141 research outputs found
Selection bias in family reports on end of life with dementia in nursing homes
Background: Selective participation in retrospective studies of families recruited after the patient's death may threaten generalizability of reports on end-of-life experiences.
Objectives: To assess possible selection bias in retrospective study of dementia at the end of life using family reports.
Methods: Two physician teams covering six nursing home facilities in the Netherlands reported on 117 of 119 consecutive decedents within two weeks after death unaware of after-death family participation in the study. They reported on characteristics; treatment and care; overall patient outcomes such as comfort, nursing care, and outcomes; and their own perspectives on the experience. We compared results between decedents with and without family participation.
Results: The family response rate was 55%. There were no significant differences based on participation versus nonparticipation in demographics and other nursing home resident characteristics, treatment and care, or overall resident outcome. However, among participating families, physicians perceived higher-quality aspects of nursing care and outcome, better consensus between staff and family on treatment, and a more peaceful death. Participation was less likely with involvement of a new family member in the last month.
Conclusions: Families may be more likely to participate in research with more harmonious teamwork in end-of-life caregiving. Where family participation is an enrollment criterion, comparing demographics alone may not capture possible selection bias, especially in more subjective measures. Selection bias toward more positive experiences, which may include the physician's and probably also the family's experiences, should be considered if representativeness is aimed for. Future work should address selection bias in other palliative settings and countries, and with prospective recruitment
Involvement of supportive care professionals in patient care in the last month of life
Background: In the last month of life, many patients suffer from multiple symptoms and problems. Professional supportive care involvement may help to alleviate patients’ suffering and provide them with an optimal last phase of life. Purpose: We investigated how often palliative care consultants, pain specialists, psychological experts and spiritual caregivers are involved in caring for patients in the last month of life, and which factors are associated with their involvement. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to physicians who had attended the death of a patient from a stratified sample of 8496 deaths that had occurred in 2010 in the Netherlands. The response rate was 74 % (n = 6263). Results: A palliative care team or consultant had been involved in the last month of life in 12 % of all patients for whom death was expected; this percentage was 3 % for pain specialists, 6 % for psychologists or psychiatrists and 13 % for spiritual caregivers. Involvement of palliative care or pain specialists was most common in younger patients, in patients with cancer and in patients who died at home. Involvement of psychological or spiritual caregivers was most common in older patients, in females, in patients with dementia and in patients who died in a nursing home. Involvement of supportive caregivers was also associated with the use of morphine and end-of-life decisions. Conclusion: Supportive care professionals are involved in end-of-life care in about a quarter of all non-suddenly dying patients. Their involvement is related to the setting where patients die, to the patient’s characteristics and to complex ethical decision-making
Опыт комплексного лечения анаэробного парапроктита
Детально освещен 18−летний опыт комплексного лечения больных анаэробным парапроктитом. Описаны методы применявшегося хирургического вмешательства. Установлены статистически достоверные факты риска неблагоприятного течения заболевания.A 18−year experience of complex treatment for anaerobic paraproctitis is featured. The methods of the intervention are described. Statistically significant risk factors of an unfavorable course of the disease were established
End-of-life hospital referrals by out-of-hours general practitioners: a retrospective chart study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients are transferred from home to hospital during the final phase of life and the majority die in hospital. The aim of the study is to explore hospital referrals of palliative care patients for whom an out-of-hours general practitioner was called.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A retrospective descriptive chart study was conducted covering a one-year period (1/Nov/2005 to 1/Nov/2006) in all eight out-of-hours GP co-operatives in the Amsterdam region (Netherlands). All symptoms, sociodemographic and medical characteristics were recorded in 529 charts for palliative care patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the variables associated with hospital referrals at the end of life.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In all, 13% of all palliative care patients for whom an out-of-hours general practitioner was called were referred to hospital. Palliative care patients with cancer (OR 5,1), cardiovascular problems (OR 8,3), digestive problems (OR 2,5) and endocrine, metabolic and nutritional (EMN) problems (OR 2,5) had a significantly higher chance of being referred. Patients receiving professional nursing care (OR 0,2) and patients for whom their own general practitioner had transferred information to the out-of-hours cooperative (OR 0,4) had a significantly lower chance of hospital referral. The most frequent reasons for hospital referral, as noted by the out-of-hours general practitioner, were digestive (30%), EMN (19%) and respiratory (17%) problems.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Whilst acknowledging that an out-of-hours hospital referral can be the most desirable option in some situations, this study provides suggestions for avoiding undesirable hospital referrals by out-of-hours general practitioners at the end of life. These include anticipating digestive, EMN, respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms in palliative care patients.</p
Wat bespreken artsen met hun patiënten in de terminale fase? Een crossnationale vergelijking.
