66 research outputs found
Results of international standardised beekeeper surveys of colony losses for winter 2012-2013 : analysis of winter loss rates and mixed effects modelling of risk factors for winter loss.
This article presents results of an analysis of winter losses of honey bee colonies from 19 mainly European countries, most of which implemented the standardised 2013 COLOSS questionnaire. Generalised linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) were used to investigate the effects of several factors on the risk of colony loss, including different treatments for Varroa destructor, allowing for random effects of beekeeper and region. Both winter and summer treatments were considered, and the most common combinations of treatment and timing were used to define treatment factor levels. Overall and within country colony loss rates are presented. Significant factors in the model were found to be: percentage of young queens in the colonies before winter, extent of queen problems in summer, treatment of the varroa mite, and access by foraging honey bees to oilseed rape and maize. Spatial variation at the beekeeper level is shown across geographical regions using random effects from the fitted models, both before and after allowing for the effect of the significant terms in the model. This spatial variation is considerable
COLOSS survey : global impact of COVID-19 on bee research
The socio-economic impacts of COVID-19 on society have yet to be truly revealed; there is no doubt that the pandemic
has severely affected the daily lives of most of humanity. It is to be expected that the research activities of scientists
could be impacted to varying degrees, but no data exist on how COVID-19 has affected research specifically.
Here, we show that the still ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has already diversely and negatively affected bee research at
a global level. An online survey disseminated through the global COLOSS honey bee research association showed that
every participant (n¼230 from 56 countries) reported an impact on one or more of their activities. Activities that
require travelling or the physical presence of people (meetings and conferences, teaching and extension) were affected
the most, but also laboratory and field activities, daily operations, supervision and other activities were affected to varying
degrees. Since the basic activities are very similar for many research fields, it appears as if our findings for bee
research can be extrapolated to other fields. In the light of our data, we recommend that stakeholders such as governments
and funding bodies who support research should facilitate the wide implementation of web-based information
technology required for efficient online communication for research and education, as well as adequately loosened
restriction measures with respect to field and laboratory work. Finally, increased flexibility in administration and extension
of research grants and fellowships seem to be needed. It is apparent that adequate responses by all stakeholders
are required to limit the impact of COVID-19 and future pandemics on bee science and other research fields.The Ricola Foundation Nature and Culture and Vetopharma.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjar20am2020Zoology and Entomolog
Recommended from our members
Food for pollinators: quantifying the nectar and pollen resources of urban flower meadows
Planted meadows are increasingly used to improve the biodiversity and aesthetic amenity value of urban areas. Although many ‘pollinator-friendly’ seed mixes are available, the floral resources these provide to flower-visiting insects, and how these change through time, are largely unknown. Such data are necessary to compare the resources provided by alternative meadow seed mixes to each other and to other flowering habitats. We used quantitative surveys of over 2 million flowers to estimate the nectar and pollen resources offered by two exemplar commercial seed mixes (one annual, one perennial) and associated weeds grown as 300m2 meadows across four UK cities, sampled at six time points between May and September 2013. Nectar sugar and pollen rewards per flower varied widely across 65 species surveyed, with native British weed species (including dandelion, Taraxacum agg.) contributing the top five nectar producers and two of the top ten pollen producers. Seed mix species yielding the highest rewards per flower included Leontodon hispidus, Centaurea cyanus and C. nigra for nectar, and Papaver rhoeas, Eschscholzia californica and Malva moschata for pollen. Perennial meadows produced up to 20x more nectar and up to 6x more pollen than annual meadows, which in turn produced far more than amenity grassland controls. Perennial meadows produced resources earlier in the year than annual meadows, but both seed mixes delivered very low resource levels early in the year and these were provided almost entirely by native weeds. Pollen volume per flower is well predicted statistically by floral morphology, and nectar sugar mass and pollen volume per unit area are correlated with flower counts, raising the possibility that resource levels can be estimated for species or habitats where they cannot be measured directly. Our approach does not incorporate resource quality information (for example, pollen protein or essential amino acid content), but can easily do so when suitable data exist. Our approach should inform the design of new seed mixes to ensure continuity in floral resource availability throughout the year, and to identify suitable species to fill resource gaps in established mixes
Harvesting Season and Botanical Origin Interferes in Production and Nutritional Composition of Bee Pollen
ConectCat : aplicación web : fiestas locales y otros servicios y puntos de interés en Cataluña
Aplicación web basada en mapas interactivos y timeline. Permite visualizar las fiestas locales así como otros servicios y puntos de interés de Cataluña
Peer-reviewed publishing of results from Citizen Science projects
Citizen science (CS) terms the active participation of the general public in scientific research activities. With increasing amounts of information generated by citizen scientists, best practices to go beyond science communication and publish these findings to the scientific community are needed. This letter is a synopsis of authors' personal experiences when publishing results from citizen science projects in peer-reviewed journals, as presented at the Austrian Citizen Science Conference 2018. Here, we address authors' selection criteria for publishing CS data in open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journals as well as barriers encountered during the publishing process. We also outline factors that influence the probability of publication using CS data, including 1) funding to cover publication costs; 2) quality, quantity and scientific novelty of CS data; 3) recommendations to acknowledge contributions of citizen scientists in scientific, peer-reviewed publications; 4) citizen scientists' preference of the hands-on experience over the product (publication) and 5) bias among scientists for certain data sources and the scientific jargon. These experiences show that addressing these barriers could greatly increase the rate of CS data included in scientific publications. © 2018, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati
Investigating the role of landscape composition on honey bee colony winter mortality: A long-term analysis
Identification of botanical origin of bee-collected mixed pollen samples: a comparison between palynological and DNA metabarcoding methods
International audienc
- …