Integration of TB and ART services fails to improve TB treatment outcomes: Comparison of ART/TB primary healthcare services in Cape Town, South Africa

BACKGROUND: The combined tuberculosis (TB) and HIV epidemics in South Africa (SA) have created enormous operational challenges for a health service that has traditionally run vertical programmes for TB treatment and antiretroviral therapy (ART) in separate facilities. This is particularly problematic for TB/HIV co-infected patients who need to access both services. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether integrated TB facilities had better TB treatment outcomes than single-service facilities in Cape Town, SA. METHODS: TB treatment outcomes were determined for newly registered, adult TB patients (aged > or = 18 years) at 13 integrated ART/TB primary healthcare (PHC) facilities and four single-service PHC facilities from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2010. A chi2 test adjusted for a cluster sample design was used to compare outcomes by type of facility. RESULTS: Of 13,542 newly registered patients, 10,030 received TB treatment in integrated facilities and 3,512 in single-service facilities. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups with HIV status determined for 9,351 (93.2%) and 3,227 (91.9%) patients, of whom 6 649 (66.3%) and 2,213 (63%) were HIV-positive in integrated facilities and single-service facilities, respectively. The median CD4+ count of HIV-positive patients was 152 cells/microl (interquartile range (IQR) 71-277) for integrated facilities and 148 cells/microl (IQR 67-260) for single-service facilities. There was no statistical difference in the TB treatment outcome profile between integrated and single-service facilities for all TB patients (p = 0.56) or for the sub-set of HIV-positive TB patients (p = 0.58) CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate improved TB treatment outcomes in integrated PHC facilities and showed that the provision of ART in the same facility as TB services was not associated with lower TB death and default rates

Development and evaluation of a patient decision aid for young people and parents considering fixed orthodontic appliances

OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a child-centred patient decision aid for young people, and their parents, supporting shared decision making about fixed orthodontic appliance treatment with dental health professionals, namely the Fixed Appliance Decision Aid (FADA). METHODS: The studies were undertaken in a UK teaching dental hospital orthodontic department in 2013-2014. The development phase involved an interview study with: (a) 10 patients (12-16 years old), and their parents, receiving orthodontic care to investigate treatment decision making and inform the content of the FADA and (b) 23 stakeholders critiquing the draft decision aid's content, structure and utility. The evaluation phase employed a pre-/post-test study design, with 30 patients (12-16 years old) and 30 parents. Outcomes included the Decisional Conflict Scale; measures of orthodontic treatment expectations and knowledge. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis identified two informational needs: effectiveness of treatment on orthodontic outcomes and treatment consequences for patients' lives. Quantitative analysis found decisional conflict reduced in both patients (mean difference -12.3, SD 15.3, 95% CI 6.6-17.9; p < 0.001) and parents (mean difference - 8.6, SD 16.6, 95% CI 2.5-14.8; p = 0.002); knowledge about duration and frequency of orthodontic treatment increased; expectations about care were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Using the FADA may enable dental professionals to support patients and their parents, decisions about fixed appliance treatments more effectively, ensuring young people's preferences are integrated into care planning

Eliciting preferences of persons with dementia and informal caregivers to support ageing in place in the Netherlands:a protocol for a discrete choice experiment

Introduction:Ageing in place (AIP) for persons with dementia is encouraged by European governments and societies. Healthcare packages may need reassessment to account for the preferences of care funders, patients and informal caregivers. By providing insight into people's preferences, discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can help develop consensus between stakeholders. This protocol paper outlines the development of a Dutch national study to cocreate a healthcare package design methodology built on DCEs that is person-centred and helps support informal caregivers and persons with dementia to AIP. A subpopulation analysis of persons with dementia with a migration background is planned due to their high risk for dementia and under-representation in research and care. Methods and analysis:The DCE is designed to understand how persons with dementia and informal caregivers choose between different healthcare packages. Qualitative methods are used to identify and prioritise important care components for persons with dementia to AIP. This will provide a list of care components that will be included in the DCE, to quantify the care needs and preferences of persons with dementia and informal caregivers. The DCE will identify individual and joint preferences to AIP. The relative importance of each attribute will be calculated. The DCE data will be analysed with the use of a random parameters logit model. Ethics and dissemination:Ethics approval was waived by the Amsterdam University Medical Center (W23_112 #23.137). A study summary will be available on the websites of Alzheimer Nederland, Pharos and Amsterdam Public Health institute. Results are expected to be presented at (inter)national conferences, peer-reviewed papers will be submitted, and a dissemination meeting will be held to bring stakeholders together. The study results will help improve healthcare package design for all stakeholders.</p

Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment

Background:Guidelines underline the role of individual preferences in the selection of a screening test, as insufficient evidence is available to recommend one screening test over another. We conducted a study to determine the preferences of individuals and to predict uptake for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using various screening tests. Methods:A discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire was distributed among naive subjects, yet to be screened, and previously screened subjects, aged 50-75 years. Subjects were asked to choose between scenarios on the basis of faecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy (TC) with various test-specific screening intervals and mortality reductions, and no screening (opt-out). Results:In total, 489 out of 1498 (33%) screening-naïve subjects (52% male; mean age±s.d. 61±7 years) and 545 out of 769 (71%) previously screened subjects (52% male; mean age±s.d. 61±6 years) returned the questionnaire. The type of screening test, screening interval, and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality influenced subjects' preferences (all P<0.05). Screening-naive and previously screened subjects equally preferred 5-yearly FS and 10-yearly TC (P=0.24; P=0.11), but favoured both strategies to annual FOBT screening (all P-values <0.001) if, based on the literature, realistic risk reduction of CRC-related mortality was applied. Screening-naive and previously screened subjects were willing to undergo a 10-yearly TC instead of a 5-yearly FS to obtain an additional risk reduction of CRC-related mortality of 45% (P<0.001). Conclusion:These data provide insight into the extent by which interval and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality affect preferences for CRC screening tests. Assuming realistic test characteristics, subjects in the target population preferred endoscopic screening over FOBT screening, partly, due to the more favourable risk reduction of CRC-related mortality by endoscopy screening. Increasing the knowledge of potential screenees regarding risk reduction by different screening strategies is, therefore, warranted to prevent unrealistic expectations and to optimise informed choice.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 2 March 2010; doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605566 www.bjcancer.com

A mixed-methods assessment of understanding (AoU) tool for AIDS vaccine trials in sub-Saharan Africa: results from a pilot study

Assessments of understanding (AoUs) in clinical trials are often composed of true/false multiple choice questions, however, these tools can be difficult for volunteers with limited education or without prior testing experience

Spatial-proteomics reveals phospho-signaling dynamics at subcellular resolution

Dynamic change in subcellular localization of signaling proteins is a general concept that eukaryotic cells evolved for eliciting a coordinated response to stimuli. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in combination with subcellular fractionation can provide comprehensive maps of spatio-temporal regulation of protein networks in cells, but involves laborious workflows that does not cover the phospho-proteome level. Here we present a high-throughput workflow based on sequential cell fractionation to profile the global proteome and phospho-proteome dynamics across six distinct subcellular fractions. We benchmark the workflow by studying spatio-temporal EGFR phospho-signaling dynamics in vitro in HeLa cells and in vivo in mouse tissues. Finally, we investigate the spatio-temporal stress signaling, revealing cellular relocation of ribosomal proteins in response to hypertonicity and muscle contraction. Proteomics data generated in this study can be explored through https://SpatialProteoDynamics.github.io

P15-13. HVTN 503(Phambili) trial discontinuation of enrolment/vaccination: the impact on trial participant attitudes to vaccine trials and scientific research

Background: The HVTN 503/Phambili trial, a phase IIB study of the Merck Ad-5 HIV vaccine, suspended enrollment and vaccinations following results of the HVTN502/STEP study. Participants were notified of their treatment allocation and continue to be followed. We investigated the impact of the suspension on trial participants' attitudes towards HIV vaccine trials and scientific research. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire investigating knowledge and attitudes utilising a five-point likert scale, was administered 12–18 months post suspension at the 4 Phambili trial sites implementing the latest protocol. Results: Of 544 participants enrolled at 4 sites, 490 completed the questionnaire. 51% understood that vaccination, and 31% that enrolment had been permanently discontinued. Although 85% knew Phambili DSMB recommendations were based on results of the STEP study, only 51% knew that the results showed more infections in the vaccine arm. Although 90% knew they should continue protecting themselves against HIV, only 33% acknowledged trialists' concerns that the vaccine may make them more susceptible to HIV. Knowledge was similar across sites. 12% had tested for HIV antibodies outside of the trial before unblinding to establish their treatment allocation. 46% felt disappointed, angry or afraid, primarily because the vaccine would not prevent HIV in their community. 79% said they would engage in less risk behaviour. 94% thought the study team had made the correct decision by unblinding them and 96% thought site-participant communication was appropriate. 91% felt they made the right decision to enrol in Phambili and 91% planned to continue attending scheduled visits. 86% support scientific research and 80% would want to participate in future HIV vaccine. Conclusion: Despite site communications, knowledge levels were low. Importantly, most knew they should continue to protect themselves against HIV. Although almost half of participants reported negative feelings, most attitudes towards trial sites, scientific research and HIV vaccine trials were positive