1,001 research outputs found

    Patients' and relatives' assessment of clozapine treatment

    Get PDF
    Published version: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PS

    The pp-parabolicity under a decay assumption on the Ricci curvature

    Full text link
    We prove that, given α>0\alpha>0, if MM is a complete Riemannian manifold which Ricci curvature satisfies.Ricx(v)αsech2(r(x)))\operatorname*{Ric}\nolimits_{x}(v)\geq\alpha\operatorname{sech}^{2}% (r(x))) or Ricx(v)hα(r(x))r(x)2, \operatorname*{Ric}\nolimits_{x}(v)\geq-\frac{{h_{\alpha}}% (r(x))}{r(x)^{2}}, where hα(r)=α(α+1)r(x)αr(x)α1, {h_{\alpha}}(r)=\frac{\alpha(\alpha+1)r(x)^{\alpha }}{r(x)^{\alpha }-1}, for all xM\BR(o)x\in M\backslash B_{R}(o) and for all vTxM,v\in T_{x}M, v=1,\left\Vert v\right\Vert =1, where \ oo is a fixed point of MM, r(x)=d(o,x)r(x)=d(o,x), dd the Riemannian distance in MM and BR(o)B_{R}(o) the geodesic ball of MM centered at oo with radius R>0R>0, then MM is pp-parabolic for any p>1p>1, if satisfies the first inequality, and MM is pp-parabolic, for any p(α+1)(n1)+1p\geq(\alpha+1)(n-1)+1, if satisfies the second inequality

    Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives to promote adherence to depot antipsychotic medication: economic evaluation of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Offering a modest financial incentive to people with psychosis can promote adherence to depot antipsychotic medication, but the cost-effectiveness of this approach has not been examined. Methods: Economic evaluation within a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial. 141 patients under the care of 73 teams (clusters) were randomised to intervention or control; 138 patients with diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder or bipolar disorder participated. Intervention participants received £15 per depot injection over 12 months, additional to usual acute, mental and community primary health services. The control group received usual health services. Main outcome measures: incremental cost per 20% increase in adherence to depot antipsychotic medication; incremental cost of ‘good’ adherence (defined as taking at least 95% of the prescribed number of depot medications over the intervention period). Findings: Economic and outcome data for baseline and 12-month follow-up were available for 117 participants. The adjusted difference in adherence between groups was 12.2% (73.4% control vs. 85.6% intervention); the adjusted costs difference was £598 (95% CI -£4 533, £5 730). The extra cost per patient to increase adherence to depot medications by 20% was £982 (95% CI -£8 020, £14 000). The extra cost per patient of achieving 'good' adherence was £2 950 (CI -£19 400, £27 800). Probability of cost-effectiveness exceeded 97.5%at willingness-to-pay values of £14 000 for a 20% increase in adherence and £27 800 for good adherence. Interpretation: Offering a modest financial incentive to people with psychosis is cost-effective in promoting adherence to depot antipsychotic medication. Direct healthcare costs (including costs of the financial incentive) are unlikely to be increased by this intervention. Trial Registration: ISRCTN.com 7776928

    An Overview of Medicaid Managed Care Litigation

    Get PDF
    This Issue Brief is intended as one of several in the Managed Behavioral Health Care Issue Brief Series that deals with managed behavioral health care from a purely legal point of view. Since the enactment of Medicaid in 1965, states have had the option of offering beneficiaries enrollment in managed care arrangements. With the advent of mandatory managed care reaching millions of beneficiaries (including a growing proportion of disabled recipients), the amount and scope of litigation involving Medicaid managed care plans can be expected to grow. A review of the current litigation regarding Medicaid managed care reveals two basic types of lawsuits: (1) those that challenge the practices of managed care companies under various federal and state laws that safeguard consumer rights, protect health care quality, and prohibit discrimination; and (2) suits that assert claims arising directly under the Medicaid statute and implementing regulations, as well as claims related to Constitutional safeguards that undergird the program

    Do patients prefer optimistic or cautious psychiatrists? An experimental study with new and long-term patients

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Patients seeking treatment may be assumed to prefer a psychiatrist who suggests a new treatment with confidence and optimism. Yet, this might not apply uniformly to all patients. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that new patients prefer psychiatrists who present treatments optimistically, whilst patients with longer-term experience of mental health care may rather prefer more cautious psychiatrists. Methods In an experimental study, we produced video-clips of four psychiatrists, each suggesting a pharmacological and a psychological treatment once with optimism and once with caution. 100 \u2018new\u2019 patients with less than 3\ua0months experience of mental health care and 100 \u2018long-term\u2019 patients with more than one year of experience were shown a random selection of one video-clip from each psychiatrist, always including an optimistic and a cautious suggestion of each treatment. Patients rated their preferences for psychiatrists on Likert type scales. Differences in subgroups with different age (18\u201340 vs. 41\u201365 years), gender, school leaving age (\u226416 vs. >16\ua0years), and diagnosis (ICD 10\ua0F2 vs. others) were explored. Results New patients preferred more optimistic treatment suggestions, whilst there was no preference among long-term patients. The interaction effect between preference for treatment presentations and experience of patients was significant (interaction p -value\u2009=\u20090.003). Findings in subgroups were similar. Conclusion In line with the hypothesis, psychiatrists should suggest treatments with optimism to patients with little experience of mental health care. However, this rule does not apply to longer-term patients, who may have experienced treatment failures in the past
    corecore