34 research outputs found
MODERNIZATION OF INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL BASES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC
Purpose: the purpose of the research is to evaluate proposals on the formation of a fundamentally new support and zonal structure for managing the development of the Russian Arctic and related changes in the regulatory and legal support for this development.Methods: research is carried out with the use of interdisciplinary methodologies which integrate specific tools of research of economic, sociological, political science, ecological, legal and other issues of spatial systemsβ functioning.Results: there is an active modernization in the production, infrastructure and defense spheres on the territory of the Russian Arctic, the accelerated development of which can be considered a prerequisite for solving the social and economic problems of the integrated development of the whole macroregion. At the same time, the gradual modernization of the institutional and legal bases for the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) began. An additional impetus was given to it by the adoption of Decree β1064 of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 31, 2017 on a new state program for the development of the Arctic that made significant adjustments to earlier decisions on public administration and legal support for the development of the Russian Arctic.Conclusions and relevance: the authors showed that one of the main reasons for the slow implementation of the justifiably ambitious intentions of the country's leadership on the complex socio-economic re-development of the Russian Arctic was the underestimation of the importance of modernizing the institutional and legal bases for the re-development of the Russian Arctic. The modernization of the institutional and legal bases of spatial development is becoming an important factor in the stable functioning of not only the state, regions and municipalities, but also for the implementation of any investment projects. The data on innovations in the structure of the institutes and legal regulators of the development of the Russian Arctic confirms the undoubtedly positive potential for modernizing the institutional and legal bases for the spatial development of the Russian Arctic and the need for experimental verification of the decisions taken so that that potential could be fully realized
ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ― ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ’Π£Π¦ΠΠΠΠΠΠ¬ΠΠ-ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ«Π₯ ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ― Π ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠΠ
Purpose: the purpose of the research is to evaluate proposals on the formation of a fundamentally new support and zonal structure for managing the development of the Russian Arctic and related changes in the regulatory and legal support for this development.Methods: research is carried out with the use of interdisciplinary methodologies which integrate specific tools of research of economic, sociological, political science, ecological, legal and other issues of spatial systemsβ functioning.Results: there is an active modernization in the production, infrastructure and defense spheres on the territory of the Russian Arctic, the accelerated development of which can be considered a prerequisite for solving the social and economic problems of the integrated development of the whole macroregion. At the same time, the gradual modernization of the institutional and legal bases for the development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) began. An additional impetus was given to it by the adoption of Decree β1064 of the Government of the Russian Federation of August 31, 2017 on a new state program for the development of the Arctic that made significant adjustments to earlier decisions on public administration and legal support for the development of the Russian Arctic.Conclusions and relevance: the authors showed that one of the main reasons for the slow implementation of the justifiably ambitious intentions of the country's leadership on the complex socio-economic re-development of the Russian Arctic was the underestimation of the importance of modernizing the institutional and legal bases for the re-development of the Russian Arctic. The modernization of the institutional and legal bases of spatial development is becoming an important factor in the stable functioning of not only the state, regions and municipalities, but also for the implementation of any investment projects. The data on innovations in the structure of the institutes and legal regulators of the development of the Russian Arctic confirms the undoubtedly positive potential for modernizing the institutional and legal bases for the spatial development of the Russian Arctic and the need for experimental verification of the decisions taken so that that potential could be fully realized.Β Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ² ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ-Π·ΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠΠ Π€) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ.ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ: ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
, ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ: ΠΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ
, ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π€. ΠΠ°Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ² Π² ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π€, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π Π€ ΠΎΡ 31 Π°Π²Π³ΡΡΡΠ° 2017 Π³. β 1064 ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π Π°ΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΠΠ Π€. ΠΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π·Π°Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π·ΠΎΠ½Ρ.ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎ Π°ΠΌΠ±ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ·Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π€ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π€. ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ², Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π»ΡΠ±ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ
Π² ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π±Π΅ΡΡΠΏΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ Π€, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΡΡΠΎΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π» Π±ΡΠ» ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅.
ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ« Π‘Π’Π Π£ΠΠ’Π£Π ΠΠ-ΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠ Π Π‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ«Π₯ Π ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ₯ Π£Π‘ΠΠΠΠΠ―Π₯
The article describes the principles of structural and investment policy, which should become one of the elements of a long-term economic strategy aimed at eliminating development disparities that have emerged in the last two decades and can not be eliminated by traditional market instruments. A description is given of the main directions of the structural and investment policy, its instruments, as well as an assessment in long-term economic dynamics.Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π²Π° Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΈΠ½Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π° Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ
A conceptual governance framework for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction integration
Climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR) have similar targets and goals in relation to climate change and related risks. The integration of CCA in core DRR operations is crucial to provide simultaneous benefits for social systems coping with challenges posed by climate extremes and climate change. Although state actors are generally responsible for governing a public issue such as CCA and DRR integration, the reform of top-down governing modes in neoliberal societies has enlarged the range of potential actors to include non state actors from economic and social communities. These new intervening actors require in-depth investigation. To achieve this goal, the article investigates the set of actors and their bridging arrangements that create and shape governance in CCA and DRR integration. The article conducts a comprehensive literature review in order to retrieve main actors and arrangements. The article summarizes actors and arrangements into a conceptual governance framework that can be used as a backdrop for future research on the topic. However, this framework has an explorative form, which must be refined according to site- and context-specific variables, norms, or networks. Accordingly, this article promotes an initial application of the framework to different contexts. Scholars may adopt the framework as a roadmap with which to corroborate the existence of a theoretical and empirical body of knowledge on governance of CCA and DRR integration
Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI): facing the challenges and pathways of global change in the twenty-first century
Β© 2017, The Author(s). During the past several decades, the Earth system has changed significantly, especially across Northern Eurasia. Changes in the socio-economic conditions of the larger countries in the region have also resulted in a variety of regional environmental changes that can have global consequences. The Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI) has been designed as an essential continuation of the Northern Eurasia Earth Science Partnership Initiative (NEESPI), which was launched in 2004. NEESPI sought to elucidate all aspects of ongoing environmental change, to inform societies and, thus, to better prepare societies for future developments. A key principle of NEFI is that these developments must now be secured through science-based strategies co-designed with regional decision-makers to lead their societies to prosperity in the face of environmental and institutional challenges. NEESPI scientific research, data, and models have created a solid knowledge base to support the NEFI program. This paper presents the NEFI research vision consensus based on that knowledge. It provides the reader with samples of recent accomplishments in regional studies and formulates new NEFI science questions. To address these questions, nine research foci are identified and their selections are briefly justified. These foci include warming of the Arctic; changing frequency, pattern, and intensity of extreme and inclement environmental conditions; retreat of the cryosphere; changes in terrestrial water cycles; changes in the biosphere; pressures on land use; changes in infrastructure; societal actions in response to environmental change; and quantification of Northern Eurasiaβs role in the global Earth system. Powerful feedbacks between the Earth and human systems in Northern Eurasia (e.g., mega-fires, droughts, depletion of the cryosphere essential for water supply, retreat of sea ice) result from past and current human activities (e.g., large-scale water withdrawals, land use, and governance change) and potentially restrict or provide new opportunities for future human activities. Therefore, we propose that integrated assessment models are needed as the final stage of global change assessment. The overarching goal of this NEFI modeling effort will enable evaluation of economic decisions in response to changing environmental conditions and justification of mitigation and adaptation efforts
Recommended from our members
Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI): facing the challenges and pathways of global change in the 21st century
During the past several decades, the Earth system has changed significantly, especially across Northern Eurasia. Changes in the socio-economic conditions of the larger countries in the region have also resulted in a variety of regional environmental changes that can
have global consequences. The Northern Eurasia Future Initiative (NEFI) has been designed as an essential continuation of the Northern Eurasia Earth Science
Partnership Initiative (NEESPI), which was launched in 2004. NEESPI sought to elucidate all aspects of ongoing environmental change, to inform societies and, thus, to
better prepare societies for future developments. A key principle of NEFI is that these developments must now be secured through science-based strategies co-designed
with regional decision makers to lead their societies to prosperity in the face of environmental and institutional challenges. NEESPI scientific research, data, and
models have created a solid knowledge base to support the NEFI program. This paper presents the NEFI research vision consensus based on that knowledge. It provides the reader with samples of recent accomplishments in regional studies and formulates new NEFI science questions. To address these questions, nine research foci are identified and their selections are briefly justified. These foci include: warming of the Arctic; changing frequency, pattern, and intensity of extreme and inclement environmental conditions; retreat of the cryosphere; changes in terrestrial water cycles; changes in the biosphere; pressures on land-use; changes in infrastructure; societal actions in response to environmental change; and quantification of Northern Eurasia's role in the global Earth system. Powerful feedbacks between the Earth and human systems in Northern Eurasia (e.g., mega-fires, droughts, depletion of the cryosphere essential for water supply, retreat of sea ice) result from past and current human activities (e.g., large scale water withdrawals, land use and governance change) and
potentially restrict or provide new opportunities for future human activities. Therefore, we propose that Integrated Assessment Models are needed as the final stage of global
change assessment. The overarching goal of this NEFI modeling effort will enable evaluation of economic decisions in response to changing environmental conditions and justification of mitigation and adaptation efforts