statistical analysis, ANOVA test was used with P<0.01.Each mean was expressed as mean±SEM(Standard Error of Mean). Key words: Aminoglycosides, Single Daily Dose, Nephrotoxicity and Ototoxicity

Additional file 2: of The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design

Segmented regression analysis, with all the parameter estimates, on the monthly ACEIs prescription proportion in the 13 UK regions. (DOCX 37 kb

Additional file 4: of The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design

Segmented regression analysis, with all the parameter estimates, on the quarterly number of antihypertensive prescriptions and ACEIs prescription proportion. (DOCX 35 kb

Additional file 3: of The impact of the ‘Better Care Better Value’ prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design

Segmented regression analysis, with all the parameter estimates, on the monthly cost of ACEIs/ARBs, ACEIs and ARBs. (DOCX 35 kb