Nutritional Evaluation and Optimisation in Neonates (NEON) trial of amino acid regimen and intravenous lipid composition in preterm parenteral nutrition: a randomised double-blind controlled trial

Background Parenteral nutrition (PN) is central to the care of very immature infants. Early intakes of higher amounts of amino acids and the use of lipid emulsions containing fish oils are recommended by current international recommendations. Objective To confirm the safety and demonstrate efficacy of the immediate introduction of the recommended daily intake of amino acids (Imm-RDI) and soya bean oil, medium-chain triglycerides, olive oil and fish oil lipid in PN to increase non-adipose (lean) body mass and decrease intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) content. Design Multicentre, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial and randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting Neonatal units in London and south-east England, UK. Participants Extremely preterm infants born before 31 weeks of gestation without major congenital or life-threatening abnormalities who could to be randomised to receive PN within 24 hours of birth. Interventions Infants were randomised within 24 hours of birth to receive PN containing either high [RDI of amino acids (Imm-RDI)] or low [incremental amino acids (Inc-AA) control] levels of amino acids. In addition, infants were randomised to receive either 20% SMOFlipid® (Fresenius Kabi AG, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada) or 20% Intralipid® (Fresenius Kabi AG, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada) (control). This resulted in four groups: (1) Inc-AA/Intralipid, (2) Inc-AA/SMOFlipid, (3) Imm-RDI/Intralipid and (4) Imm-RDI/SMOFlipid. The intervention was continued until infants were receiving 150 ml/kg/day of enteral feeds for 24 hours. Primary outcome measure For the amino acid intervention, this was non-adipose or lean body mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging. For the lipid composition intervention, this was IHCL content as measured by hepatic magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Primary outcomes were measured at term age equivalent, between 37 and 44 weeks postmenstrual age. Results We randomised 168 infants born before 31 weeks of gestation. We evaluated outcomes, at term, in 133 infants. There were no significant differences in non-adipose mass between the Imm-RDI and Inc-AA groups [adjusted mean difference 1.0 g, 95% confidence interval (CI) –108 to 111 g] or in levels of IHCLs between the SMOFlipid and Intralipid groups (adjusted mean SMOFlipid to Intralipid ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.6). Infants receiving the Imm-RDI were more likely than Inc-AA infants to have blood urea nitrogen levels > 7 mmol/l [75% vs. 49% (p  10 mmol/l [49% vs. 18% (p < 0.01)]. Furthermore, head circumference at term was smaller in the Imm-RDI group (mean difference –0.8 cm, 95% CI –1.5 to –0.1 cm; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in any prespecified secondary outcomes, including adiposity, liver function tests, weight, length and mortality. Limitations Not all eligible babies were available for recruitment, as pharmacy staff trained in clinical trial procedures were unavailable at weekends in three of the four centres. We were able to assess brain volumes in only one-third of participants, as imaging was carried out while the participants were sleeping naturally and we measured primary outcomes first and continued to brain imaging only if the infant remained asleep. Conclusions Immediate delivery of the recommended daily intake of parenteral amino acids does not benefit body composition or growth to term and may be harmful; SMOFlipid does not affect IHCL content. Future work The long-term functional outcomes of early administration of RDI of amino acids and the use of SMOFlipid, including neurodevelopment, body composition and metabolic health, should be evaluated. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29665319 and EudraCT 2009-016731-34. Funding This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research partnership

Level of agreement between frequently used cardiovascular risk calculators in people living with HIV

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to describe agreement between the QRISK2, Framingham and Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D) cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators in a large UK study of people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: PLWH enrolled in the Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Observations in People over Fifty (POPPY) study without a prior CVD event were included in this study. QRISK2, Framingham CVD and the full and reduced D:A:D CVD scores were calculated; participants were stratified into 'low' ( 20%) categories for each. Agreement between scores was assessed using weighted kappas and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The 730 included participants were predominantly male (636; 87.1%) and of white ethnicity (645; 88.5%), with a median age of 53 [interquartile range (IQR) 49-59] years. The median calculated 10-year CVD risk was 11.9% (IQR 6.8-18.4%), 8.9% (IQR 4.6-15.0%), 8.5% (IQR 4.8-14.6%) and 6.9% (IQR 4.1-11.1%) when using the Framingham, QRISK2, and full and reduced D:A:D scores, respectively. Agreement between the different scores was generally moderate, with the highest level of agreement being between the Framingham and QRISK2 scores (weighted kappa = 0.65) but with most other kappa coefficients in the 0.50-0.60 range. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of predicted 10-year CVD risk obtained with commonly used CVD risk prediction tools demonstrate, in general, only moderate agreement among PLWH in the UK. While further validation with clinical endpoints is required, our findings suggest that care should be taken when interpreting any score alone

The RIO trial: rationale, design, and the role of community involvement in a randomised placebo-controlled trial of antiretroviral therapy plus dual long-acting HIV-specific broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) in participants diagnosed with recent HIV infection-study protocol for a two-stage randomised phase II trial