Physician reports of terminal sedation without hydration or nutrition for patients nearing death in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Terminal sedation in patients nearing death is an important
issue related to end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the practice of
terminal sedation in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Face-to-face interviews.
SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Nationwide stratified sample of
482 physicians; 410 responded and 211 of these reported characteristics of
their most recent terminal sedation case. MEASUREMENTS: Physician reports
of frequency of terminal sedation (defined as the administration of drugs
to keep the patient in deep sedation or coma until death, without giving
artificial nutrition or hydration), characteristics of the decision-making
process, drugs used, the estimated life-shortening effect, and frequency
of euthanasia discussions. RESULTS: Of respondents, 52% (95% CI, 48% to
57%) had ever used terminal sedation. Of the 211 most recent cases,
physicians used terminal sedation to alleviate severe pain in 51% of
patients (CI, 44% to 58%), agitation in 38% (CI, 32% to 45%), and dyspnea
in 38% (CI, 32% to 45%). Physicians reported discussing with patients th
Factors associated with requesting and receiving euthanasia: a nationwide mortality follow-back study with a focus on patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems related to old age
Background
Recently, euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) in patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems has taken a prominent place in the public debate. However, limited is known about this practice. The purpose of this study was threefold: to estimate the frequency of requesting and receiving EAS among people with (also) a psychiatric disorder, dementia, or an accumulation of health problems; to explore reasons for physicians to grant or refuse a request; and to describe differences in characteristics, including the presence of psychiatric disorders, dementia, and accumulation of health problems, between patients who did and did not request EAS and between patients whose request was or was not granted.
Methods
A nationwide cross-sectional survey study was performed. A stratified sample of death certificates of patients who died between 1 August and 1 December 2015 was drawn from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands. Questionnaires were sent to the certifying physician (n = 9351, response 78%). Only deceased patients aged ≥ 17 years and who died a non-sudden death were included in the analyses (n = 5361).
Results
The frequency of euthanasia requests among deceased people who died non-suddenly and with (also) a psychiatric disorder (11.4%), dementia (2.1%), or an accumulation of health problems (8.0%) varied. Factors positively associated with requesting euthanasia were age (< 80 years), ethnicity (Dutch/Western), cause of death (cancer), attending physician (general practitioner), and involvement of a pain specialist or psychiatrist. Cause of death (neurological disorders, another cause) and attending physician (general practitioner) were also positively associated with receiving euthanasia. Psychiatric disorders, dementia, and/or an accumulation of health problems were negatively associated with both requesting and receiving euthanasia.
Conclusions
EAS in deceased patients with psychiatric disorders, dementia, and/or an accumulation of health problems is relatively rare. Partly, this can be explained by the belief that the due care criteria cannot be met. Another explanation is that patients with these conditions are less likely to request EAS
Clinical problems with the performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The characteristics and frequency of clinical
problems with the performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
are uncertain. We analyzed data from two studies of euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands (one conducted in 1990 and
1991 and the other in 1995 and 1996), with a total of 649 cases. We
categorized clinical problems as technical problems, such as difficulty
inserting an intravenous line; complications, such as myoclonus or
vomiting; or problems with completion, such as a longer-than-expected
interval between the administration of medications and death. RESULTS: In
114 cases, the physician's intention was to provide assistance with
suicide, and in 535, the intention was to perform euthanasia. Problems of
any type were more frequent in cases of assisted suicide than in cases of
euthanasia. Complications occurred in 7 percent of cases of assisted
suicide, and problems with completion (a longer-than-expected time to
death, failure to induce coma, or induction of coma followed by awakening
of the patient) occurred in 16 percent of the cases; complications and
problems with completion occurred in 3 percent and 6 percent of cases of
euthanasia, respectively. The physician decided to administer a letha
Nurse-physician communication around identifying palliative care needs in nursing home residents
Global Challenges (FSW
- …