Tegumentary leishmaniasis and coinfections other than HIV

<div><p>Background</p><p>Tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) is a disease of skin and/or mucosal tissues caused by <i>Leishmania</i> parasites. TL patients may concurrently carry other pathogens, which may influence the clinical outcome of TL.</p><p>Methodology and principal findings</p><p>This review focuses on the frequency of TL coinfections in human populations, interactions between <i>Leishmania</i> and other pathogens in animal models and human subjects, and implications of TL coinfections for clinical practice. For the purpose of this review, TL is defined as all forms of cutaneous (localised, disseminated, or diffuse) and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, superinfection with skin bacteria, and skin manifestations of visceral leishmaniasis are not included. We searched MEDLINE and other databases and included 73 records: 21 experimental studies in animals and 52 studies about human subjects (mainly cross-sectional and case studies). Several reports describe the frequency of <i>Trypanosoma cruzi</i> coinfection in TL patients in Argentina (about 41%) and the frequency of helminthiasis in TL patients in Brazil (15% to 88%). Different hypotheses have been explored about mechanisms of interaction between different microorganisms, but no clear answers emerge. Such interactions may involve innate immunity coupled with regulatory networks that affect quality and quantity of acquired immune responses. Diagnostic problems may occur when concurrent infections cause similar lesions (e.g., TL and leprosy), when different pathogens are present in the same lesions (e.g., <i>Leishmania</i> and <i>Sporothrix schenckii</i>), or when similarities between phylogenetically close pathogens affect accuracy of diagnostic tests (e.g., serology for leishmaniasis and Chagas disease). Some coinfections (e.g., helminthiasis) appear to reduce the effectiveness of antileishmanial treatment, and drug combinations may cause cumulative adverse effects.</p><p>Conclusions and significance</p><p>In patients with TL, coinfection is frequent, it can lead to diagnostic errors and delays, and it can influence the effectiveness and safety of treatment. More research is needed to unravel how coinfections interfere with the pathogenesis of TL.</p></div

Lawson criterion for ignition exceeded in an inertial fusion experiment

For more than half a century, researchers around the world have been engaged in attempts to achieve fusion ignition as a proof of principle of various fusion concepts. Following the Lawson criterion, an ignited plasma is one where the fusion heating power is high enough to overcome all the physical processes that cool the fusion plasma, creating a positive thermodynamic feedback loop with rapidly increasing temperature. In inertially confined fusion, ignition is a state where the fusion plasma can begin "burn propagation" into surrounding cold fuel, enabling the possibility of high energy gain. While "scientific breakeven" (i.e., unity target gain) has not yet been achieved (here target gain is 0.72, 1.37 MJ of fusion for 1.92 MJ of laser energy), this Letter reports the first controlled fusion experiment, using laser indirect drive, on the National Ignition Facility to produce capsule gain (here 5.8) and reach ignition by nine different formulations of the Lawson criterion

Cerebrolysin dose-dependently improves neurological outcome in rats after acute stroke: A prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Cerebrolysin is a mixture of neuropeptides and free amino acids that is clinically used for the treatment of stroke. To further standardize treatment schemes, we assessed the dose response of Cerebrolysin on sensorimotor outcome in a rat model of ischemic stroke. METHODS: This study was a prospective, blinded, placebo-controlled, preclinical experiment. Male and female Wistar rats, subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, were randomly treated with Cerebrolysin doses of 0.8, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 ml/kg or placebo, 4 h after middle cerebral artery occlusion for a total of 10 consecutive days. RESULTS: The primary outcome was neurologic improvement at day 28, lesion volume, mortality, and animal weight were secondary and safety outcomes, respectively. There was a significant (p \u3c 0.001) dose effect of Cerebrolysin on neurological outcome. Cerebrolysin at a dose of ≥ 2.5 ml/kg significantly (p \u3c 0.001) improved neurological outcome (Mean Estimate (95% CL): 0.8 ml/kg: 6.2 (-6.0/18.4), 2.5 ml/kg: -28.9 (-41.6/-16.2), 5.0 ml/kg: -33.4 (-45.0/-21.7), 7.5 ml/kg: -36.3 (-48.2/-24.4). Higher doses (≥ 2.5 ml/kg) resulted in better recovery; however, differences between effective doses were not significant. Treatment with 5 ml/kg reduced lesion volume (p = 0.016). No treatment gender interactions were found and there were no differences in death or weight loss. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these data on Cerebrolysin efficacy demonstrate the feasibility of a preclinical study setup following a randomized, placebo-controlled, and blinded design with a clinical relevant treatment scheme. Cerebrolysin at doses of ≥ 2.5 ml/kg improved functional outcome and at a dose of 5 ml/kg reduced infarct volume

Scientific rigor and the art of motorcycle maintenance

The reliability of scientific research is under scrutiny. A recently convened working group proposes cultural adjustments to incentivize better research practices