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to dramatic improvements in survival for people living with HIV, but is unable to cure infection, or induce viral control off therapy. Designing intervention trials with novel agents with the potential to confer a period of HIV remission without ART remains a key scientific and community goal. We detail the rationale, design, and outcomes of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of two HIV-specific long-acting broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs): 3BNC117-LS and 10-1074-LS, which target CD4 binding site and V3 loop respectively, on post-treatment viral control. Methods: RIO is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective phase II study. Eligible individuals will have started ART within 3 months of primary HIV infection and have viral sequences that appear to be sensitive to both bNAbs. It will randomise 72 eligible participants 1:1 to the following arms via a two-stage design. In Stage 1, arm A participants are given dual long-acting (LS-variants) bNAbs infusions, followed by intensively monitored Analytical Treatment Interruption (ATI) (n = 36); in arm B, participants receive placebo infusions followed by ATI. The primary endpoint will be time to viral rebound within 36 weeks after ATI. Upon viral rebound, the participant and researcher are unblinded. Participants in arm A recommence ART and complete the study. Participants in arm B are invited to restart ART and enroll into Stage 2 where they will receive open-label LS bNAbs, followed by a second ATI 24 weeks after. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include adverse events, time to undetectable viraemia after restarting ART, immunological markers, HIV proviral DNA, serum bNAb concentrations in blood, bNAb resistance at viral rebound, and quality of life measures. Discussion: The two-stage design was determined in collaboration with community involvement. This design allows all participants the option to receive bNAbs. It also tests the hypothesis that bNAbs may drive sustained HIV control beyond the duration of detectable bNAb concentrations. Community representatives were involved at all stages. This included the two-stage design, discussion on the criteria to restart ART, frequency of monitoring visits off ART, and reducing the risk of onward transmission to HIV-negative partners. It also included responding to the challenges of COVID-19. Trial registration: The protocol is registered on Clinical.trials.gov and EudraCT and has approval from UK Ethics and MHRA

Level of agreement between frequently used cardiovascular risk calculators in people living with HIV

Objectives The aim of the study was to describe agreement between the QRISK2, Framingham and Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti‐HIV Drugs (D:A:D) cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators in a large UK study of people living with HIV (PLWH). Methods PLWH enrolled in the Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Observations in People over Fifty (POPPY) study without a prior CVD event were included in this study. QRISK2, Framingham CVD and the full and reduced D:A:D CVD scores were calculated; participants were stratified into ‘low’ ( 20%) categories for each. Agreement between scores was assessed using weighted kappas and Bland–Altman plots. Results The 730 included participants were predominantly male (636; 87.1%) and of white ethnicity (645; 88.5%), with a median age of 53 [interquartile range (IQR) 49–59] years. The median calculated 10‐year CVD risk was 11.9% (IQR 6.8–18.4%), 8.9% (IQR 4.6–15.0%), 8.5% (IQR 4.8–14.6%) and 6.9% (IQR 4.1–11.1%) when using the Framingham, QRISK2, and full and reduced D:A:D scores, respectively. Agreement between the different scores was generally moderate, with the highest level of agreement being between the Framingham and QRISK2 scores (weighted kappa = 0.65) but with most other kappa coefficients in the 0.50–0.60 range. Conclusions Estimates of predicted 10‐year CVD risk obtained with commonly used CVD risk prediction tools demonstrate, in general, only moderate agreement among PLWH in the UK. While further validation with clinical endpoints is required, our findings suggest that care should be taken when interpreting any score alone

Validation of a Novel Multivariate Method of Defining HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment

Background. The optimum method of defining cognitive impairment in virally suppressed people living with HIV is unknown. We evaluated the relationships between cognitive impairment, including using a novel multivariate method (NMM), patientreported outcome measures (PROMs), and neuroimaging markers of brain structure across 3 cohorts.Methods. Differences in the prevalence of cognitive impairment, PROMs, and neuroimaging data from the COBRA, CHARTER, and POPPY cohorts (total n = 908) were determined between HIV-positive participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), global deficit score (GDS), and NMM criteria.Results. The prevalence of cognitive impairment varied by up to 27% between methods used to define impairment (eg, 48% for HAND vs 21% for NMM in the CHARTER study). Associations between objective cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive complaints generally were weak. Physical and mental health summary scores (SF-36) were lowest for NMM-defined impairment (P&lt;.05). There were no differences in brain volumes or cortical thickness between participants with and without cognitive impairment defined using the HAND and GDS measures. In contrast, those identified with cognitive impairment by the NMM had reduced mean cortical thickness in both hemispheres (P&lt;.05), as well as smaller brain volumes (P&lt;.01). The associations with measures of white matter microstructure and brain-predicted age generally were weaker.Conclusion. Different methods of defining cognitive impairment identify different people with varying symptomatology and measures of brain injury. Overall, NMM-defined impairment was associated with most neuroimaging abnormalities and poorer selfreported health status. This may be due to the statistical advantage of using a multivariate approach

A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

Meeting abstrac